there are no tests but since Gitea uses @v1 since last month and Gitea
maintainers rely on make watch, it is safe to assume that upgrading is
not broken. Switching to v1 would require less scrutiny on the
upgrades. Even if there is breakage, it can be fixed with minimal
impact on the developer workflow.
- add a new button to the org view that is only shown to the org members
- add integration test to verify the expected navigatability
- add a new translation string to that button
- fix display style of "View <orgname>" button on the dashboard
- fix gap size between buttons on the org view by utilizing the common class top-right-buttons
This is a follow-up for 5e1bd8af5f, which
was my first commit to Gitea. It is also a follow up for the
Gitea PR #29300 (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23900) created
by myself, which turned stale.
This change partially restores the behavior of Gitea PR #23747
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23747) by wxiaoguang, but
maintains the lock.
The original idea was to differentiate things from GitHub and GitLab a
little bit, and show the email address on the profile. The profile is
not only a place where the user chooses to show how they present
themselves on an instance, it is also a place where they can assess
their relationship *with* the instance, as it provides features such
as the Public Activity feed that can be only shown to the user, in
private.
It's, in some way, a dashboard. The email was shown there to remind
the user that this is the primary email that will be used by a supposed
administrator to contact them. There were other motivations behind that
change as well, but, long story short, the idea did not work very well,
as some people (e.g. people livestreaming on the Internet, or 'normal'
users sharing their screens) do not want to put their email address
out there when showing their screen to other people.
Other alternatives, such as blurring the text or only showing the real
email address, were explored, but were rejected because of
browser compatibility and simplicity reasons. The padlock icon that
is shown when showing the email address to other people has been kept.
One viable alternative could be displaying the placeholder email
instead, but that requires some more thought.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1950.
This allows `nix flake metadata` and nix in general to lock a *branch*
tarball link in a manner that causes it to fetch the correct commit even
if the branch is updated with a newer version.
For further context, Nix flakes are a feature that, among other things,
allows for "inputs" that are "github:someuser/somerepo",
"https://some-tarball-service/some-tarball.tar.gz",
"sourcehut:~meow/nya" or similar. This feature allows our users to fetch
tarballs of git-based inputs to their builds rather than using git to
fetch them, saving significant download time.
There is presently no gitea or forgejo specific fetcher in Nix, and we
don't particularly wish to have one. Ideally (as a developer on a Nix
implementation myself) we could just use the generic tarball fetcher and
not add specific forgejo support, but to do so, we need additional
metadata to know which commit a given *branch* tarball represents, which
is the purpose of the Link header added here.
The result of this patch is that a Nix user can specify `inputs.something.url =
"https://forgejo-host/some/project/archive/main.tar.gz"` in flake.nix
and get a link to some concrete tarball for the actual commit in the
lock file, then when they run `nix flake update` in the future, they
will get the latest commit in that branch.
Example of it working locally:
» nix flake metadata --refresh 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix'
Resolved URL: http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix
Locked URL: 804ede182b.tar.gz?dir=configs
/nix&narHash=sha256-yP7KkDVfuixZzs0fsqhSETXFC0y8m6nmPLw2GrAMxKQ%3D
Description: Computers with the nixos
Path: /nix/store/s856c6yqghyan4v0zy6jj19ksv0q22nx-source
Revision: 804ede182b6b66469b23ea4d21eece52766b7a06
Last modified: 2024-05-02 00:48:32
For details on the header value, see:
56763ff918/doc/manual/src/protocols/tarball-fetcher.md
In `repo.RemoveDependency`, use `PostFormValue` instead of
`PostForm.Get`. The latter requires `ParseForm()` to be called prior,
and in this case, has no benefit over `PostFormValue` anyway (which
calls `ParseForm()` if necessary).
While this currently does not cause any issue as far as I can tell, it
feels like a bug lying in wait for the perfect opportunity. Lets squash
it before it can do harm.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Adjust the `anyHashPattern` to match URL query parameters too, and
adjust `fullHashPatternProcessor` accordingly.
Includes a test case, and an update to an existing one to account for
the new capture group.
Fixes #3548.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Also add a test for GogsDownloaderFactory.New() to make sure
that the URL of the source repository is parsed correctly.
When the source gogs instance is hosted at a subpath like `https://git.example.com/gogs/<username>/<reponame>` the migration fails.
This PR fixes that.
Co-authored-by: hecker <tomas.hecker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3572
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
Co-committed-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
To be able to easily test cases where the repository does not have any
code, where the git repo itself is completely uninitialized, lets
support a case where the `AutoInit` property is false.
For the sake of backwards compatibility, if the option is not set either
way, it will default to `true`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
When subscribing or unsubscribing to/from an issue on the web ui, the
request was posted to a route handled by `repo.IssueWatch`. This
function used `ctx.Req.PostForm.Get()`, erroneously.
`request.PostForm` is *only* available if `request.ParseForm()` has been
called before it. The function in question did not do that. Under some
circumstances, something, somewhere did end up calling `ParseForm()`,
but not in every scenario.
Since we do not need to check for multiple values, the easiest fix here
is to use `ctx.Req.PostFormValue`, which will call `ParseForm()` if
necessary.
Fixes #3516.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
