8.6 KiB
stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
none | unassigned | To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
Guidelines for reusing abstractions
As GitLab has grown, different patterns emerged across the codebase. Service classes, serializers, and presenters are just a few. These patterns made it easy to reuse code, but at the same time make it easy to accidentally reuse the wrong abstraction in a particular place.
Why these guidelines are necessary
Code reuse is good, but sometimes this can lead to shoehorning the wrong abstraction into a particular use case. This in turn can have a negative impact on maintainability, the ability to easily debug problems, or even performance.
An example would be to use ProjectsFinder
in IssuesFinder
to limit issues to
those belonging to a set of projects. While initially this may seem like a good
idea, both classes provide a very high level interface with very little control.
This means that IssuesFinder
may not be able to produce a better optimized
database query, as a large portion of the query is controlled by the internals
of ProjectsFinder
.
To work around this problem, you would use the same code used by
ProjectsFinder
, instead of using ProjectsFinder
itself directly. This allows
you to compose your behavior better, giving you more control over the behavior
of the code.
To illustrate, consider the following code from IssuableFinder#projects
:
return @projects = project if project?
projects =
if current_user && params[:authorized_only].presence && !current_user_related?
current_user.authorized_projects
elsif group
finder_options = { include_subgroups: params[:include_subgroups], only_owned: true }
GroupProjectsFinder.new(group: group, current_user: current_user, options: finder_options).execute
else
ProjectsFinder.new(current_user: current_user).execute
end
@projects = projects.with_feature_available_for_user(klass, current_user).reorder(nil)
Here we determine what projects to scope our data to, using three different
approaches. When a group is specified, we use GroupProjectsFinder
to retrieve
all the projects of that group. On the surface this seems harmless: it is easy
to use, and we only need two lines of code.
In reality, things can get hairy very quickly. For example, the query produced
by GroupProjectsFinder
may start out simple. Over time more and more
functionality is added to this (high level) interface. Instead of only
affecting the cases where this is necessary, it may also start affecting
IssuableFinder
in a negative way. For example, the query produced by
GroupProjectsFinder
may include unnecessary conditions. Since we're using a
finder here, we can't easily opt-out of that behavior. We could add options to
do so, but then we'd need as many options as we have features. Every option adds
two code paths, which means that for four features we have to cover 8 different
code paths.
A much more reliable (and pleasant) way of dealing with this, is to simply use
the underlying bits that make up GroupProjectsFinder
directly. This means we
may need a little bit more code in IssuableFinder
, but it also gives us much
more control and certainty. This means we might end up with something like this:
return @projects = project if project?
projects =
if current_user && params[:authorized_only].presence && !current_user_related?
current_user.authorized_projects
elsif group
current_user
.owned_groups(subgroups: params[:include_subgroups])
.projects
.any_additional_method_calls
.that_might_be_necessary
else
current_user
.projects_visible_to_user
.any_additional_method_calls
.that_might_be_necessary
end
@projects = projects.with_feature_available_for_user(klass, current_user).reorder(nil)
This is just a sketch, but it shows the general idea: we would use whatever the
GroupProjectsFinder
and ProjectsFinder
finders use under the hoods.
End goal
The guidelines in this document are meant to foster better code reuse, by clearly defining what can be reused where, and what to do when you can not reuse something. Clearly separating abstractions makes it harder to use the wrong one, makes it easier to debug the code, and (hopefully) results in fewer performance problems.
Abstractions
Now let's take a look at the various abstraction levels available, and what they can (or cannot) reuse. For this we can use the following table, which defines the various abstractions and what they can (not) reuse:
Abstraction | Service classes | Finders | Presenters | Serializers | Model instance method | Model class methods | Active Record | Worker |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controller | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Service class | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Finder | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Presenter | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Serializer | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Model class method | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Model instance method | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Worker | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Controllers
Everything in app/controllers
.
Controllers should not do much work on their own, instead they simply pass input to other classes and present the results.
Grape endpoint
Everything in lib/api
.
Service classes
Everything that resides in app/services
.
In Service classes the use of execute
and #execute
is preferred over call
and #call
.
ServiceResponse
Service classes usually have an execute
method, which can return a
ServiceResponse
. You can use ServiceResponse.success
and
ServiceResponse.error
to return a response in execute
method.
In a successful case:
response = ServiceResponse.success(message: 'Branch was deleted')
response.success? # => true
response.error? # => false
response.status # => :success
response.message # => 'Branch was deleted'
In a failed case:
response = ServiceResponse.error(message: 'Unsupported operation')
response.success? # => false
response.error? # => true
response.status # => :error
response.message # => 'Unsupported operation'
An additional payload can also be attached:
response = ServiceResponse.success(payload: { issue: issue })
response.payload[:issue] # => issue
Finders
Everything in app/finders
, typically used for retrieving data from a database.
Finders can not reuse other finders in an attempt to better control the SQL queries they produce.
Presenters
Everything in app/presenters
, used for exposing complex data to a Rails view,
without having to create many instance variables.
Serializers
Everything in app/serializers
, used for presenting the response to a request,
typically in JSON.
Model class methods
These are class methods defined by GitLab itself, including the following methods provided by Active Record:
find
find_by_id
delete_all
destroy
destroy_all
Any other methods such as find_by(some_column: X)
are not included, and
instead fall under the "Active Record" abstraction.
Model instance methods
Instance methods defined on Active Record models by GitLab itself. Methods provided by Active Record are not included, except for the following methods:
save
update
destroy
delete
Active Record
The API provided by Active Record itself, such as the where
method, save
,
delete_all
, etc.
Worker
Everything in app/workers
.
Use SomeWorker.perform_async
or SomeWorker.perform_in
to schedule Sidekiq
jobs. Never directly invoke a worker using SomeWorker.new.perform
.