debian-mirror-gitlab/doc/development/service_ping/implement.md

stage	group	info
Analytics	Product Intelligence	To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments

Implement Service Ping

Service Ping consists of two kinds of data:

• Counters: Track how often a certain event happened over time, such as how many CI/CD pipelines have run. They are monotonic and usually trend up.
• Observations: Facts collected from one or more GitLab instances and can carry arbitrary data. There are no general guidelines for how to collect those, due to the individual nature of that data.

To implement a new metric in Service Ping, follow these steps:

1. Implement the required counter
2. Name and place the metric
3. Test counters manually using your Rails console
4. Generate the SQL query
5. Optimize queries with Database Lab
6. Add the metric definition to the Metrics Dictionary
7. Add the metric to the Versions Application
8. Create a merge request
9. Verify your metric
10. Set up and test Service Ping locally

Instrumentation classes

NOTE: Implementing metrics directly in usage_data.rb is deprecated. When you add or change a Service Ping Metric, you must migrate metrics to instrumentation classes. For information about the progress on migrating Service Ping metrics, see this epic.

For example, we have the following instrumentation class: lib/gitlab/usage/metrics/instrumentations/count_boards_metric.rb.

You should add it to usage_data.rb as follows:

boards: add_metric('CountBoardsMetric', time_frame: 'all'),

Types of counters

There are several types of counters for metrics:

• Batch counters: Used for counts, sums, and averages.
• Redis counters: Used for in-memory counts.
• Alternative counters: Used for settings and configurations.

NOTE: Only use the provided counter methods. Each counter method contains a built-in fail-safe mechanism that isolates each counter to avoid breaking the entire Service Ping process.

Batch counters

For large tables, PostgreSQL can take a long time to count rows due to MVCC (Multi-version Concurrency Control). Batch counting is a counting method where a single large query is broken into multiple smaller queries. For example, instead of a single query querying 1,000,000 records, with batch counting, you can execute 100 queries of 10,000 records each. Batch counting is useful for avoiding database timeouts as each batch query is significantly shorter than one single long running query.

For GitLab.com, there are extremely large tables with 15 second query timeouts, so we use batch counting to avoid encountering timeouts. Here are the sizes of some GitLab.com tables:

Table	Row counts in millions
merge_request_diff_commits	2280
ci_build_trace_sections	1764
merge_request_diff_files	1082
events	514

Batch counting requires indexes on columns to calculate max, min, and range queries. In some cases, you must add a specialized index on the columns involved in a counter.

Ordinary batch counters

Create a new database metrics instrumentation class with count operation for a given ActiveRecord_Relation

Method:

add_metric('CountIssuesMetric', time_frame: 'all')

Examples:

Examples using usage_data.rb have been deprecated. We recommend to use instrumentation classes.

Distinct batch counters

Create a new database metrics instrumentation class with distinct_count operation for a given ActiveRecord_Relation.

Method:

add_metric('CountUsersAssociatingMilestonesToReleasesMetric', time_frame: 'all')

WARNING: Counting over non-unique columns can lead to performance issues. For more information, see the iterating tables in batches guide.

Examples:

Examples using usage_data.rb have been deprecated. We recommend to use instrumentation classes.

Sum batch operation

Sum the values of a given ActiveRecord_Relation on given column and handles errors. Handles the ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid error

Method:

add_metric('JiraImportsTotalImportedIssuesCountMetric')

Average batch operation

Average the values of a given ActiveRecord_Relation on given column and handles errors.

Method:

add_metric('CountIssuesWeightAverageMetric')

Examples:

Examples using usage_data.rb have been deprecated. We recommend to use instrumentation classes.

Grouping and batch operations

The count, distinct_count and sum batch counters can accept an ActiveRecord::Relation object, which groups by a specified column. With a grouped relation, the methods do batch counting, handle errors, and returns a hash table of key-value pairs.

Examples:

count(Namespace.group(:type))
# returns => {nil=>179, "Group"=>54}

distinct_count(Project.group(:visibility_level), :creator_id)
# returns => {0=>1, 10=>1, 20=>11}

sum(Issue.group(:state_id), :weight))
# returns => {1=>3542, 2=>6820}

Add operation

Sum the values given as parameters. Handles the StandardError. Returns -1 if any of the arguments are -1.

Method:

add(*args)

Examples:

project_imports = distinct_count(::Project.where.not(import_type: nil), :creator_id)
bulk_imports = distinct_count(::BulkImport, :user_id)

 add(project_imports, bulk_imports)

Estimated batch counters

Introduced in GitLab 13.7.

Estimated batch counter functionality handles ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid errors when used through the provided estimate_batch_distinct_count method. Errors return a value of -1.

WARNING: This functionality estimates a distinct count of a specific ActiveRecord_Relation in a given column, which uses the HyperLogLog algorithm. As the HyperLogLog algorithm is probabilistic, the results always include error. The highest encountered error rate is 4.9%.

When correctly used, the estimate_batch_distinct_count method enables efficient counting over columns that contain non-unique values, which cannot be assured by other counters.

estimate_batch_distinct_count method

Method:

estimate_batch_distinct_count(relation, column = nil, batch_size: nil, start: nil, finish: nil)

The method includes the following arguments:

• relation: The ActiveRecord_Relation to perform the count.
• column: The column to perform the distinct count. The default is the primary key.
• batch_size: From Gitlab::Database::PostgresHll::BatchDistinctCounter::DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE. Default value: 10,000.
• start: The custom start of the batch count, to avoid complex minimum calculations.
• finish: The custom end of the batch count to avoid complex maximum calculations.

The method includes the following prerequisites:

• The supplied relation must include the primary key defined as the numeric column. For example: id bigint NOT NULL.

• The estimate_batch_distinct_count can handle a joined relation. To use its ability to count non-unique columns, the joined relation must not have a one-to-many relationship, such as has_many :boards.

• Both start and finish arguments should always represent primary key relationship values, even if the estimated count refers to another column, for example:

    estimate_batch_distinct_count(::Note, :author_id, start: ::Note.minimum(:id), finish: ::Note.maximum(:id))
  

Examples:

1. Simple execution of estimated batch counter, with only relation provided, returned value represents estimated number of unique values in id column (which is the primary key) of Project relation:

     estimate_batch_distinct_count(::Project)
   

2. Execution of estimated batch counter, where provided relation has applied additional filter (.where(time_period)), number of unique values estimated in custom column (:author_id), and parameters: start and finish together apply boundaries that defines range of provided relation to analyze:

     estimate_batch_distinct_count(::Note.with_suggestions.where(time_period), :author_id, start: ::Note.minimum(:id), finish: ::Note.maximum(:id))
   

When instrumenting metric with usage of estimated batch counter please add _estimated suffix to its name, for example:

  "counts": {
    "ci_builds_estimated": estimate_batch_distinct_count(Ci::Build),
    ...

Redis counters

Handles ::Redis::CommandError and Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::BaseCounter::UnknownEvent. Returns -1 when a block is sent or hash with all values and -1 when a counter(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters) is sent. The different behavior is due to 2 different implementations of the Redis counter.

Method:

redis_usage_data(counter, &block)

Arguments:

• counter: a counter from Gitlab::UsageDataCounters, that has fallback_totals method implemented
• or a block: which is evaluated

Ordinary Redis counters

Example of implementation: Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::WikiPageCounter, using Redis methods INCR and GET.

Events are handled by counter classes in the Gitlab::UsageDataCounters namespace, inheriting from BaseCounter, that are either:

1. Listed in Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::COUNTERS to be then included in Gitlab::UsageData.

2. Specified in the metric definition using the RedisMetric instrumentation class by their prefix option to be picked up using the metric instrumentation framework. Refer to the Redis metrics documentation for an example implementation.

Inheriting classes are expected to override KNOWN_EVENTS and PREFIX constants to build event names and associated metrics. For example, for prefix issues and events array %w[create, update, delete], three metrics will be added to the Service Ping payload: counts.issues_create, counts.issues_update and counts.issues_delete.

UsageData API

You can use the UsageData API to track events. To track events, the usage_data_api feature flag must be enabled (set to default_enabled: true). Enabled by default in GitLab 13.7 and later.

UsageData API tracking

1. Track events using the UsageData API.

   Increment event count using an ordinary Redis counter, for a given event name.

   API requests are protected by checking for a valid CSRF token.

   POST /usage_data/increment_counter
   

   Attribute	Type	Required	Description
   event	string	yes	The event name to track.

   Response:

   • 200 if the event was tracked.
   • 400 Bad request if the event parameter is missing.
   • 401 Unauthorized if the user is not authenticated.
   • 403 Forbidden if an invalid CSRF token is provided.

2. Track events using the JavaScript/Vue API helper which calls the UsageData API.

   To track events, usage_data_api and usage_data_#{event_name} must be enabled.

   import api from '~/api';
   
   api.trackRedisCounterEvent('my_already_defined_event_name'),
   

Redis HLL counters

WARNING: HyperLogLog (HLL) is a probabilistic algorithm and its results always includes some small error. According to Redis documentation, data from used HLL implementation is "approximated with a standard error of 0.81%".

NOTE: A user's consent for usage_stats (User.single_user&.requires_usage_stats_consent?) is not checked during the data tracking stage due to performance reasons. Keys corresponding to those counters are present in Redis even if usage_stats_consent is still required. However, no metric is collected from Redis and reported back to GitLab as long as usage_stats_consent is required.

With Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter we have available data structures used to count unique values.

Implemented using Redis methods PFADD and PFCOUNT.

Add new events

1. Define events in known_events.

   Example event:

   - name: users_creating_epics
     aggregation: weekly
   

   Keys:

   • name: unique event name.

     Name format for Redis HLL events {hll_counters}_<name>

     See Metric name for a complete guide on metric naming suggestion.

     Example names: users_creating_epics, users_triggering_security_scans.

   • aggregation: may be set to a :daily or :weekly key. Defines how counting data is stored in Redis. Aggregation on a daily basis does not pull more fine grained data.

2. Use one of the following methods to track the event:

   • In the controller using the ProductAnalyticsTracking module and the following format:

     track_event(*controller_actions, name:, action:, label:, conditions: nil, destinations: [:redis_hll], &block)
     

     Arguments:

     • controller_actions: the controller actions to track.
     • name: the event name.
     • action: required if destination is `:snowplow. Action name for the triggered event. See event schema for more details.
     • label: required if destination is `:snowplow. Label for the triggered event. See event schema for more details.
     • conditions: optional custom conditions. Uses the same format as Rails callbacks.
     • destinations: optional list of destinations. Currently supports :redis_hll and :snowplow. Default: :redis_hll.
     • &block: optional block that computes and returns the custom_id that we want to track. This overrides the visitor_id.

     Example:

     # controller
     class ProjectsController < Projects::ApplicationController
       include ProductAnalyticsTracking
     
       skip_before_action :authenticate_user!, only: :show
       track_event :index, :show,
         name: 'users_visiting_projects',
         action: 'user_perform_visit',
         label: 'redis_hll_counters.users_visiting_project_monthly',
         destinations: %i[redis_hll snowplow]
     
       def index
         render html: 'index'
       end
     
      def new
        render html: 'new'
      end
     
      def show
        render html: 'show'
      end
     end
     

   • In the API using the increment_unique_values(event_name, values) helper method.

     Arguments:

     • event_name: the event name.
     • values: the values counted. Can be one value or an array of values.

     Example:

     get ':id/registry/repositories' do
       repositories = ContainerRepositoriesFinder.new(
         user: current_user, subject: user_group
       ).execute
     
       increment_unique_values('users_listing_repositories', current_user.id)
     
       present paginate(repositories), with: Entities::ContainerRegistry::Repository, tags: params[:tags], tags_count: params[:tags_count]
     end
     

   • Using track_usage_event(event_name, values) in services and GraphQL.

     Increment unique values count using Redis HLL, for a given event name.

     Examples:

     • Track usage event for an incident in a service
     • Track usage event for an incident in GraphQL

       track_usage_event(:incident_management_incident_created, current_user.id)
     

   • Using the UsageData API.

     Increment unique users count using Redis HLL, for a given event name.

     API requests are protected by checking for a valid CSRF token.

     POST /usage_data/increment_unique_users
     

     Attribute	Type	Required	Description
     event	string	yes	The event name to track

     Response:

     • 200 if the event was tracked, or if tracking failed for any reason.
     • 400 Bad request if an event parameter is missing.
     • 401 Unauthorized if the user is not authenticated.
     • 403 Forbidden if an invalid CSRF token is provided.

   • Using the JavaScript/Vue API helper, which calls the UsageData API.

     Example for an existing event already defined in known events:

     import api from '~/api';
     
     api.trackRedisHllUserEvent('my_already_defined_event_name'),
     

3. Get event data using Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.unique_events(event_names:, start_date:, end_date:, context: '').

   Arguments:

   • event_names: the list of event names.
   • start_date: start date of the period for which we want to get event data.
   • end_date: end date of the period for which we want to get event data.
   • context: context of the event. Allowed values are default, free, bronze, silver, gold, starter, premium, ultimate.

4. Testing tracking and getting unique events

Trigger events in rails console by using track_event method

Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.track_event('users_viewing_compliance_audit_events', values: 1)
Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.track_event('users_viewing_compliance_audit_events', values: [2, 3])

Next, get the unique events for the current week.

# Get unique events for metric for current_week
Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.unique_events(event_names: 'users_viewing_compliance_audit_events',
start_date: Date.current.beginning_of_week, end_date: Date.current.next_week)

Recommendations

We have the following recommendations for adding new events:

• Event aggregation: weekly.
• When adding new metrics, use a feature flag to control the impact. It's recommended to disable the new feature flag by default (set default_enabled: false).
• Events can be triggered using the UsageData API, which helps when there are > 10 events per change

Enable or disable Redis HLL tracking

We can disable tracking completely by using the global flag:

/chatops run feature set redis_hll_tracking true
/chatops run feature set redis_hll_tracking false

Known events are added automatically in Service Data payload

Service Ping adds all events known_events/*.yml to Service Data generation under the redis_hll_counters key. This column is stored in version-app as a JSON. For each event we add metrics for the weekly and monthly time frames, and totals for each where applicable:

• #{event_name}_weekly: Data for 7 days for daily aggregation events and data for the last complete week for weekly aggregation events.
• #{event_name}_monthly: Data for 28 days for daily aggregation events and data for the last 4 complete weeks for weekly aggregation events.

Example of redis_hll_counters data:

{:redis_hll_counters=>
  {"compliance"=>
    {"users_viewing_compliance_dashboard_weekly"=>0,
     "users_viewing_compliance_dashboard_monthly"=>0,
     "users_viewing_compliance_audit_events_weekly"=>0,
     "users_viewing_audit_events_monthly"=>0,
     "compliance_total_unique_counts_weekly"=>0,
     "compliance_total_unique_counts_monthly"=>0},
 "analytics"=>
    {"users_viewing_analytics_group_devops_adoption_weekly"=>0,
     "users_viewing_analytics_group_devops_adoption_monthly"=>0,
     "analytics_total_unique_counts_weekly"=>0,
     "analytics_total_unique_counts_monthly"=>0},
   "ide_edit"=>
    {"users_editing_by_web_ide_weekly"=>0,
     "users_editing_by_web_ide_monthly"=>0,
     "users_editing_by_sfe_weekly"=>0,
     "users_editing_by_sfe_monthly"=>0,
     "ide_edit_total_unique_counts_weekly"=>0,
     "ide_edit_total_unique_counts_monthly"=>0}
 }
}

Example:

# Redis Counters
redis_usage_data(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::WikiPageCounter)

# Define events in common.yml https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/common.yml

# Tracking events
Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.track_event('users_expanding_vulnerabilities', values: visitor_id)

# Get unique events for metric
redis_usage_data { Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.unique_events(event_names: 'users_expanding_vulnerabilities', start_date: 28.days.ago, end_date: Date.current) }

Alternative counters

Handles StandardError and fallbacks into -1 this way not all measures fail if we encounter one exception. Mainly used for settings and configurations.

Method:

alt_usage_data(value = nil, fallback: -1, &block)

Arguments:

• value: a static value in which case the value is returned.
• or a block: which is evaluated
• fallback: -1: the common value used for any metrics that are failing.

Example:

alt_usage_data { Gitlab::VERSION }
alt_usage_data { Gitlab::CurrentSettings.uuid }
alt_usage_data(999)

Add counters to build new metrics

When adding the results of two counters, use the add Service Data method that handles fallback values and exceptions. It also generates a valid SQL export.

Example:

add(User.active, User.bot)

Prometheus queries

In those cases where operational metrics should be part of Service Ping, a database or Redis query is unlikely to provide useful data. Instead, Prometheus might be more appropriate, because most GitLab architectural components publish metrics to it that can be queried back, aggregated, and included as Service Data.

NOTE: Prometheus as a data source for Service Ping is only available for single-node Omnibus installations that are running the bundled Prometheus instance.

To query Prometheus for metrics, a helper method is available to yield a fully configured PrometheusClient, given it is available as per the note above:

with_prometheus_client do |client|
  response = client.query('<your query>')
  ...
end

Refer to the PrometheusClient definition for how to use its API to query for data.

Fallback values for Service Ping

We return fallback values in these cases:

Case	Value
Deprecated Metric (Removed with version 14.3)	-1000
Timeouts, general failures	-1
Standard errors in counters	-2
Histogram metrics failure	{ '-1' => -1 }

Test counters manually using your Rails console

# count
Gitlab::UsageData.count(User.active)
Gitlab::UsageData.count(::Clusters::Cluster.aws_installed.enabled, :cluster_id)

# count distinct
Gitlab::UsageData.distinct_count(::Project, :creator_id)
Gitlab::UsageData.distinct_count(::Note.with_suggestions.where(time_period), :author_id, start: ::User.minimum(:id), finish: ::User.maximum(:id))

Generate the SQL query

Your Rails console returns the generated SQL queries. For example:

pry(main)> Gitlab::UsageData.count(User.active)
   (2.6ms)  SELECT "features"."key" FROM "features"
   (15.3ms)  SELECT MIN("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
   (2.4ms)  SELECT MAX("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
   (1.9ms)  SELECT COUNT("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4)) AND "users"."id" BETWEEN 1 AND 100000

Optimize queries with Database Lab

Database Lab is a service that uses a production clone to test queries.

• GitLab.com's production database has a 15 second timeout.
• Any single query must stay below the 1 second execution time with cold caches.
• Add a specialized index on columns involved to reduce the execution time.

To understand the query's execution, we add the following information to a merge request description:

• For counters that have a time_period test, we add information for both:
  • time_period = {} for all time periods.
  • time_period = { created_at: 28.days.ago..Time.current } for the last 28 days.
• Execution plan and query time before and after optimization.
• Query generated for the index and time.
• Migration output for up and down execution.

For more details, see the database review guide.

Optimization recommendations and examples

• Use specialized indexes. For examples, see these merge requests:
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
• Use defined start and finish. These values can be memoized and reused, as in this example merge request.
• Avoid joins and unnecessary complexity in your queries. See this example merge request as an example.
• Set a custom batch_size for distinct_count, as in this example merge request.

Add the metric definition

See the Metrics Dictionary guide for more information.

Add the metric to the Versions Application

Check if the new metric must be added to the Versions Application. See the usage_data schema and Service Data parameters accepted. Any metrics added under the counts key are saved in the stats column.

Create a merge request

Create a merge request for the new Service Ping metric, and do the following:

• Add the feature label to the merge request. A metric is a user-facing change and is part of expanding the Service Ping feature.
• Add a changelog entry that complies with the changelog entries guide.
• Ask for a Product Intelligence review. On GitLab.com, we have DangerBot set up to monitor Product Intelligence related files and recommend a Product Intelligence review.

Verify your metric

On GitLab.com, the Product Intelligence team regularly monitors Service Ping. They may alert you that your metrics need further optimization to run quicker and with greater success.

The Service Ping JSON payload for GitLab.com is shared in the #g_product_intelligence Slack channel every week.

You may also use the Service Ping QA dashboard to check how well your metric performs. The dashboard allows filtering by GitLab version, by "Self-managed" and "SaaS", and shows you how many failures have occurred for each metric. Whenever you notice a high failure rate, you can re-optimize your metric.

Use Metrics Dictionary copy query to clipboard feature to get a query ready to run in Sisense for a specific metric.

Set up and test Service Ping locally

To set up Service Ping locally, you must:

1. Set up local repositories.
2. Test local setup.
3. Optional. Test Prometheus-based Service Ping.

Set up local repositories

1. Clone and start GitLab.
2. Clone and start Versions Application. Make sure you run docker-compose up to start a PostgreSQL and Redis instance.
3. Point GitLab to the Versions Application endpoint instead of the default endpoint:
   1. Open service_ping/submit_service.rb locally and modify STAGING_BASE_URL.
   2. Set it to the local Versions Application URL: http://localhost:3000.

Test local setup

1. Using the gitlab Rails console, manually trigger Service Ping:

   GitlabServicePingWorker.new.perform('triggered_from_cron' => false)
   

2. Use the versions Rails console to check the Service Ping was successfully received, parsed, and stored in the Versions database:

   UsageData.last
   

Test Prometheus-based Service Ping

If the data submitted includes metrics queried from Prometheus you want to inspect and verify, you must:

• Ensure that a Prometheus server is running locally.
• Ensure the respective GitLab components are exporting metrics to the Prometheus server.

If you do not need to test data coming from Prometheus, no further action is necessary. Service Ping should degrade gracefully in the absence of a running Prometheus server.

Three kinds of components may export data to Prometheus, and are included in Service Ping:

• node_exporter: Exports node metrics from the host machine.
• gitlab-exporter: Exports process metrics from various GitLab components.
• Other various GitLab services, such as Sidekiq and the Rails server, which export their own metrics.

Test with an Omnibus container

This is the recommended approach to test Prometheus-based Service Ping.

To verify your change, build a new Omnibus image from your code branch using CI/CD, download the image, and run a local container instance:

1. From your merge request, select the qa stage, then trigger the e2e:package-and-test job. This job triggers an Omnibus build in a downstream pipeline of the omnibus-gitlab-mirror project.
2. In the downstream pipeline, wait for the gitlab-docker job to finish.
3. Open the job logs and locate the full container name including the version. It takes the following form: registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/gitlab-ee:<VERSION>.
4. On your local machine, make sure you are signed in to the GitLab Docker registry. You can find the instructions for this in Authenticate to the GitLab Container Registry.
5. Once signed in, download the new image by using docker pull registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/gitlab-ee:<VERSION>
6. For more information about working with and running Omnibus GitLab containers in Docker, refer to GitLab Docker images documentation.

Test with GitLab development toolkits

This is the less recommended approach, because it comes with a number of difficulties when emulating a real GitLab deployment.

The GDK is not set up to run a Prometheus server or node_exporter alongside other GitLab components. If you would like to do so, Monitoring the GDK with Prometheus is a good start.

The GCK has limited support for testing Prometheus based Service Ping. By default, it comes with a fully configured Prometheus service that is set up to scrape a number of components. However, it has the following limitations:

• It does not run a gitlab-exporter instance, so several process_* metrics from services such as Gitaly may be missing.
• While it runs a node_exporter, docker-compose services emulate hosts, meaning that it normally reports itself as not associated with any of the other running services. That is not how node metrics are reported in a production setup, where node_exporter always runs as a process alongside other GitLab components on any given node. For Service Ping, none of the node data would therefore appear to be associated to any of the services running, because they all appear to be running on different hosts. To alleviate this problem, the node_exporter in GCK was arbitrarily "assigned" to the web service, meaning only for this service node_* metrics appears in Service Ping.

Aggregated metrics

Introduced in GitLab 13.6.

WARNING: This feature is intended solely for internal GitLab use.

The aggregated metrics feature provides insight into the data attributes in a collection of Service Ping metrics. This aggregation allows you to count data attributes in events without counting each occurrence of the same data attribute in multiple events. For example, you can aggregate the number of users who perform several actions, such as creating a new issue and opening a new merge request. You can then count each user that performed any combination of these actions.

Defining aggregated metric via metric YAML definition

To add data for aggregated metrics to the Service Ping payload, create metric YAML definition file following Aggregated metric instrumentation guide.

Redis sourced aggregated metrics

Introduced in GitLab 13.6.

To declare the aggregate of events collected with Redis HLL Counters, you must fulfill the following requirements:

1. All events listed at events attribute must come from known_events/*.yml files.
2. All events listed at events attribute must have the same aggregation attribute.
3. time_frame does not include all value, which is unavailable for Redis sourced aggregated metrics.

While it is possible to aggregate EE-only events together with events that occur in all GitLab editions, it's important to remember that doing so may produce high variance between data collected from EE and CE GitLab instances.

Database sourced aggregated metrics

Introduced in GitLab 13.9.

To declare an aggregate of metrics based on events collected from database, follow these steps:

1. Persist the metrics for aggregation.
2. Add new aggregated metric definition.

Persist metrics for aggregation

Only metrics calculated with Estimated Batch Counters can be persisted for database sourced aggregated metrics. To persist a metric, inject a Ruby block into the estimate_batch_distinct_count method. This block should invoke the Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Aggregates::Sources::PostgresHll.save_aggregated_metrics method, which stores estimate_batch_distinct_count results for future use in aggregated metrics.

The Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Aggregates::Sources::PostgresHll.save_aggregated_metrics method accepts the following arguments:

• metric_name: The name of metric to use for aggregations. Should be the same as the key under which the metric is added into Service Ping.
• recorded_at_timestamp: The timestamp representing the moment when a given Service Ping payload was collected. You should use the convenience method recorded_at to fill recorded_at_timestamp argument, like this: recorded_at_timestamp: recorded_at
• time_period: The time period used to build the relation argument passed into estimate_batch_distinct_count. To collect the metric with all available historical data, set a nil value as time period: time_period: nil.
• data: HyperLogLog buckets structure representing unique entries in relation. The estimate_batch_distinct_count method always passes the correct argument into the block, so data argument must always have a value equal to block argument, like this: data: result

Example metrics persistence:

class UsageData
  def count_secure_pipelines(time_period)
    ...
    relation = ::Security::Scan.by_scan_types(scan_type).where(time_period)

    pipelines_with_secure_jobs['dependency_scanning_pipeline'] = estimate_batch_distinct_count(relation, :pipeline_id, batch_size: 1000, start: start_id, finish: finish_id) do |result|
      ::Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Aggregates::Sources::PostgresHll
        .save_aggregated_metrics(metric_name: 'dependency_scanning_pipeline', recorded_at_timestamp: recorded_at, time_period: time_period, data: result)
    end
  end
end

Add new aggregated metric definition

After all metrics are persisted, you can add an aggregated metric definition following Aggregated metric instrumentation guide. To declare the aggregate of metrics collected with Estimated Batch Counters, you must fulfill the following requirements:

• Metrics names listed in the events: attribute, have to use the same names you passed in the metric_name argument while persisting metrics in previous step.
• Every metric listed in the events: attribute, has to be persisted for every selected time_frame: value.