261 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
261 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: Verify
|
|
group: Pipeline Execution
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
type: reference
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Pipeline efficiency **(FREE)**
|
|
|
|
[CI/CD Pipelines](index.md) are the fundamental building blocks for [GitLab CI/CD](../index.md).
|
|
Making pipelines more efficient helps you save developer time, which:
|
|
|
|
- Speeds up your DevOps processes
|
|
- Reduces costs
|
|
- Shortens the development feedback loop
|
|
|
|
It's common that new teams or projects start with slow and inefficient pipelines,
|
|
and improve their configuration over time through trial and error. A better process is
|
|
to use pipeline features that improve efficiency right away, and get a faster software
|
|
development lifecycle earlier.
|
|
|
|
First ensure you are familiar with [GitLab CI/CD fundamentals](../introduction/index.md)
|
|
and understand the [quick start guide](../quick_start/index.md).
|
|
|
|
## Identify bottlenecks and common failures
|
|
|
|
The easiest indicators to check for inefficient pipelines are the runtimes of the jobs,
|
|
stages, and the total runtime of the pipeline itself. The total pipeline duration is
|
|
heavily influenced by the:
|
|
|
|
- [Size of the repository](../large_repositories/index.md)
|
|
- Total number of stages and jobs.
|
|
- Dependencies between jobs.
|
|
- The ["critical path"](#directed-acyclic-graphs-dag-visualization), which represents
|
|
the minimum and maximum pipeline duration.
|
|
|
|
Additional points to pay attention relate to [GitLab Runners](../runners/index.md):
|
|
|
|
- Availability of the runners and the resources they are provisioned with.
|
|
- Build dependencies and their installation time.
|
|
- [Container image size](#docker-images).
|
|
- Network latency and slow connections.
|
|
|
|
Pipelines frequently failing unnecessarily also causes slowdowns in the development
|
|
lifecycle. You should look for problematic patterns with failed jobs:
|
|
|
|
- Flaky unit tests which fail randomly, or produce unreliable test results.
|
|
- Test coverage drops and code quality correlated to that behavior.
|
|
- Failures that can be safely ignored, but that halt the pipeline instead.
|
|
- Tests that fail at the end of a long pipeline, but could be in an earlier stage,
|
|
causing delayed feedback.
|
|
|
|
## Pipeline analysis
|
|
|
|
Analyze the performance of your pipeline to find ways to improve efficiency. Analysis
|
|
can help identify possible blockers in the CI/CD infrastructure. This includes analyzing:
|
|
|
|
- Job workloads.
|
|
- Bottlenecks in the execution times.
|
|
- The overall pipeline architecture.
|
|
|
|
It's important to understand and document the pipeline workflows, and discuss possible
|
|
actions and changes. Refactoring pipelines may need careful interaction between teams
|
|
in the DevSecOps lifecycle.
|
|
|
|
Pipeline analysis can help identify issues with cost efficiency. For example, [runners](../runners/index.md)
|
|
hosted with a paid cloud service may be provisioned with:
|
|
|
|
- More resources than needed for CI/CD pipelines, wasting money.
|
|
- Not enough resources, causing slow runtimes and wasting time.
|
|
|
|
### Pipeline Insights
|
|
|
|
The [Pipeline success and duration charts](index.md#pipeline-success-and-duration-charts)
|
|
give information about pipeline runtime and failed job counts.
|
|
|
|
Tests like [unit tests](../testing/unit_test_reports.md), integration tests, end-to-end tests,
|
|
[code quality](../../user/project/merge_requests/code_quality.md) tests, and others
|
|
ensure that problems are automatically found by the CI/CD pipeline. There could be many
|
|
pipeline stages involved causing long runtimes.
|
|
|
|
You can improve runtimes by running jobs that test different things in parallel, in
|
|
the same stage, reducing overall runtime. The downside is that you need more runners
|
|
running simultaneously to support the parallel jobs.
|
|
|
|
The [testing levels for GitLab](../../development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md)
|
|
provide an example of a complex testing strategy with many components involved.
|
|
|
|
### Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) visualization
|
|
|
|
The [Directed Acyclic Graph](../directed_acyclic_graph/index.md) (DAG) visualization can help analyze the critical path in
|
|
the pipeline and understand possible blockers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Pipeline Monitoring
|
|
|
|
Global pipeline health is a key indicator to monitor along with job and pipeline duration.
|
|
[CI/CD analytics](index.md#pipeline-success-and-duration-charts) give a visual
|
|
representation of pipeline health.
|
|
|
|
Instance administrators have access to additional [performance metrics and self-monitoring](../../administration/monitoring/index.md).
|
|
|
|
You can fetch specific pipeline health metrics from the [API](../../api/index.md).
|
|
External monitoring tools can poll the API and verify pipeline health or collect
|
|
metrics for long term SLA analytics.
|
|
|
|
For example, the [GitLab CI Pipelines Exporter](https://github.com/mvisonneau/gitlab-ci-pipelines-exporter)
|
|
for Prometheus fetches metrics from the API and pipeline events. It can check branches in projects automatically
|
|
and get the pipeline status and duration. In combination with a Grafana dashboard,
|
|
this helps build an actionable view for your operations team. Metric graphs can also
|
|
be embedded into incidents making problem resolving easier. Additionally, it can also export metrics about jobs and environments.
|
|
|
|
If you use the GitLab CI Pipelines Exporter, you should start with the [example configuration](https://github.com/mvisonneau/gitlab-ci-pipelines-exporter/blob/main/docs/configuration_syntax.md).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can use a monitoring tool that can execute scripts, like
|
|
[`check_gitlab`](https://gitlab.com/6uellerBpanda/check_gitlab) for example.
|
|
|
|
#### Runner monitoring
|
|
|
|
You can also [monitor CI runners](https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/monitoring/) on
|
|
their host systems, or in clusters like Kubernetes. This includes checking:
|
|
|
|
- Disk and disk IO
|
|
- CPU usage
|
|
- Memory
|
|
- Runner process resources
|
|
|
|
The [Prometheus Node Exporter](https://prometheus.io/docs/guides/node-exporter/)
|
|
can monitor runners on Linux hosts, and [`kube-state-metrics`](https://github.com/kubernetes/kube-state-metrics)
|
|
runs in a Kubernetes cluster.
|
|
|
|
You can also test [GitLab Runner auto-scaling](https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/configuration/autoscale.html)
|
|
with cloud providers, and define offline times to reduce costs.
|
|
|
|
#### Dashboards and incident management
|
|
|
|
Use your existing monitoring tools and dashboards to integrate CI/CD pipeline monitoring,
|
|
or build them from scratch. Ensure that the runtime data is actionable and useful
|
|
in teams, and operations/SREs are able to identify problems early enough.
|
|
[Incident management](../../operations/incident_management/index.md) can help here too,
|
|
with embedded metric charts and all valuable details to analyze the problem.
|
|
|
|
### Storage usage
|
|
|
|
Review the storage use of the following to help analyze costs and efficiency:
|
|
|
|
- [Job artifacts](job_artifacts.md) and their [`expire_in`](../yaml/index.md#artifactsexpire_in)
|
|
configuration. If kept for too long, storage usage grows and could slow pipelines down.
|
|
- [Container registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md) usage.
|
|
- [Package registry](../../user/packages/package_registry/index.md) usage.
|
|
|
|
## Pipeline configuration
|
|
|
|
Make careful choices when configuring pipelines to speed up pipelines and reduce
|
|
resource usage. This includes making use of GitLab CI/CD's built-in features that
|
|
make pipelines run faster and more efficiently.
|
|
|
|
### Reduce how often jobs run
|
|
|
|
Try to find which jobs don't need to run in all situations, and use pipeline configuration
|
|
to stop them from running:
|
|
|
|
- Use the [`interruptible`](../yaml/index.md#interruptible) keyword to stop old pipelines
|
|
when they are superseded by a newer pipeline.
|
|
- Use [`rules`](../yaml/index.md#rules) to skip tests that aren't needed. For example,
|
|
skip backend tests when only the frontend code is changed.
|
|
- Run non-essential [scheduled pipelines](schedules.md) less frequently.
|
|
|
|
### Fail fast
|
|
|
|
Ensure that errors are detected early in the CI/CD pipeline. A job that takes a very long
|
|
time to complete keeps a pipeline from returning a failed status until the job completes.
|
|
|
|
Design pipelines so that jobs that can [fail fast](../../user/project/merge_requests/fail_fast_testing.md)
|
|
run earlier. For example, add an early stage and move the syntax, style linting,
|
|
Git commit message verification, and similar jobs in there.
|
|
|
|
Decide if it's important for long jobs to run early, before fast feedback from
|
|
faster jobs. The initial failures may make it clear that the rest of the pipeline
|
|
shouldn't run, saving pipeline resources.
|
|
|
|
### Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG)
|
|
|
|
In a basic configuration, jobs always wait for all other jobs in earlier stages to complete
|
|
before running. This is the simplest configuration, but it's also the slowest in most
|
|
cases. [Directed Acyclic Graphs](../directed_acyclic_graph/index.md) and
|
|
[parent/child pipelines](parent_child_pipelines.md) are more flexible and can
|
|
be more efficient, but can also make pipelines harder to understand and analyze.
|
|
|
|
### Caching
|
|
|
|
Another optimization method is to [cache](../caching/index.md) dependencies. If your
|
|
dependencies change rarely, like [NodeJS `/node_modules`](../caching/index.md#cache-nodejs-dependencies),
|
|
caching can make pipeline execution much faster.
|
|
|
|
You can use [`cache:when`](../yaml/index.md#cachewhen) to cache downloaded dependencies
|
|
even when a job fails.
|
|
|
|
### Docker Images
|
|
|
|
Downloading and initializing Docker images can be a large part of the overall runtime
|
|
of jobs.
|
|
|
|
If a Docker image is slowing down job execution, analyze the base image size and network
|
|
connection to the registry. If GitLab is running in the cloud, look for a cloud container
|
|
registry offered by the vendor. In addition to that, you can make use of the
|
|
[GitLab container registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md) which can be accessed
|
|
by the GitLab instance faster than other registries.
|
|
|
|
#### Optimize Docker images
|
|
|
|
Build optimized Docker images because large Docker images use up a lot of space and
|
|
take a long time to download with slower connection speeds. If possible, avoid using
|
|
one large image for all jobs. Use multiple smaller images, each for a specific task,
|
|
that download and run faster.
|
|
|
|
Try to use custom Docker images with the software pre-installed. It's usually much
|
|
faster to download a larger pre-configured image than to use a common image and install
|
|
software on it each time. Docker's [Best practices for writing Dockerfiles](https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/)
|
|
has more information about building efficient Docker images.
|
|
|
|
Methods to reduce Docker image size:
|
|
|
|
- Use a small base image, for example `debian-slim`.
|
|
- Do not install convenience tools like vim, curl, and so on, if they aren't strictly needed.
|
|
- Create a dedicated development image.
|
|
- Disable man pages and docs installed by packages to save space.
|
|
- Reduce the `RUN` layers and combine software installation steps.
|
|
- Use [multi-stage builds](https://blog.alexellis.io/mutli-stage-docker-builds/)
|
|
to merge multiple Dockerfiles that use the builder pattern into one Dockerfile, which can reduce image size.
|
|
- If using `apt`, add `--no-install-recommends` to avoid unnecessary packages.
|
|
- Clean up caches and files that are no longer needed at the end. For example
|
|
`rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*` for Debian and Ubuntu, or `yum clean all` for RHEL and CentOS.
|
|
- Use tools like [dive](https://github.com/wagoodman/dive) or [DockerSlim](https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim)
|
|
to analyze and shrink images.
|
|
|
|
To simplify Docker image management, you can create a dedicated group for managing
|
|
[Docker images](../docker/index.md) and test, build and publish them with CI/CD pipelines.
|
|
|
|
## Test, document, and learn
|
|
|
|
Improving pipelines is an iterative process. Make small changes, monitor the effect,
|
|
then iterate again. Many small improvements can add up to a large increase in pipeline
|
|
efficiency.
|
|
|
|
It can help to document the pipeline design and architecture. You can do this with
|
|
[Mermaid charts in Markdown](../../user/markdown.md#mermaid) directly in the GitLab
|
|
repository.
|
|
|
|
Document CI/CD pipeline problems and incidents in issues, including research done
|
|
and solutions found. This helps onboarding new team members, and also helps
|
|
identify recurring problems with CI pipeline efficiency.
|
|
|
|
### Learn More
|
|
|
|
- [CI Monitoring Webcast Slides](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ONwIIzRB7GWX-WOSziIIv8fz1ngqv77HO1yVfRooOHM/edit?usp=sharing)
|
|
- [GitLab.com Monitoring Handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/monitoring/)
|
|
- [Buildings dashboards for operational visibility](https://aws.amazon.com/builders-library/building-dashboards-for-operational-visibility/)
|