Pirate Praveen b439698ad0 New upstream version 15.8.4+ds1

2023-03-17 16:20:25 +05:30

32 KiB

Raw Blame History

stage	group	info
none	Engineering Productivity	To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments

Pipelines for the GitLab project

Pipelines for gitlab-org/gitlab (as well as the dev instance's) is configured in the usual .gitlab-ci.yml which itself includes files under .gitlab/ci/ for easier maintenance.

We're striving to dogfood GitLab CI/CD features and best-practices as much as possible.

Predictive test jobs before a merge request is approved

To reduce the pipeline cost and shorten the job duration, before a merge request is approved, the pipeline will run a predictive set of RSpec & Jest tests that are likely to fail for the merge request changes.

After a merge request has been approved, the pipeline would contain the full RSpec & Jest tests. This will ensure that all tests have been run before a merge request is merged.

Overview of the GitLab project test dependency

To understand how the predictive test jobs are executed, we need to understand the dependency between GitLab code (frontend and backend) and the respective tests (Jest and RSpec). This dependency can be visualized in the following diagram:

flowchart LR
    subgraph frontend
    fe["Frontend code"]--tested with-->jest
    end
    subgraph backend
    be["Backend code"]--tested with-->rspec
    end

    be--generates-->fixtures["frontend fixtures"]
    fixtures--used in-->jest

In summary:

RSpec tests are dependent on the backend code.
Jest tests are dependent on both frontend and backend code, the latter through the frontend fixtures.

RSpec predictive jobs

Determining predictive RSpec test files in a merge request

To identify the RSpec tests that are likely to fail in a merge request, we use the test_file_finder gem, with two strategies:

dynamic mapping from test coverage tracing (generated via the Crystalball gem) (see where it's used)
static mapping maintained in the tests.yml file for special cases that cannot be mapped via coverage tracing (see where it's used)

The test mappings contain a map of each source files to a list of test files which is dependent of the source file.

In the detect-tests job, we use this mapping to identify the predictive tests needed for the current merge request.

Later on in the rspec fail-fast job, we run the predictive tests for the current merge request.

Exceptional cases

In addition, there are a few circumstances where we would always run the full RSpec tests:

when the pipeline:run-all-rspec label is set on the merge request. This label will trigger all RSpec tests including those run in the as-if-foss jobs.
when the pipeline:mr-approved label is set on the merge request, and if the code changes satisfy the backend-patterns rule. Note that this label is assigned by triage automation when the merge request is approved by any reviewer. It is not recommended to apply this label manually.
when the merge request is created by an automation (for example, Gitaly update or MR targeting a stable branch)
when the merge request is created in a security mirror
when any CI configuration file is changed (for example, .gitlab-ci.yml or .gitlab/ci/**/*)

Jest predictive jobs

Determining predictive Jest test files in a merge request

To identify the jest tests that are likely to fail in a merge request, we pass a list of all the changed files into jest using the --findRelatedTests option. In this mode, jest would resolve all the dependencies of related to the changed files, which include test files that have these files in the dependency chain.

Exceptional cases

In addition, there are a few circumstances where we would always run the full Jest tests:

when the pipeline:run-all-jest label is set on the merge request
when the merge request is created by an automation (for example, Gitaly update or MR targeting a stable branch)
when the merge request is created in a security mirror
when relevant CI configuration file is changed (.gitlab/ci/rules.gitlab-ci.yml, .gitlab/ci/frontend.gitlab-ci.yml)
when any frontend dependency file is changed (for example, package.json, yarn.lock, config/webpack.config.js, config/helpers/**/*.js)
when any vendored JavaScript file is changed (for example, vendor/assets/javascripts/**/*)

The rules definitions for full Jest tests are defined at .frontend:rules:jest in rules.gitlab-ci.yml.

Fork pipelines

We run only the predictive RSpec & Jest jobs for fork pipelines, unless the pipeline:run-all-rspec label is set on the MR. The goal is to reduce the CI/CD minutes consumed by fork pipelines.

See the experiment issue.

Fail-fast job in merge request pipelines

To provide faster feedback when a merge request breaks existing tests, we are experimenting with a fail-fast mechanism.

An rspec fail-fast job is added in parallel to all other rspec jobs in a merge request pipeline. This job runs the tests that are directly related to the changes in the merge request.

If any of these tests fail, the rspec fail-fast job fails, triggering a fail-pipeline-early job to run. The fail-pipeline-early job:

Cancels the currently running pipeline and all in-progress jobs.
Sets pipeline to have status failed.

For example:

graph LR
    subgraph "prepare stage";
        A["detect-tests"]
    end

    subgraph "test stage";
        B["jest"];
        C["rspec migration"];
        D["rspec unit"];
        E["rspec integration"];
        F["rspec system"];
        G["rspec fail-fast"];
    end

    subgraph "post-test stage";
        Z["fail-pipeline-early"];
    end

    A --"artifact: list of test files"--> G
    G --"on failure"--> Z

The rspec fail-fast is a no-op if there are more than 10 test files related to the merge request. This prevents rspec fail-fast duration from exceeding the average rspec job duration and defeating its purpose.

This number can be overridden by setting a CI/CD variable named RSPEC_FAIL_FAST_TEST_FILE_COUNT_THRESHOLD.

Re-run previously failed tests in merge request pipelines

In order to reduce the feedback time after resolving failed tests for a merge request, the rspec rspec-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests and rspec rspec-ee-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests jobs run the failed tests from the previous MR pipeline.

This was introduced on August 25th 2021, with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/69053.

How it works?

The detect-previous-failed-tests job (prepare stage) detects the test files associated with failed RSpec jobs from the previous MR pipeline.
The rspec rspec-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests and rspec rspec-ee-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests jobs will run the test files gathered by the detect-previous-failed-tests job.

graph LR
    subgraph "prepare stage";
        A["detect-previous-failed-tests"]
    end

    subgraph "test stage";
        B["rspec rspec-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests"];
        C["rspec rspec-ee-pg12-rerun-previous-failed-tests"];
    end

    A --"artifact: list of test files"--> B & C

Faster feedback for some merge requests

Broken Master Fixes

When you need to fix a broken master, you can add the pipeline:expedite label to expedite the pipelines that run on the merge request.

Note that the merge request also needs to have the master:broken or master:foss-broken label set.

Revert MRs

To make your Revert MRs faster, use the revert MR template before you create your merge request. It will apply the pipeline:expedite label and others that will expedite the pipelines that run on the merge request.

The `~pipeline:expedite` label

When this label is assigned, the following steps of the CI/CD pipeline are skipped:

The e2e:package-and-test job.
The rspec:undercoverage job.
The entire Review Apps process.

Apply the label to the merge request, and run a new pipeline for the MR.

Test jobs

We have dedicated jobs for each testing level and each job runs depending on the changes made in your merge request. If you want to force all the RSpec jobs to run regardless of your changes, you can add the pipeline:run-all-rspec label to the merge request.

WARNING: Forcing all jobs on docs only related MRs would not have the prerequisite jobs and would lead to errors

Test suite parallelization

Our current RSpec tests parallelization setup is as follows:

The retrieve-tests-metadata job in the prepare stage ensures we have a knapsack/report-master.json file:
- The knapsack/report-master.json file is fetched from the latest main pipeline which runs update-tests-metadata (for now it's the 2-hourly maintenance scheduled master pipeline), if it's not here we initialize the file with {}.
Each [rspec|rspec-ee] [migration|unit|integration|system|geo] n m job are run with knapsack rspec and should have an evenly distributed share of tests:
- It works because the jobs have access to the knapsack/report-master.json since the "artifacts from all previous stages are passed by default".
- the jobs set their own report path to "knapsack/${TEST_TOOL}_${TEST_LEVEL}_${DATABASE}_${CI_NODE_INDEX}_${CI_NODE_TOTAL}_report.json".
- if knapsack is doing its job, test files that are run should be listed under Report specs, not under Leftover specs.
The update-tests-metadata job (which only runs on scheduled pipelines for the canonical project takes all the knapsack/rspec*.json files and merge them all together into a single knapsack/report-master.json file that is saved as artifact.

After that, the next pipeline uses the up-to-date knapsack/report-master.json file.

Flaky tests

Automatic skipping of flaky tests

Tests that are known to be flaky are skipped unless the $SKIP_FLAKY_TESTS_AUTOMATICALLY variable is set to false or if the ~"pipeline:run-flaky-tests" label is set on the MR.

See the experiment issue.

Automatic retry of failing tests in a separate process

Unless $RETRY_FAILED_TESTS_IN_NEW_PROCESS variable is set to false (true by default), RSpec tests that failed are automatically retried once in a separate RSpec process. The goal is to get rid of most side-effects from previous tests that may lead to a subsequent test failure.

We keep track of retried tests in the $RETRIED_TESTS_REPORT_FILE file saved as artifact by the rspec:flaky-tests-report job.

See the experiment issue.

Compatibility testing

By default, we run all tests with the versions that runs on GitLab.com.

Other versions (usually one back-compatible version, and one forward-compatible version) should be running in nightly scheduled pipelines.

Exceptions to this general guideline should be motivated and documented.

Single database testing

By default, all tests run with multiple databases.

We also run tests with a single database in nightly scheduled pipelines, and in merge requests that touch database-related files.

If you want to force tests to run with a single database, you can add the pipeline:run-single-db label to the merge request.

Monitoring

The GitLab test suite is monitored for the main branch, and any branch that includes rspec-profile in their name.

Logging

Rails logging to log/test.log is disabled by default in CI for performance reasons. To override this setting, provide the RAILS_ENABLE_TEST_LOG environment variable.

Review app jobs

Consult the Review Apps dedicated page for more information.

If you want to force a Review App to be deployed regardless of your changes, you can add the pipeline:run-review-app label to the merge request.

As-if-FOSS jobs

The * as-if-foss jobs run the GitLab test suite "as if FOSS", meaning as if the jobs would run in the context of gitlab-org/gitlab-foss. These jobs are only created in the following cases:

when the pipeline:run-as-if-foss label is set on the merge request
when the merge request is created in the gitlab-org/security/gitlab project
when any CI configuration file is changed (for example, .gitlab-ci.yml or .gitlab/ci/**/*)

The * as-if-foss jobs are run in addition to the regular EE-context jobs. They have the FOSS_ONLY='1' variable set and get the ee/ folder removed before the tests start running.

The intent is to ensure that a change doesn't introduce a failure after gitlab-org/gitlab is synced to gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.

As-if-JH cross project downstream pipeline

The start-as-if-jh job triggers a cross project downstream pipeline which runs the GitLab test suite "as if JiHu", meaning as if the pipeline would run in the context of GitLab JH. These jobs are only created in the following cases:

when the pipeline:run-as-if-jh label is set on the merge request

This pipeline runs under the context of a generated branch in the GitLab JH validation project, which is a mirror of the GitLab JH mirror.

The generated branch name is prefixed with as-if-jh/ along with the branch name in the merge request. This generated branch is based on the merge request branch, additionally adding changes downloaded from the corresponding JH branch on top to turn the whole pipeline as if JiHu.

The intent is to ensure that a change doesn't introduce a failure after GitLab is synchronized to GitLab JH.

When to consider applying `pipeline:run-as-if-jh` label

If a Ruby file is renamed and there's a corresponding prepend_mod line, it's likely that GitLab JH is relying on it and requires a corresponding change to rename the module or class it's prepending.

Corresponding JH branch

You can create a corresponding JH branch on GitLab JH by appending -jh to the branch name. If a corresponding JH branch is found, as-if-jh pipeline grabs files from the respective branch, rather than from the default branch main-jh.

NOTE: For now, CI will try to fetch the branch on the GitLab JH mirror, so it might take some time for the new JH branch to propagate to the mirror.

NOTE: While GitLab JH validation is a mirror of GitLab JH mirror, it does not include any corresponding JH branch beside the default main-jh. This is why when we want to fetch corresponding JH branch we should fetch it from the main mirror, rather than the validation project.

How as-if-JH pipeline was configured

The whole process looks like this:

flowchart TD
  subgraph "JiHuLab.com"
    JH["gitlab-cn/gitlab"]
  end

  subgraph "GitLab.com"
    Mirror["gitlab-org/gitlab-jh-mirrors/gitlab"]
    Validation["gitlab-org-sandbox/gitlab-jh-validation"]

    subgraph MR["gitlab-org/gitlab merge request"]
      Add["add-jh-files job"]
      Prepare["prepare-as-if-jh-branch job"]
      Add --"download artifacts"--> Prepare
    end

    Mirror --"pull mirror with master and main-jh"--> Validation
    Mirror --"download JiHu files with ADD_JH_FILES_TOKEN"--> Add
    Prepare --"push as-if-jh branches with AS_IF_JH_TOKEN"--> Validation
    Validation --> Pipeline["as-if-jh pipeline"]
  end

  JH --"pull mirror with corresponding JH branches"--> Mirror

Tokens set in the project variables

ADD_JH_FILES_TOKEN: This is a GitLab JH mirror project token with read_api permission, to be able to download JiHu files.
AS_IF_JH_TOKEN: This is a GitLab JH validation project token with write_repository permission, to push generated as-if-jh/* branch.

How we generate the as-if-JH branch

First add-jh-files job will download the required JiHu files from the corresponding JH branch, saving in artifacts. Next prepare-as-if-jh-branch job will create a new branch from the merge request branch, commit the changes, and finally push the branch to the validation project.

How we trigger and run the as-if-JH pipeline

After having the as-if-jh/* branch, start-as-if-jh job will trigger a pipeline in the validation project to run the cross-project downstream pipeline.

How the GitLab JH mirror project is set up

The GitLab JH mirror project is private and CI is disabled.

It's a pull mirror pulling from GitLab JH, mirroring all branches, overriding divergent refs, triggering no pipelines when mirror is updated.

The pulling user is @gitlab-jh-bot, who is a maintainer in the project. The credentials can be found in the 1password engineering vault.

No password is used from mirroring because GitLab JH is a public project.

How the GitLab JH validation project is set up

This GitLab JH validation project is public and CI is enabled, without any project variables.

It's a pull mirror pulling from GitLab JH mirror, mirroring only protected branches, master and main-jh, overriding divergent refs, triggering no pipelines when mirror is updated.

The pulling user is @gitlab-jh-validation-bot, who is a maintainer in the project, and also a reporter in the GitLab JH mirror. The credentials can be found in the 1password engineering vault.

A personal access token from @gitlab-jh-validation-bot with write_repository permission is used as the password to pull changes from the GitLab JH mirror. Username is set with gitlab-jh-validation-bot.

There is also a pipeline schedule to run maintenance pipelines with variable SCHEDULE_TYPE set to maintenance running every day, updating cache.

The default CI/CD configuration file is also set at jh/.gitlab-ci.yml so it runs exactly like GitLab JH.

Ruby 2.7 jobs

We're running Ruby 3.0 for the merge requests and the default branch. However, we're still running Ruby 2.7 for GitLab.com and there are older versions that we need to maintain. We need a way to still try out Ruby 2.7 in merge requests.

You can add the pipeline:run-in-ruby2 label to the merge request to switch the Ruby version used for running the whole test suite to 2.7. When you do this, the test suite will no longer run in Ruby 3.0 (default), and an additional job verify-ruby-3.0 will also run and always fail to remind us to remove the label and run in Ruby 3.0 before merging the merge request.

This should let us:

Test changes for Ruby 2.7
Make sure it will not break anything when it's merged into the default branch

`undercover` RSpec test

Introduced in GitLab 14.6.

The rspec:undercoverage job runs undercover to detect, and fail if any changes introduced in the merge request has zero coverage.

The rspec:undercoverage job obtains coverage data from the rspec:coverage job.

In the event of an emergency, or false positive from this job, add the pipeline:skip-undercoverage label to the merge request to allow this job to fail.

Troubleshooting `rspec:undercoverage` failures

The rspec:undercoverage job has known bugs that can cause false positive failures. You can test coverage locally to determine if it's safe to apply ~"pipeline:skip-undercoverage". For example, using <spec> as the name of the test causing the failure:

Run SIMPLECOV=1 bundle exec rspec <spec>.
Run scripts/undercoverage.

If these commands return undercover: ✅ No coverage is missing in latest changes then you can apply ~"pipeline:skip-undercoverage" to bypass pipeline failures.

Ruby versions testing

Our test suite runs against Ruby 3 in merge requests and default branch pipelines.

We also run our test suite against Ruby 2.7 on another 2-hourly scheduled pipelines, as GitLab.com still runs on Ruby 2.7.

PostgreSQL versions testing

Our test suite runs against PG12 as GitLab.com runs on PG12 and Omnibus defaults to PG12 for new installs and upgrades.

We do run our test suite against PG11 and PG13 on nightly scheduled pipelines.

We also run our test suite against PG11 upon specific database library changes in MRs and main pipelines (with the rspec db-library-code pg11 job).

Current versions testing

Where?	PostgreSQL version	Ruby version
Merge requests	12 (default version), 11 for DB library changes	3.0 (default version)
`master` branch commits	12 (default version), 11 for DB library changes	3.0 (default version)
`maintenance` scheduled pipelines for the `master` branch (every even-numbered hour)	12 (default version), 11 for DB library changes	3.0 (default version)
`maintenance` scheduled pipelines for the `ruby2` branch (every odd-numbered hour), see below.	12 (default version), 11 for DB library changes	2.7
`nightly` scheduled pipelines for the `master` branch	12 (default version), 11, 13	3.0 (default version)

There are 2 pipeline schedules used for testing Ruby 2.7. One is triggering a pipeline in ruby2-sync branch, which updates the ruby2 branch with latest master, and no pipelines will be triggered by this push. The other schedule is triggering a pipeline in ruby2 5 minutes after it, which is considered the maintenance schedule to run test suites and update cache.

Any changes in ruby2 are only for running the pipeline. It should never be merged back to master. Any other Ruby 2.7 changes should go into master directly, which should be compatible with Ruby 3.

Previously, ruby2-sync was using a project token stored in RUBY2_SYNC_TOKEN (now backed up in RUBY2_SYNC_TOKEN_NOT_USED), however due to various permissions issues, we ended up using an access token from gitlab-bot so now RUBY2_SYNC_TOKEN is actually an access token from gitlab-bot.

Long-term plan

We follow the PostgreSQL versions shipped with Omnibus GitLab:

PostgreSQL version	14.1 (July 2021)	14.2 (August 2021)	14.3 (September 2021)	14.4 (October 2021)	14.5 (November 2021)	14.6 (December 2021)
PG12	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`	MRs/`2-hour`/`nightly`
PG11	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`
PG13	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`	`nightly`

Redis versions testing

Our test suite runs against Redis 6 as GitLab.com runs on Redis 6 and Omnibus defaults to Redis 6 for new installs and upgrades.

We do run our test suite against Redis 5 on nightly scheduled pipelines, specifically when running backward-compatible and forward-compatible PostgreSQL jobs.

Current versions testing

Where?	Redis version
MRs	6
`default branch` (non-scheduled pipelines)	6
`nightly` scheduled pipelines	5

Pipelines types for merge requests

In general, pipelines for an MR fall into one of the following types (from shorter to longer), depending on the changes made in the MR:

Documentation pipeline: For MRs that touch documentation.
Backend pipeline: For MRs that touch backend code.
Frontend pipeline: For MRs that touch frontend code.
End-to-end pipeline: For MRs that touch code in the qa/ folder.

A "pipeline type" is an abstract term that mostly describes the "critical path" (for example, the chain of jobs for which the sum of individual duration equals the pipeline's duration). We use these "pipeline types" in metrics dashboards to detect what types and jobs need to be optimized first.

An MR that touches multiple areas would be associated with the longest type applicable. For instance, an MR that touches backend and frontend would fall into the "Frontend" pipeline type since this type takes longer to finish than the "Backend" pipeline type.

We use the rules: and needs: keywords extensively to determine the jobs that need to be run in a pipeline. Note that an MR that includes multiple types of changes would have a pipelines that include jobs from multiple types (for example, a combination of docs-only and code-only pipelines).

Following are graphs of the critical paths for each pipeline type. Jobs that aren't part of the critical path are omitted.

Documentation pipeline

Reference pipeline.

graph LR
  classDef criticalPath fill:#f66;

  1-3["docs-lint links (5 minutes)"];
  class 1-3 criticalPath;
  click 1-3 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=8356757&udv=0"

Backend pipeline

Reference pipeline.

graph RL;
  classDef criticalPath fill:#f66;

  1-3["compile-test-assets (6 minutes)"];
  class 1-3 criticalPath;
  click 1-3 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914317&udv=0"
  1-6["setup-test-env (4 minutes)"];
  click 1-6 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914315&udv=0"
  1-14["retrieve-tests-metadata"];
  click 1-14 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=8356697&udv=0"
  1-15["detect-tests"];
  click 1-15 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/EP---Jobs-Durations?widget=10113603&udv=1005715"

  2_5-1["rspec & db jobs (24 minutes)"];
  class 2_5-1 criticalPath;
  click 2_5-1 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations"
  2_5-1 --> 1-3 & 1-6 & 1-14 & 1-15;

  3_2-1["rspec:coverage (5.35 minutes)"];
  class 3_2-1 criticalPath;
  click 3_2-1 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=7248745&udv=0"
  3_2-1 -.->|"(don't use needs<br/>because of limitations)"| 2_5-1;

  4_3-1["rspec:undercoverage (3.5 minutes)"];
  class 4_3-1 criticalPath;
  click 4_3-1 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/EP---Jobs-Durations?widget=13446492&udv=1005715"
  4_3-1 --> 3_2-1;

Frontend pipeline

Reference pipeline.

graph RL;
  classDef criticalPath fill:#f66;

  1-2["build-qa-image (2 minutes)"];
  click 1-2 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914325&udv=0"
  1-5["compile-production-assets (16 minutes)"];
  class 1-5 criticalPath;
  click 1-5 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914312&udv=0"

  2_3-1["build-assets-image (1.3 minutes)"];
  class 2_3-1 criticalPath;
  2_3-1 --> 1-5

  2_6-1["start-review-app-pipeline (49 minutes)"];
  class 2_6-1 criticalPath;
  click 2_6-1 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations"
  2_6-1 --> 2_3-1 & 1-2;

End-to-end pipeline

Reference pipeline.

graph RL;
  classDef criticalPath fill:#f66;

  1-2["build-qa-image (2 minutes)"];
  click 1-2 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914325&udv=0"
  1-5["compile-production-assets (16 minutes)"];
  class 1-5 criticalPath;
  click 1-5 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914312&udv=0"
  1-15["detect-tests"];
  click 1-15 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/EP---Jobs-Durations?widget=10113603&udv=1005715"

  2_3-1["build-assets-image (1.3 minutes)"];
  class 2_3-1 criticalPath;
  2_3-1 --> 1-5

  2_4-1["e2e:package-and-test (102 minutes)"];
  class 2_4-1 criticalPath;
  click 2_4-1 "https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/652085/Engineering-Productivity---Pipeline-Build-Durations?widget=6914305&udv=0"
  2_4-1 --> 1-2 & 2_3-1 & 1-15;

CI configuration internals

See the dedicated CI configuration internals page.

Performance

See the dedicated CI configuration performance page.

Return to Development documentation

32 KiB Raw Blame History

Pipelines for the GitLab project

Predictive test jobs before a merge request is approved

Overview of the GitLab project test dependency

RSpec predictive jobs

Determining predictive RSpec test files in a merge request

Exceptional cases

Jest predictive jobs

Determining predictive Jest test files in a merge request

Exceptional cases

Fork pipelines

Fail-fast job in merge request pipelines

Re-run previously failed tests in merge request pipelines

How it works?

Faster feedback for some merge requests

Broken Master Fixes

Revert MRs

The ~pipeline:expedite label

Test jobs

Test suite parallelization

Flaky tests

Automatic skipping of flaky tests

Automatic retry of failing tests in a separate process

Compatibility testing

Single database testing

Monitoring

Logging

Review app jobs

As-if-FOSS jobs

As-if-JH cross project downstream pipeline

When to consider applying pipeline:run-as-if-jh label

Corresponding JH branch

How as-if-JH pipeline was configured

Tokens set in the project variables

How we generate the as-if-JH branch

How we trigger and run the as-if-JH pipeline

How the GitLab JH mirror project is set up

How the GitLab JH validation project is set up

Ruby 2.7 jobs

undercover RSpec test

Troubleshooting rspec:undercoverage failures

Ruby versions testing

PostgreSQL versions testing

Current versions testing

Long-term plan

Redis versions testing

Current versions testing

Pipelines types for merge requests

Documentation pipeline

Backend pipeline

Frontend pipeline

End-to-end pipeline

CI configuration internals

Performance

32 KiB

Raw Blame History

The `~pipeline:expedite` label

When to consider applying `pipeline:run-as-if-jh` label

`undercover` RSpec test

Troubleshooting `rspec:undercoverage` failures