368 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
368 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: Verify
|
|
group: Pipeline Authoring
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
comments: false
|
|
type: index, howto
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Migrating from Jenkins **(FREE)**
|
|
|
|
A lot of GitLab users have successfully migrated to GitLab CI/CD from Jenkins.
|
|
We've collected several resources here that you might find informative if you're just getting started.
|
|
Think of this page as a "GitLab CI/CD for Jenkins Users" guide.
|
|
|
|
The following list of recommended steps was created after observing organizations
|
|
that were able to quickly complete this migration:
|
|
|
|
1. Start by reading the GitLab CI/CD [Quick Start Guide](../quick_start/index.md) and [important product differences](#important-product-differences).
|
|
1. Learn the importance of [managing the organizational transition](#manage-organizational-transition).
|
|
1. [Add runners](../runners/index.md) to your GitLab instance.
|
|
1. Educate and enable your developers to independently perform the following steps in their projects:
|
|
1. Review the [Quick Start Guide](../quick_start/index.md) and [Pipeline Configuration Reference](../yaml/index.md).
|
|
1. Use the [Jenkins Wrapper](#jenkinsfile-wrapper) to temporarily maintain fragile Jenkins jobs.
|
|
1. Migrate the build and CI jobs and configure them to show results directly in your merge requests. They can use [Auto DevOps](../../topics/autodevops/index.md) as a starting point, and [customize](../../topics/autodevops/customize.md) or [decompose](../../topics/autodevops/customize.md#use-individual-components-of-auto-devops) the configuration as needed.
|
|
1. Add [Review Apps](../review_apps/index.md).
|
|
1. Migrate the deployment jobs using [cloud deployment templates](../cloud_deployment/index.md), adding [environments](../environments/index.md), and [deploy boards](../../user/project/deploy_boards.md).
|
|
1. Work to unwrap any jobs still running with the use of the Jenkins wrapper.
|
|
1. Take stock of any common CI/CD job definitions then create and share [templates](#templates) for them.
|
|
1. Check the [pipeline efficiency documentation](../pipelines/pipeline_efficiency.md)
|
|
to learn how to make your GitLab CI/CD pipelines faster and more efficient.
|
|
|
|
Watch the [Migrating from Jenkins to GitLab](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlEVGOpYF5Y) video for examples of how to:
|
|
|
|
- Convert a Jenkins pipeline into a GitLab CI/CD pipeline.
|
|
- Use Auto DevOps to test your code automatically.
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, read on for important information that helps you get the ball rolling. Welcome
|
|
to GitLab!
|
|
|
|
If you have questions that are not answered here, the [GitLab community forum](https://forum.gitlab.com/)
|
|
can be a great resource.
|
|
|
|
## Manage organizational transition
|
|
|
|
An important part of transitioning from Jenkins to GitLab is the cultural and organizational
|
|
changes that come with the move, and successfully managing them. A few
|
|
things we have found that help this are:
|
|
|
|
- Setting and communicating a clear vision of what your migration goals are helps
|
|
your users understand why the effort is worth it. The value is clear when
|
|
the work is done, but people need to be aware while it's in progress too.
|
|
- Sponsorship and alignment from the relevant leadership team helps with the point above.
|
|
- Spending time educating your users on what's different and sharing this document
|
|
with them helps ensure you are successful.
|
|
- Finding ways to sequence or delay parts of the migration can help a lot, but you
|
|
don't want to leave things in a non-migrated (or partially-migrated) state for too
|
|
long. To gain all the benefits of GitLab, moving your existing Jenkins setup over
|
|
as-is, including any current problems, isn't enough. You need to take advantage
|
|
of the improvements that GitLab offers, and this requires (eventually) updating
|
|
your implementation as part of the transition.
|
|
|
|
## JenkinsFile Wrapper
|
|
|
|
We are building a [JenkinsFile Wrapper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/jfr-container-builder/) which
|
|
you can use to run a complete Jenkins instance inside of a GitLab job, including plugins. This can help ease the process
|
|
of transition, by letting you delay the migration of less urgent pipelines for a period of time.
|
|
|
|
If you are interested in helping GitLab test the wrapper, join our [public testing issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/215675) for instructions and to provide your feedback.
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
|
|
If you have a paid GitLab subscription, the JenkinsFile Wrapper is not packaged with GitLab and falls outside of the scope of support. For more information, see the [Statement of Support](https://about.gitlab.com/support/statement-of-support/).
|
|
|
|
## Important product differences
|
|
|
|
Some high level differences between the products worth mentioning are:
|
|
|
|
- With GitLab you don't need a root `pipeline` keyword to wrap everything.
|
|
- The way pipelines are triggered and [trigger other pipelines](../yaml/index.md#trigger)
|
|
is different than Jenkins. GitLab pipelines can be triggered:
|
|
|
|
- on push
|
|
- on [schedule](../pipelines/schedules.md)
|
|
- from the [GitLab UI](../pipelines/index.md#run-a-pipeline-manually)
|
|
- by [API call](../triggers/index.md)
|
|
- by [webhook](../triggers/index.md#use-a-webhook)
|
|
- by [ChatOps](../chatops/index.md)
|
|
|
|
- You can control which jobs run in which cases, depending on how they are triggered,
|
|
with the [`rules` syntax](../yaml/index.md#rules).
|
|
- GitLab [pipeline scheduling concepts](../pipelines/schedules.md) are also different from Jenkins.
|
|
- You can reuse pipeline configurations using the [`include` keyword](../yaml/index.md#include)
|
|
and [templates](#templates). Your templates can be kept in a central repository (with different
|
|
permissions), and then any project can use them. This central project could also
|
|
contain scripts or other reusable code.
|
|
- You can also use the [`extends` keyword](../yaml/index.md#extends) to reuse configuration
|
|
in a single pipeline configuration.
|
|
- All jobs in a single stage always run in parallel, and all stages run in sequence.
|
|
Certain jobs might break this sequencing as needed with our [directed acyclic graph](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/47063)
|
|
feature.
|
|
- The [`parallel`](../yaml/index.md#parallel) keyword can automatically parallelize tasks,
|
|
like tests that support parallelization.
|
|
- Normally all jobs in a single stage run in parallel, and all stages run in sequence.
|
|
Different [pipeline architectures](../pipelines/pipeline_architectures.md) allow you to change this behavior.
|
|
- The new [`rules` syntax](../yaml/index.md#rules) is the recommended method of
|
|
controlling when different jobs run. It is more powerful than the `only/except` syntax.
|
|
- One important difference is that jobs run independently of each other and have a
|
|
fresh environment in each job. Passing artifacts between jobs is controlled using the
|
|
[`artifacts`](../yaml/index.md#artifacts) and [`dependencies`](../yaml/index.md#dependencies)
|
|
keywords. When finished, use the planned [Workspaces](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/29265)
|
|
feature to persist a common workspace between serial jobs.
|
|
- The `.gitlab-ci.yml` file is checked in to the root of your repository, much like a Jenkinsfile, but
|
|
is in the YAML format (see [complete reference](../yaml/index.md)) instead of a Groovy DSL. It's most
|
|
analogous to the declarative Jenkinsfile format.
|
|
- Manual approvals or gates can be set up as [`when:manual` jobs](../jobs/job_control.md#create-a-job-that-must-be-run-manually). These can
|
|
also leverage [`protected environments`](../jobs/job_control.md#run-a-job-after-a-delay)
|
|
to control who is able to approve them.
|
|
- GitLab comes with a [container registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md), so you can use
|
|
container images to set up your build environment. For example, set up one pipeline that builds your build environment
|
|
itself and publish that to the container registry. Then, have your pipelines use this instead of each building their
|
|
own environment, which is slower and may be less consistent. We have extensive documentation on [how to use the Container Registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md).
|
|
- A central utilities repository can be a great place to put assorted scheduled jobs
|
|
or other manual jobs that function like utilities. Jenkins installations tend to
|
|
have a few of these.
|
|
|
|
## Agents vs. runners
|
|
|
|
Both Jenkins agents and GitLab runners are the hosts that run jobs. To convert the
|
|
Jenkins agent, uninstall it and then [install and register the runner](../runners/index.md).
|
|
Runners do not require much overhead, so you can size them similarly to the Jenkins
|
|
agents you were using.
|
|
|
|
Some important differences in the way runners work in comparison to agents are:
|
|
|
|
- Runners can be set up as [shared across an instance, be added at the group level, or set up at the project level](../runners/runners_scope.md).
|
|
They self-select jobs from the scopes you've defined automatically.
|
|
- You can also [use tags](../runners/configure_runners.md#use-tags-to-control-which-jobs-a-runner-can-run) for finer control, and
|
|
associate runners with specific jobs. For example, you can use a tag for jobs that
|
|
require dedicated, more powerful, or specific hardware.
|
|
- GitLab has [autoscaling for runners](https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/configuration/autoscale.html).
|
|
Use autoscaling to provision runners only when needed and scale down when not needed,
|
|
similar to ephemeral agents in Jenkins.
|
|
|
|
If you are using `gitlab.com`, you can take advantage of our [shared runner fleet](../runners/index.md)
|
|
to run jobs without provisioning your own runners. We are investigating making them
|
|
[available for self-managed instances](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/835)
|
|
as well.
|
|
|
|
## Groovy vs. YAML
|
|
|
|
Jenkins Pipelines are based on [Groovy](https://groovy-lang.org/), so the pipeline specification is written as code.
|
|
GitLab works a bit differently, using the more highly structured [YAML](https://yaml.org/) format.
|
|
The scripting elements are in `script` blocks separate from the pipeline specification itself.
|
|
|
|
Using YAML is a strength of GitLab, in that it helps keep the learning curve much simpler to get up and running.
|
|
It also avoids some of the problem of unconstrained complexity which can make your Jenkinsfile hard to understand
|
|
and manage.
|
|
|
|
We do of course still value DRY (don't repeat yourself) principles. We want to ensure that
|
|
behaviors of your jobs can be codified once and applied as needed. You can use the `extends` syntax to
|
|
[reuse configuration in your jobs](../yaml/index.md#extends), and `include` can
|
|
be used to [reuse pipeline configurations](../yaml/index.md#include) in pipelines
|
|
in different projects:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
.in-docker:
|
|
tags:
|
|
- docker
|
|
image: alpine
|
|
|
|
rspec:
|
|
extends:
|
|
- .in-docker
|
|
script:
|
|
- rake rspec
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Artifact publishing
|
|
|
|
Artifacts may work a bit differently than you've used them with Jenkins. In GitLab, any job can define
|
|
a set of artifacts to be saved by using the `artifacts` keyword. This can be configured to point to a file
|
|
or set of files that can then be persisted from job to job. Read more on our detailed
|
|
[artifacts documentation](../pipelines/job_artifacts.md):
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
pdf:
|
|
script: xelatex mycv.tex
|
|
artifacts:
|
|
paths:
|
|
- ./mycv.pdf
|
|
- ./output/
|
|
expire_in: 1 week
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Additionally, we have package management features like built-in container and package registries that you
|
|
can leverage. You can see the complete list of packaging features in the
|
|
[Packages and registries](../../user/packages/index.md) documentation.
|
|
|
|
## Integrated features
|
|
|
|
You may have used plugins to get things like code quality, unit tests, and security scanning working in Jenkins.
|
|
GitLab takes advantage of our connected ecosystem to automatically pull these kinds of results into
|
|
your merge requests, pipeline details pages, and other locations. You may find that you actually don't
|
|
need to configure anything to have these appear.
|
|
|
|
Our [CI/CD feature index](../index.md#features) has the full list of bundled features and links to the documentation for each.
|
|
Refer to this index if these features aren't working as expected, or if you'd like to see what's available.
|
|
|
|
### Templates
|
|
|
|
For advanced CI/CD teams, project templates can enable the reuse of pipeline configurations,
|
|
as well as encourage inner sourcing.
|
|
|
|
In self-managed GitLab instances, you can build an [Instance Template Repository](../../user/admin_area/settings/instance_template_repository.md).
|
|
Development teams across the whole organization can select templates from a dropdown list.
|
|
A group maintainer or a group owner is able to set a group to use as the source for the
|
|
[custom project templates](../../user/admin_area/custom_project_templates.md). This can
|
|
be used by all projects in the group. An instance administrator can set a group as
|
|
the source for [instance project templates](../../user/group/custom_project_templates.md),
|
|
which can be used by projects in that instance.
|
|
|
|
## Convert a declarative Jenkinsfile
|
|
|
|
A declarative Jenkinsfile contains "Sections" and "Directives" which are used to control the behavior of your
|
|
pipelines. Equivalents for all of these exist in GitLab, which we've documented below.
|
|
|
|
This section is based on the [Jenkinsfile syntax documentation](https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/syntax/)
|
|
and is meant to be a mapping of concepts there to concepts in GitLab.
|
|
|
|
### Sections
|
|
|
|
#### `agent`
|
|
|
|
The agent section is used to define how a pipeline executes. For GitLab, we use [runners](../runners/index.md)
|
|
to provide this capability. You can configure your own runners in Kubernetes or on any host. You can also take advantage
|
|
of our shared runner fleet (the shared runner fleet is only available for GitLab.com users).
|
|
We also support using [tags](../runners/configure_runners.md#use-tags-to-control-which-jobs-a-runner-can-run) to direct different jobs
|
|
to different runners (execution agents).
|
|
|
|
The `agent` section also allows you to define which Docker images should be used for execution, for which we use
|
|
the [`image`](../yaml/index.md#image) keyword. The `image` can be set on a single job or at the top level, in which
|
|
case it applies to all jobs in the pipeline:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
my_job:
|
|
image: alpine
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### `post`
|
|
|
|
The `post` section defines the actions that should be performed at the end of the pipeline. GitLab also supports
|
|
this through the use of stages. You can define your stages as follows, and any jobs assigned to the `before_pipeline`
|
|
or `after_pipeline` stages run as expected. You can call these stages anything you like:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
stages:
|
|
- before_pipeline
|
|
- build
|
|
- test
|
|
- deploy
|
|
- after_pipeline
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Setting a step to be performed before and after any job can be done via the
|
|
[`before_script`](../yaml/index.md#before_script) and [`after_script`](../yaml/index.md#after_script) keywords:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
default:
|
|
before_script:
|
|
- echo "I run before any jobs starts in the entire pipeline, and can be responsible for setting up the environment."
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### `stages`
|
|
|
|
GitLab CI/CD also lets you define stages, but is a little bit more free-form to configure. The GitLab [`stages` keyword](../yaml/index.md#stages)
|
|
is a top level setting that enumerates the list of stages. You are not required to nest individual jobs underneath
|
|
the `stages` section. Any job defined in the `.gitlab-ci.yml` can be made a part of any stage through use of the
|
|
[`stage` keyword](../yaml/index.md#stage).
|
|
|
|
Unless otherwise specified, every pipeline is instantiated with a `build`, `test`, and `deploy` stage
|
|
which are run in that order. Jobs that have no `stage` defined are placed by default in the `test` stage.
|
|
Of course, each job that refers to a stage must refer to a stage that exists in the pipeline configuration.
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
stages:
|
|
- build
|
|
- test
|
|
- deploy
|
|
|
|
my_job:
|
|
stage: build
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### `steps`
|
|
|
|
The `steps` section is equivalent to the [`script` section](../yaml/index.md#script) of an individual job. The `steps` section is a YAML array
|
|
with each line representing an individual command to be run:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
my_job:
|
|
script:
|
|
- echo "hello! the current time is:"
|
|
- time
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Directives
|
|
|
|
#### `environment`
|
|
|
|
In GitLab, we use the [`variables` keyword](../yaml/index.md#variables) to define different variables at runtime.
|
|
These can also be set up through the GitLab UI, under CI/CD settings. See also our [general documentation on variables](../variables/index.md),
|
|
including the section on [protected variables](../variables/index.md#protect-a-cicd-variable). This can be used
|
|
to limit access to certain variables to certain environments or runners:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
variables:
|
|
POSTGRES_USER: user
|
|
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: testing_password
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### `options`
|
|
|
|
Here, options for different things exist associated with the object in question itself. For example, options related
|
|
to jobs are defined in relation to the job itself. If you're looking for a certain option, you should be able to find
|
|
where it's located by searching our [complete configuration reference](../yaml/index.md) page.
|
|
|
|
#### `parameters`
|
|
|
|
GitLab does not require you to define which variables you want to be available when starting a manual job. A user
|
|
can provide any variables they like.
|
|
|
|
#### `triggers` / `cron`
|
|
|
|
Because GitLab is integrated tightly with Git, SCM polling options for triggers are not needed. We support a
|
|
[syntax for scheduling pipelines](../pipelines/schedules.md).
|
|
|
|
#### `tools`
|
|
|
|
GitLab does not support a separate `tools` directive. Our best-practice recommendation is to use pre-built
|
|
container images. These images can be cached and can be built to already contain the tools you need for your pipelines. Pipelines can
|
|
be set up to automatically build these images as needed and deploy them to the [container registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md).
|
|
|
|
If you don't use container images with Docker or Kubernetes, but use the `shell` executor on your own system,
|
|
you must set up your environment. You can set up the environment in advance, or as part of the jobs
|
|
with a `before_script` action that handles this for you.
|
|
|
|
#### `input`
|
|
|
|
Similar to the `parameters` keyword, this is not needed because a manual job can always be provided runtime
|
|
variable entry.
|
|
|
|
#### `when`
|
|
|
|
GitLab does support a [`when` keyword](../yaml/index.md#when) which is used to indicate when a job should be
|
|
run in case of (or despite) failure. Most of the logic for controlling pipelines can be found in
|
|
our very powerful [`rules` system](../yaml/index.md#rules):
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
my_job:
|
|
script:
|
|
- echo
|
|
rules:
|
|
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Additional resources
|
|
|
|
For help making your pipelines faster and more efficient, see the
|
|
[pipeline efficiency documentation](../pipelines/pipeline_efficiency.md).
|