738 lines
33 KiB
Markdown
738 lines
33 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: Protect
|
|
group: Container Security
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Security scanner integration
|
|
|
|
Integrating a security scanner into GitLab consists of providing end users
|
|
with a [CI job definition](../../ci/yaml/index.md)
|
|
they can add to their CI configuration files to scan their GitLab projects.
|
|
This CI job should then output its results in a GitLab-specified format. These results are then
|
|
automatically presented in various places in GitLab, such as the Pipeline view, merge request
|
|
widget, and Security Dashboard.
|
|
|
|
The scanning job is usually based on a [Docker image](https://docs.docker.com/)
|
|
that contains the scanner and all its dependencies in a self-contained environment.
|
|
|
|
This page documents requirements and guidelines for writing CI jobs that implement a security
|
|
scanner, as well as requirements and guidelines for the Docker image.
|
|
|
|
## Job definition
|
|
|
|
This section describes several important fields to add to the security scanner's job
|
|
definition file. Full documentation on these and other available fields can be viewed
|
|
in the [CI documentation](../../ci/yaml/index.md#image).
|
|
|
|
### Name
|
|
|
|
For consistency, scanning jobs should be named after the scanner, in lower case.
|
|
The job name is suffixed after the type of scanning:
|
|
|
|
- `_dependency_scanning`
|
|
- `_cluster_image_scanning`
|
|
- `_container_scanning`
|
|
- `_dast`
|
|
- `_sast`
|
|
|
|
For instance, the dependency scanning job based on the "MySec" scanner would be named `mysec_dependency_scanning`.
|
|
|
|
### Image
|
|
|
|
The [`image`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#image) keyword is used to specify
|
|
the [Docker image](../../ci/docker/using_docker_images.md#what-is-an-image)
|
|
containing the security scanner.
|
|
|
|
### Script
|
|
|
|
The [`script`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#script) keyword
|
|
is used to specify the commands to run the scanner.
|
|
Because the `script` entry can't be left empty, it must be set to the command that performs the scan.
|
|
It is not possible to rely on the predefined `ENTRYPOINT` and `CMD` of the Docker image
|
|
to perform the scan automatically, without passing any command.
|
|
|
|
The [`before_script`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#before_script)
|
|
should not be used in the job definition because users may rely on this to prepare their projects before performing the scan.
|
|
For instance, it is common practice to use `before_script` to install system libraries
|
|
a particular project needs before performing SAST or Dependency Scanning.
|
|
|
|
Similarly, [`after_script`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#after_script)
|
|
should not be used in the job definition, because it may be overridden by users.
|
|
|
|
### Stage
|
|
|
|
For consistency, scanning jobs should belong to the `test` stage when possible.
|
|
The [`stage`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#stage) keyword can be omitted because `test` is the default value.
|
|
|
|
### Fail-safe
|
|
|
|
To be aligned with the [GitLab Security paradigm](https://about.gitlab.com/direction/secure/#security-paradigm),
|
|
scanning jobs should not block the pipeline when they fail,
|
|
so the [`allow_failure`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#allow_failure) parameter should be set to `true`.
|
|
|
|
### Artifacts
|
|
|
|
Scanning jobs must declare a report that corresponds to the type of scanning they perform,
|
|
using the [`artifacts:reports`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#artifactsreports) keyword.
|
|
Valid reports are:
|
|
|
|
- `dependency_scanning`
|
|
- `container_scanning`
|
|
- `cluster_image_scanning`
|
|
- `dast`
|
|
- `api_fuzzing`
|
|
- `coverage_fuzzing`
|
|
- `sast`
|
|
|
|
For example, here is the definition of a SAST job that generates a file named `gl-sast-report.json`,
|
|
and uploads it as a SAST report:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
mysec_sast:
|
|
image: registry.gitlab.com/secure/mysec
|
|
artifacts:
|
|
reports:
|
|
sast: gl-sast-report.json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Note that `gl-sast-report.json` is an example file path but any other filename can be used. See
|
|
[the Output file section](#output-file) for more details. It's processed as a SAST report because
|
|
it's declared under the `reports:sast` key in the job definition, not because of the filename.
|
|
|
|
### Policies
|
|
|
|
Certain GitLab workflows, such as [AutoDevOps](../../topics/autodevops/customize.md#disable-jobs),
|
|
define CI/CD variables to indicate that given scans should be disabled. You can check for this by looking
|
|
for variables such as:
|
|
|
|
- `DEPENDENCY_SCANNING_DISABLED`
|
|
- `CONTAINER_SCANNING_DISABLED`
|
|
- `CLUSTER_IMAGE_SCANNING_DISABLED`
|
|
- `SAST_DISABLED`
|
|
- `DAST_DISABLED`
|
|
|
|
If appropriate based on the scanner type, you should then disable running the custom scanner.
|
|
|
|
GitLab also defines a `CI_PROJECT_REPOSITORY_LANGUAGES` variable, which provides the list of
|
|
languages in the repository. Depending on this value, your scanner may or may not do something different.
|
|
Language detection currently relies on the [`linguist`](https://github.com/github/linguist) Ruby gem.
|
|
See the [predefined CI/CD variables](../../ci/variables/predefined_variables.md).
|
|
|
|
#### Policy checking example
|
|
|
|
This example shows how to skip a custom Dependency Scanning job, `mysec_dependency_scanning`, unless
|
|
the project repository contains Java source code and the `dependency_scanning` feature is enabled:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
mysec_dependency_scanning:
|
|
rules:
|
|
- if: $DEPENDENCY_SCANNING_DISABLED
|
|
when: never
|
|
- if: $GITLAB_FEATURES =~ /\bdependency_scanning\b/
|
|
exists:
|
|
- '**/*.java'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Any additional job policy should only be configured by users based on their needs.
|
|
For instance, predefined policies should not trigger the scanning job
|
|
for a particular branch or when a particular set of files changes.
|
|
|
|
## Docker image
|
|
|
|
The Docker image is a self-contained environment that combines
|
|
the scanner with all the libraries and tools it depends on.
|
|
Packaging your scanner into a Docker image makes its dependencies and configuration always present,
|
|
regardless of the individual machine the scanner runs on.
|
|
|
|
### Image size
|
|
|
|
Depending on the CI infrastructure,
|
|
the CI may have to fetch the Docker image every time the job runs.
|
|
For the scanning job to run fast and avoid wasting bandwidth, Docker images should be as small as
|
|
possible. You should aim for 50MB or smaller. If that isn't possible, try to keep it below 1.46 GB,
|
|
which is the size of a CD-ROM.
|
|
|
|
If the scanner requires a fully functional Linux environment,
|
|
it is recommended to use a [Debian](https://www.debian.org/intro/about) "slim" distribution or [Alpine Linux](https://www.alpinelinux.org/).
|
|
If possible, it is recommended to build the image from scratch, using the `FROM scratch` instruction,
|
|
and to compile the scanner with all the libraries it needs.
|
|
[Multi-stage builds](https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/multistage-build/)
|
|
might also help with keeping the image small.
|
|
|
|
To keep an image size small, consider using [dive](https://github.com/wagoodman/dive#dive) to analyze layers in a Docker image to
|
|
identify where additional bloat might be originating from.
|
|
|
|
In some cases, it might be difficult to remove files from an image. When this occurs, consider using
|
|
[Zstandard](https://github.com/facebook/zstd)
|
|
to compress files or large directories. Zstandard offers many different compression levels that can
|
|
decrease the size of your image with very little impact to decompression speed. It may be helpful to
|
|
automatically decompress any compressed directories as soon as an image launches. You can accomplish
|
|
this by adding a step to the Docker image's `/etc/bashrc` or to a specific user's `$HOME/.bashrc`.
|
|
Remember to change the entry point to launch a bash login shell if you chose the latter option.
|
|
|
|
Here are some examples to get you started:
|
|
|
|
- <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/license-management/-/blob/0b976fcffe0a9b8e80587adb076bcdf279c9331c/config/install.sh#L168-170>
|
|
- <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/license-management/-/blob/0b976fcffe0a9b8e80587adb076bcdf279c9331c/config/.bashrc#L49>
|
|
|
|
### Image tag
|
|
|
|
As documented in the [Docker Official Images](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images#tags-and-aliases) project,
|
|
it is strongly encouraged that version number tags be given aliases which allows the user to easily refer to the "most recent" release of a particular series.
|
|
See also [Docker Tagging: Best practices for tagging and versioning Docker images](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/stevelasker/docker-tagging-best-practices-for-tagging-and-versioning-docker-images).
|
|
|
|
## Command line
|
|
|
|
A scanner is a command line tool that takes environment variables as inputs,
|
|
and generates a file that is uploaded as a report (based on the job definition).
|
|
It also generates text output on the standard output and standard error streams, and exits with a status code.
|
|
|
|
### Variables
|
|
|
|
All CI/CD variables are passed to the scanner as environment variables.
|
|
The scanned project is described by the [predefined CI/CD variables](../../ci/variables/index.md).
|
|
|
|
#### SAST and Dependency Scanning
|
|
|
|
SAST and Dependency Scanning scanners must scan the files in the project directory, given by the `CI_PROJECT_DIR` CI/CD variable.
|
|
|
|
#### Container Scanning
|
|
|
|
In order to be consistent with the official Container Scanning for GitLab,
|
|
scanners must scan the Docker image whose name and tag are given by
|
|
`CI_APPLICATION_REPOSITORY` and `CI_APPLICATION_TAG`, respectively. If the `DOCKER_IMAGE`
|
|
CI/CD variable is provided, then the `CI_APPLICATION_REPOSITORY` and `CI_APPLICATION_TAG` variables
|
|
are ignored, and the image specified in the `DOCKER_IMAGE` variable is scanned instead.
|
|
|
|
If not provided, `CI_APPLICATION_REPOSITORY` should default to
|
|
`$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE/$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG`, which is a combination of predefined CI/CD variables.
|
|
`CI_APPLICATION_TAG` should default to `CI_COMMIT_SHA`.
|
|
|
|
The scanner should sign in the Docker registry
|
|
using the variables `DOCKER_USER` and `DOCKER_PASSWORD`.
|
|
If these are not defined, then the scanner should use
|
|
`CI_REGISTRY_USER` and `CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD` as default values.
|
|
|
|
#### Cluster Image Scanning
|
|
|
|
To be consistent with the official `cluster_image_scanning` for GitLab, scanners must scan the
|
|
Kubernetes cluster whose configuration is given by `KUBECONFIG`.
|
|
|
|
If you use the `CIS_KUBECONFIG` CI/CD variable, then the
|
|
`KUBECONFIG` variable is ignored and the cluster specified in the
|
|
`CIS_KUBECONFIG` variable is scanned instead. If you don't provide
|
|
the `CIS_KUBECONFIG` CI/CD variable, the value defaults to the value of
|
|
`$KUBECONFIG`. `$KUBECONFIG` is a predefined CI/CD variable configured when the project is assigned to a
|
|
Kubernetes cluster. When multiple contexts are provided in the `KUBECONFIG` variable, the context
|
|
selected as `current-context` will be used to fetch vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
#### Configuration files
|
|
|
|
While scanners may use `CI_PROJECT_DIR` to load specific configuration files,
|
|
it is recommended to expose configuration as CI/CD variables, not files.
|
|
|
|
### Output file
|
|
|
|
Like any artifact uploaded to GitLab CI/CD,
|
|
the Secure report generated by the scanner must be written in the project directory,
|
|
given by the `CI_PROJECT_DIR` CI/CD variable.
|
|
|
|
It is recommended to name the output file after the type of scanning, and to use `gl-` as a prefix.
|
|
Since all Secure reports are JSON files, it is recommended to use `.json` as a file extension.
|
|
For instance, a suggested filename for a Dependency Scanning report is `gl-dependency-scanning.json`.
|
|
|
|
The [`artifacts:reports`](../../ci/yaml/index.md#artifactsreports) keyword
|
|
of the job definition must be consistent with the file path where the Security report is written.
|
|
For instance, if a Dependency Scanning analyzer writes its report to the CI project directory,
|
|
and if this report filename is `depscan.json`,
|
|
then `artifacts:reports:dependency_scanning` must be set to `depscan.json`.
|
|
|
|
### Exit code
|
|
|
|
Following the POSIX exit code standard, the scanner exits with 0 for success and any number from 1 to 255 for anything else.
|
|
Success also includes the case when vulnerabilities are found.
|
|
|
|
When executing a scanning job using the [Docker-in-Docker privileged mode](../../user/application_security/sast/index.md#requirements),
|
|
we reserve the following standard exit codes.
|
|
|
|
| Orchestrator Exit Code | Description |
|
|
|------------------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
| 3 | No match, no compatible analyzer |
|
|
| 4 | Project directory empty |
|
|
| 5 | No compatible Docker image |
|
|
|
|
### Logging
|
|
|
|
The scanner should log error messages and warnings so that users can easily investigate
|
|
misconfiguration and integration issues by looking at the log of the CI scanning job.
|
|
|
|
Scanners may use [ANSI escape codes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#Colors)
|
|
to colorize the messages they write to the Unix standard output and standard error streams.
|
|
We recommend using red to report errors, yellow for warnings, and green for notices.
|
|
Also, we recommend prefixing error messages with `[ERRO]`, warnings with `[WARN]`, and notices with `[INFO]`.
|
|
|
|
#### Logging level
|
|
|
|
The scanner should filter out a log message if its log level is lower than the
|
|
one set in the `SECURE_LOG_LEVEL` CI/CD variable. For instance, `info` and `warn`
|
|
messages should be skipped when `SECURE_LOG_LEVEL` is set to `error`. Accepted
|
|
values are as follows, listed from highest to lowest:
|
|
|
|
- `fatal`
|
|
- `error`
|
|
- `warn`
|
|
- `info`
|
|
- `debug`
|
|
|
|
It is recommended to use the `debug` level for verbose logging that could be
|
|
useful when debugging. The default value for `SECURE_LOG_LEVEL` should be set
|
|
to `info`.
|
|
|
|
When executing command lines, scanners should use the `debug` level to log the command line and its output.
|
|
If the command line fails, then it should be logged with the `error` log level;
|
|
this makes it possible to debug the problem without having to change the log level to `debug` and rerun the scanning job.
|
|
|
|
#### common `logutil` package
|
|
|
|
If you are using [go](https://go.dev/) and
|
|
[common](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common),
|
|
then it is suggested that you use [Logrus](https://github.com/Sirupsen/logrus)
|
|
and [common's `logutil` package](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common/-/tree/master/logutil)
|
|
to configure the formatter for [Logrus](https://github.com/Sirupsen/logrus).
|
|
See the [`logutil` README](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common/-/tree/master/logutil/README.md)
|
|
|
|
## Report
|
|
|
|
The report is a JSON document that combines vulnerabilities with possible remediations.
|
|
|
|
This documentation gives an overview of the report JSON format,
|
|
as well as recommendations and examples to help integrators set its fields.
|
|
The format is extensively described in the documentation of
|
|
[SAST](../../user/application_security/sast/index.md#reports-json-format),
|
|
[DAST](../../user/application_security/dast/#reports),
|
|
[Dependency Scanning](../../user/application_security/dependency_scanning/index.md#reports-json-format),
|
|
[Container Scanning](../../user/application_security/container_scanning/index.md#reports-json-format),
|
|
and [Cluster Image Scanning](../../user/application_security/cluster_image_scanning/index.md#reports-json-format).
|
|
|
|
You can find the schemas for these scanners here:
|
|
|
|
- [SAST](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/sast-report-format.json)
|
|
- [DAST](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/dast-report-format.json)
|
|
- [Dependency Scanning](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/dependency-scanning-report-format.json)
|
|
- [Container Scanning](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/container-scanning-report-format.json)
|
|
- [Coverage Fuzzing](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/coverage-fuzzing-report-format.json)
|
|
- [Secret Detection](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/blob/master/dist/secret-detection-report-format.json)
|
|
|
|
### Retention period for vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
GitLab has the following retention policies for vulnerabilities on non-default branches. Vulnerabilities are no longer available:
|
|
|
|
- When the related CI job artifact expires.
|
|
- 90 days after the pipeline is created, even if the related CI job artifacts are locked.
|
|
|
|
To view vulnerabilities, either:
|
|
|
|
- Re-run the pipeline.
|
|
- Download the related CI job artifacts if they are available.
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
|
|
This does not apply for the vulnerabilities existing on the default branch.
|
|
|
|
### Enable report validation
|
|
|
|
> [Deprecated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/354928) in GitLab 14.9, and planned for removal in GitLab 15.0.
|
|
DISCLAIMER:
|
|
This page contains information related to upcoming products, features, and functionality.
|
|
It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only.
|
|
Please do not rely on this information for purchasing or planning purposes.
|
|
As with all projects, the items mentioned on this page are subject to change or delay.
|
|
The development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the
|
|
sole discretion of GitLab Inc.
|
|
In GitLab 15.0 and later, report validation is enabled and enforced. Reports that fail validation
|
|
are not ingested, and an error message displays on the corresponding pipeline.
|
|
|
|
In GitLab 14.10 and later, report validation against the schemas is enabled but not enforced.
|
|
Reports that fail validation are ingested but display a warning in the pipeline security tab.
|
|
|
|
To enforce report validation for GitLab version 14.10 and earlier, set
|
|
[`VALIDATE_SCHEMA`](../../user/application_security/#enable-security-report-validation) to `"true"`.
|
|
|
|
### Report validation
|
|
|
|
You must ensure that reports generated by the scanner pass validation against the schema version
|
|
declared in your reports. Reports that don't pass validation are not ingested by GitLab, and an
|
|
error message displays on the corresponding pipeline.
|
|
|
|
Reports that use a deprecated version of the secure report schema are ingested but cause a warning
|
|
message to display on the corresponding pipeline. If you see this warning, update your
|
|
analyzer to use the latest available schemas.
|
|
|
|
After the deprecation period for a schema version, the file is removed from GitLab. Reports that
|
|
declare removed versions are rejected, and an error message displays on the corresponding pipeline.
|
|
|
|
GitLab uses the
|
|
[`json_schemer`](https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/json_schemer) gem to perform validation.
|
|
|
|
Ongoing improvements to report validation are tracked [in this epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/6968).
|
|
In the meantime, you can see which versions are supported in the
|
|
[source code](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/08dd756429731a0cca1e27ca9d59eea226398a7d/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/security/validators/schema_validator.rb#L9-27).
|
|
|
|
### Report Fields
|
|
|
|
#### Version
|
|
|
|
This field specifies which [Security Report Schemas](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas) version you are using. For information about the versions to use, see [releases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas/-/releases).
|
|
|
|
In GitLab 14.10 and later, GitLab validates your report against the version of the schema specified by this value.
|
|
The versions supported by GitLab can be found in
|
|
[`gitlab/ee/lib/ee/gitlab/ci/parsers/security/validators/schemas`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/ee/lib/ee/gitlab/ci/parsers/security/validators/schemas).
|
|
|
|
#### Vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
The `vulnerabilities` field of the report is an array of vulnerability objects.
|
|
|
|
##### ID
|
|
|
|
The `id` field is the unique identifier of the vulnerability.
|
|
It is used to reference a fixed vulnerability from a [remediation objects](#remediations).
|
|
We recommend that you generate a UUID and use it as the `id` field's value.
|
|
|
|
##### Category
|
|
|
|
The value of the `category` field matches the report type:
|
|
|
|
- `dependency_scanning`
|
|
- `cluster_image_scanning`
|
|
- `container_scanning`
|
|
- `sast`
|
|
- `dast`
|
|
|
|
##### Scanner
|
|
|
|
The `scanner` field is an object that embeds a human-readable `name` and a technical `id`.
|
|
The `id` should not collide with any other scanner another integrator would provide.
|
|
|
|
##### Name, message, and description
|
|
|
|
The `name` and `message` fields contain a short description of the vulnerability.
|
|
The `description` field provides more details.
|
|
|
|
The `name` field is context-free and contains no information on where the vulnerability has been found,
|
|
whereas the `message` may repeat the location.
|
|
|
|
As a visual example, this screenshot highlights where these fields are used when viewing a
|
|
vulnerability as part of a pipeline view.
|
|
|
|
![Example Vulnerability](img/example_vuln.png)
|
|
|
|
For instance, a `message` for a vulnerability
|
|
reported by Dependency Scanning gives information on the vulnerable dependency,
|
|
which is redundant with the `location` field of the vulnerability.
|
|
The `name` field is preferred but the `message` field is used
|
|
when the context/location cannot be removed from the title of the vulnerability.
|
|
|
|
To illustrate, here is an example vulnerability object reported by a Dependency Scanning scanner,
|
|
and where the `message` repeats the `location` field:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"location": {
|
|
"dependency": {
|
|
"package": {
|
|
"name": "debug"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"name": "Regular Expression Denial of Service",
|
|
"message": "Regular Expression Denial of Service in debug",
|
|
"description": "The debug module is vulnerable to regular expression denial of service
|
|
when untrusted user input is passed into the `o` formatter.
|
|
It takes around 50k characters to block for 2 seconds making this a low severity issue."
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The `description` might explain how the vulnerability works or give context about the exploit.
|
|
It should not repeat the other fields of the vulnerability object.
|
|
In particular, the `description` should not repeat the `location` (what is affected)
|
|
or the `solution` (how to mitigate the risk).
|
|
|
|
##### Solution
|
|
|
|
You can use the `solution` field to instruct users how to fix the identified vulnerability or to mitigate
|
|
the risk. End-users interact with this field, whereas GitLab automatically processes the
|
|
`remediations` objects.
|
|
|
|
##### Identifiers
|
|
|
|
The `identifiers` array describes the detected vulnerability. An identifier object's `type` and
|
|
`value` fields are used to tell if two identifiers are the same. The user interface uses the
|
|
object's `name` and `url` fields to display the identifier.
|
|
|
|
It is recommended to reuse the identifiers the GitLab scanners already define:
|
|
|
|
| Identifier | Type | Example value |
|
|
|------------|------|---------------|
|
|
| [CVE](https://cve.mitre.org/cve/) | `cve` | CVE-2019-10086 |
|
|
| [CWE](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/index.html) | `cwe` | CWE-1026 |
|
|
| [OSVD](https://cve.mitre.org/data/refs/refmap/source-OSVDB.html) | `osvdb` | OSVDB-113928 |
|
|
| [USN](https://ubuntu.com/security/notices) | `usn` | USN-4234-1 |
|
|
| [WASC](http://projects.webappsec.org/Threat-Classification-Reference-Grid) | `wasc` | WASC-19 |
|
|
| [RHSA](https://access.redhat.com/errata/#/) | `rhsa` | RHSA-2020:0111 |
|
|
| [ELSA](https://linux.oracle.com/security/) | `elsa` | ELSA-2020-0085 |
|
|
|
|
The generic identifiers listed above are defined in the [common library](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common),
|
|
which is shared by some of the analyzers that GitLab maintains. You can [contribute](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common/blob/master/issue/identifier.go)
|
|
new generic identifiers to if needed. Analyzers may also produce vendor-specific or product-specific
|
|
identifiers, which don't belong in the [common library](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/common).
|
|
|
|
The first item of the `identifiers` array is called the [primary
|
|
identifier](../../user/application_security/terminology/#primary-identifier).
|
|
The primary identifier is particularly important, because it is used to
|
|
[track vulnerabilities](#tracking-and-merging-vulnerabilities) as new commits are pushed to the repository.
|
|
Identifiers are also used to [merge duplicate vulnerabilities](#tracking-and-merging-vulnerabilities)
|
|
reported for the same commit, except for `CWE` and `WASC`.
|
|
|
|
Not all vulnerabilities have CVEs, and a CVE can be identified multiple times. As a result, a CVE
|
|
isn't a stable identifier and you shouldn't assume it as such when tracking vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
The maximum number of identifiers for a vulnerability is set as 20. If a vulnerability has more than 20 identifiers,
|
|
the system saves only the first 20 of them. Note that vulnerabilities in the [Pipeline Security](../../user/application_security/security_dashboard/#view-vulnerabilities-in-a-pipeline)
|
|
tab do not enforce this limit and all identifiers present in the report artifact are displayed.
|
|
|
|
#### Details
|
|
|
|
The `details` field is an object that supports many different content elements that are displayed when viewing vulnerability information. An example of the various data elements can be seen in the [security-reports repository](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-examples/security/security-reports/-/tree/master/samples/details-example).
|
|
|
|
#### Location
|
|
|
|
The `location` indicates where the vulnerability has been detected.
|
|
The format of the location depends on the type of scanning.
|
|
|
|
Internally GitLab extracts some attributes of the `location` to generate the **location fingerprint**,
|
|
which is used to track vulnerabilities
|
|
as new commits are pushed to the repository.
|
|
The attributes used to generate the location fingerprint also depend on the type of scanning.
|
|
|
|
##### Dependency Scanning
|
|
|
|
The `location` of a Dependency Scanning vulnerability is composed of a `dependency` and a `file`.
|
|
The `dependency` object describes the affected `package` and the dependency `version`.
|
|
`package` embeds the `name` of the affected library/module.
|
|
`file` is the path of the dependency file that declares the affected dependency.
|
|
|
|
For instance, here is the `location` object for a vulnerability affecting
|
|
version `4.0.11` of npm package [`handlebars`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/handlebars):
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"file": "client/package.json",
|
|
"dependency": {
|
|
"package": {
|
|
"name": "handlebars"
|
|
},
|
|
"version": "4.0.11"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This affected dependency is listed in `client/package.json`,
|
|
a dependency file processed by npm or yarn.
|
|
|
|
The location fingerprint of a Dependency Scanning vulnerability
|
|
combines the `file` and the package `name`,
|
|
so these attributes are mandatory.
|
|
All other attributes are optional.
|
|
|
|
##### Container Scanning
|
|
|
|
Similar to Dependency Scanning,
|
|
the `location` of a Container Scanning vulnerability has a `dependency` and a `file`.
|
|
It also has an `operating_system` field.
|
|
|
|
For instance, here is the `location` object for a vulnerability affecting
|
|
version `2.50.3-2+deb9u1` of Debian package `glib2.0`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"dependency": {
|
|
"package": {
|
|
"name": "glib2.0"
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"version": "2.50.3-2+deb9u1",
|
|
"operating_system": "debian:9",
|
|
"image": "registry.gitlab.com/example/app:latest"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The affected package is found when scanning the Docker image `registry.gitlab.com/example/app:latest`.
|
|
The Docker image is based on `debian:9` (Debian Stretch).
|
|
|
|
The location fingerprint of a Container Scanning vulnerability
|
|
combines the `operating_system` and the package `name`,
|
|
so these attributes are mandatory.
|
|
The `image` is also mandatory.
|
|
All other attributes are optional.
|
|
|
|
##### Cluster Image Scanning
|
|
|
|
The `location` of a `cluster_image_scanning` vulnerability has a `dependency` field. It also has
|
|
an `operating_system` field. For example, here is the `location` object for a vulnerability
|
|
affecting version `2.50.3-2+deb9u1` of Debian package `glib2.0`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"dependency": {
|
|
"package": {
|
|
"name": "glib2.0"
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"version": "2.50.3-2+deb9u1",
|
|
"operating_system": "debian:9",
|
|
"image": "index.docker.io/library/nginx:1.18",
|
|
"kubernetes_resource": {
|
|
"namespace": "production",
|
|
"kind": "Deployment",
|
|
"name": "nginx-ingress",
|
|
"container_name": "nginx",
|
|
"agent_id": "1"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The affected package is found when scanning a deployment using the `index.docker.io/library/nginx:1.18` image.
|
|
|
|
The location fingerprint of a Cluster Image Scanning vulnerability combines the
|
|
`namespace`, `kind`, `name`, and `container_name` fields from the `kubernetes_resource`,
|
|
as well as the package `name`, so these fields are required. The `image` field is also mandatory.
|
|
The `cluster_id` and `agent_id` are mutually exclusive, and one of them must be present.
|
|
All other fields are optional.
|
|
|
|
##### SAST
|
|
|
|
The `location` of a SAST vulnerability must have a `file` and a `start_line` field,
|
|
giving the path of the affected file, and the affected line number, respectively.
|
|
It may also have an `end_line`, a `class`, and a `method`.
|
|
|
|
For instance, here is the `location` object for a security flaw found
|
|
at line `41` of `src/main/java/com/gitlab/example/App.java`,
|
|
in the `generateSecretToken` method of the `com.gitlab.security_products.tests.App` Java class:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"file": "src/main/java/com/gitlab/example/App.java",
|
|
"start_line": 41,
|
|
"end_line": 41,
|
|
"class": "com.gitlab.security_products.tests.App",
|
|
"method": "generateSecretToken1"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The location fingerprint of a SAST vulnerability
|
|
combines `file`, `start_line`, and `end_line`,
|
|
so these attributes are mandatory.
|
|
All other attributes are optional.
|
|
|
|
#### Tracking and merging vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
Users may give feedback on a vulnerability:
|
|
|
|
- They may dismiss a vulnerability if it doesn't apply to their projects
|
|
- They may create an issue for a vulnerability if there's a possible threat
|
|
|
|
GitLab tracks vulnerabilities so that user feedback is not lost
|
|
when new Git commits are pushed to the repository.
|
|
Vulnerabilities are tracked using a combination of three attributes:
|
|
|
|
- [Report type](#category)
|
|
- [Location fingerprint](#location)
|
|
- [Primary identifier](#identifiers)
|
|
|
|
Right now, GitLab cannot track a vulnerability if its location changes
|
|
as new Git commits are pushed, and this results in user feedback being lost.
|
|
For instance, user feedback on a SAST vulnerability is lost
|
|
if the affected file is renamed or the affected line moves down.
|
|
This is addressed in [issue #7586](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/7586).
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the multiple scans executed in the same CI pipeline result in duplicates
|
|
that are automatically merged using the vulnerability location and identifiers.
|
|
Two vulnerabilities are considered to be the same if they share the same [location fingerprint](#location)
|
|
and at least one [identifier](#identifiers). Two identifiers are the same if they share the same `type` and `id`.
|
|
CWE and WASC identifiers are not considered because they describe categories of vulnerability flaws,
|
|
but not specific security flaws.
|
|
|
|
##### Severity and confidence
|
|
|
|
The `severity` field describes how much the vulnerability impacts the software,
|
|
whereas the `confidence` field describes how reliable the assessment of the vulnerability is.
|
|
The severity is used to sort the vulnerabilities in the security dashboard.
|
|
|
|
The severity ranges from `Info` to `Critical`, but it can also be `Unknown`.
|
|
Valid values are: `Unknown`, `Info`, `Low`, `Medium`, `High`, or `Critical`
|
|
|
|
The confidence ranges from `Low` to `Confirmed`, but it can also be `Unknown`,
|
|
`Experimental` or even `Ignore` if the vulnerability is to be ignored.
|
|
Valid values are: `Ignore`, `Unknown`, `Experimental`, `Low`, `Medium`, `High`, or `Confirmed`
|
|
|
|
`Unknown` values means that data is unavailable to determine it's actual value. Therefore, it may be `high`, `medium`, or `low`,
|
|
and needs to be investigated. We have [provided a chart](../../user/application_security/sast/analyzers.md#data-provided-by-analyzers)
|
|
of the available SAST Analyzers and what data is currently available.
|
|
|
|
#### Remediations
|
|
|
|
The `remediations` field of the report is an array of remediation objects.
|
|
Each remediation describes a patch that can be applied to
|
|
[resolve](../../user/application_security/vulnerabilities/index.md#resolve-a-vulnerability)
|
|
a set of vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of a report that contains remediations.
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"vulnerabilities": [
|
|
{
|
|
"category": "dependency_scanning",
|
|
"name": "Regular Expression Denial of Service",
|
|
"id": "123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426655440000",
|
|
"solution": "Upgrade to new versions.",
|
|
"scanner": {
|
|
"id": "gemnasium",
|
|
"name": "Gemnasium"
|
|
},
|
|
"identifiers": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "gemnasium",
|
|
"name": "Gemnasium-642735a5-1425-428d-8d4e-3c854885a3c9",
|
|
"value": "642735a5-1425-428d-8d4e-3c854885a3c9"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"remediations": [
|
|
{
|
|
"fixes": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426655440000"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"summary": "Upgrade to new version",
|
|
"diff": "ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3lhcm4ubG9jayBiL3lhcm4ubG9jawppbmRleCAwZWNjOTJmLi43ZmE0NTU0IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS95Y=="
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
##### Summary
|
|
|
|
The `summary` field is an overview of how the vulnerabilities can be fixed. This field is required.
|
|
|
|
##### Fixed vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
The `fixes` field is an array of objects that reference the vulnerabilities fixed by the
|
|
remediation. `fixes[].id` contains a fixed vulnerability's [unique identifier](#id). This field is required.
|
|
|
|
##### Diff
|
|
|
|
The `diff` field is a base64-encoded remediation code diff, compatible with
|
|
[`git apply`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_discussion). This field is required.
|