14 KiB
stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
none | unassigned | To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
Vue
To get started with Vue, read through their documentation.
Examples
What is described in the following sections can be found in these examples:
Vue architecture
All new features built with Vue.js must follow a Flux architecture. The main goal we are trying to achieve is to have only one data flow and only one data entry. In order to achieve this goal we use vuex.
You can also read about this architecture in Vue docs about state management and about one way data flow.
Components and Store
In some features implemented with Vue.js, like the issue board or environments table you can find a clear separation of concerns:
new_feature
├── components
│ └── component.vue
│ └── ...
├── store
│ └── new_feature_store.js
├── index.js
For consistency purposes, we recommend you to follow the same structure.
Let's look into each of them:
An index.js
file
This is the index file of your new feature. This is where the root Vue instance of the new feature should be.
The Store and the Service should be imported and initialized in this file and provided as a prop to the main component.
Be sure to read about page-specific JavaScript.
Bootstrapping Gotchas
Providing data from HAML to JavaScript
While mounting a Vue application, you might need to provide data from Rails to JavaScript.
To do that, you can use the data
attributes in the HTML element and query them while mounting the application.
You should only do this while initializing the application, because the mounted element is replaced with a Vue-generated DOM.
The advantage of providing data from the DOM to the Vue instance through props
in the render
function
instead of querying the DOM inside the main Vue component is avoiding the need to create a fixture or an HTML element in the unit test,
which makes the tests easier.
See the following example, also, please refer to our Vue style guide for additional information on why we explicitly declare the data being passed into the Vue app;
// haml
#js-vue-app{ data: { endpoint: 'foo' }}
// index.js
const el = document.getElementById('js-vue-app');
if (!el) return false;
const { endpoint } = el.dataset;
return new Vue({
el,
render(createElement) {
return createElement('my-component', {
props: {
endpoint
},
});
},
});
When adding an
id
attribute to mount a Vue application, please make sure thisid
is unique across the codebase
Accessing the gl
object
When we need to query the gl
object for data that doesn't change during the application's life cycle, we should do it in the same place where we query the DOM.
By following this practice, we can avoid the need to mock the gl
object, which makes tests easier.
It should be done while initializing our Vue instance, and the data should be provided as props
to the main component:
return new Vue({
el: '.js-vue-app',
render(createElement) {
return createElement('my-component', {
props: {
username: gon.current_username,
},
});
},
});
Accessing feature flags
Use Vue's provide/inject mechanism
to make feature flags available to any descendant components in a Vue
application. The glFeatures
object is already provided in commons/vue.js
, so
only the mixin is required to use the flags:
// An arbitrary descendant component
import glFeatureFlagsMixin from '~/vue_shared/mixins/gl_feature_flags_mixin';
export default {
// ...
mixins: [glFeatureFlagsMixin()],
// ...
created() {
if (this.glFeatures.myFlag) {
// ...
}
},
}
This approach has a few benefits:
-
Arbitrarily deeply nested components can opt-in and access the flag without intermediate components being aware of it (c.f. passing the flag down via props).
-
Good testability, since the flag can be provided to
mount
/shallowMount
fromvue-test-utils
simply as a prop.import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils'; shallowMount(component, { provide: { glFeatures: { myFlag: true }, }, });
-
No need to access a global variable, except in the application's entry point.
A folder for Components
This folder holds all components that are specific to this new feature.
If you need to use or create a component that is likely to be used somewhere
else, please refer to vue_shared/components
.
A good rule of thumb to know when you should create a component is to think if it could be reusable elsewhere.
For example, tables are used in a quite amount of places across GitLab, a table would be a good fit for a component. On the other hand, a table cell used only in one table would not be a good use of this pattern.
You can read more about components in Vue.js site, Component System.
A folder for the Store
Vuex
Check this page for more details.
Mixing Vue and jQuery
- Mixing Vue and jQuery is not recommended.
- If you need to use a specific jQuery plugin in Vue, create a wrapper around it.
- It is acceptable for Vue to listen to existing jQuery events using jQuery event listeners.
- It is not recommended to add new jQuery events for Vue to interact with jQuery.
Mixing Vue and JavaScript classes (in the data function)
In the Vue documentation the Data function/object is defined as follows:
The data object for the Vue instance. Vue recursively converts its properties into getter/setters to make it “reactive”. The object must be plain: native objects such as browser API objects and prototype properties are ignored. A rule of thumb is that data should just be data - it is not recommended to observe objects with their own stateful behavior.
Based on the Vue guidance:
- Do not use or create a JavaScript class in your data function, such as
user: new User()
. - Do not add new JavaScript class implementations.
- Do use GraphQL, Vuex or a set of components if cannot use simple primitives or objects.
- Do maintain existing implementations using such approaches.
- Do Migrate components to a pure object model when there are substantial changes to it.
- Do add business logic to helpers or utils, so you can test them separately from your component.
Why
There are additional reasons why having a JavaScript class presents maintainability issues on a huge codebase:
- Once a class is created, it is easy to extend it in a way that can infringe Vue reactivity and best practices.
- A class adds a layer of abstraction, which makes the component API and its inner workings less clear.
- It makes it harder to test. Since the class is instantiated by the component data function, it is harder to 'manage' component and class separately.
- Adding OOP to a functional codebase adds yet another way of writing code, reducing consistency and clarity.
Style guide
Please refer to the Vue section of our style guide for best practices while writing and testing your Vue components and templates.
Testing Vue Components
Please refer to the Vue testing style guide for guidelines and best practices for testing your Vue components.
Each Vue component has a unique output. This output is always present in the render function.
Although we can test each method of a Vue component individually, our goal must be to test the output of the render/template function, which represents the state at all times.
Here's an example of a well structured unit test for this Vue component:
import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
import { GlLoadingIcon } from '@gitlab/ui';
import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
import App from '~/todos/app.vue';
const TEST_TODOS = [
{ text: 'Lorem ipsum test text' },
{ text: 'Lorem ipsum 2' },
];
const TEST_NEW_TODO = 'New todo title';
const TEST_TODO_PATH = '/todos';
describe('~/todos/app.vue', () => {
let wrapper;
let mock;
beforeEach(() => {
// IMPORTANT: Use axios-mock-adapter for stubbing axios API requests
mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
mock.onGet(TEST_TODO_PATH).reply(200, TEST_TODOS);
mock.onPost(TEST_TODO_PATH).reply(200);
});
afterEach(() => {
// IMPORTANT: Clean up the component instance and axios mock adapter
wrapper.destroy();
wrapper = null;
mock.restore();
});
// It is very helpful to separate setting up the component from
// its collaborators (i.e. Vuex, axios, etc.)
const createWrapper = (props = {}) => {
wrapper = shallowMount(App, {
propsData: {
path: TEST_TODO_PATH,
...props,
},
});
};
// Helper methods greatly help test maintainability and readability.
const findLoader = () => wrapper.find(GlLoadingIcon);
const findAddButton = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="add-button"]');
const findTextInput = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="text-input"]');
const findTodoData = () => wrapper.findAll('[data-testid="todo-item"]').wrappers.map(wrapper => ({ text: wrapper.text() }));
describe('when mounted and loading', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Create request which will never resolve
mock.onGet(TEST_TODO_PATH).reply(() => new Promise(() => {}));
createWrapper();
});
it('should render the loading state', () => {
expect(findLoader().exists()).toBe(true);
});
});
describe('when todos are loaded', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
createWrapper();
// IMPORTANT: This component fetches data asynchronously on mount, so let's wait for the Vue template to update
return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
});
it('should not show loading', () => {
expect(findLoader().exists()).toBe(false);
});
it('should render todos', () => {
expect(findTodoData()).toEqual(TEST_TODOS);
});
it('when todo is added, should post new todo', () => {
findTextInput().vm.$emit('update', TEST_NEW_TODO)
findAddButton().vm.$emit('click');
return wrapper.vm.$nextTick()
.then(() => {
expect(mock.history.post.map(x => JSON.parse(x.data))).toEqual([{ text: TEST_NEW_TODO }]);
});
});
});
});
Test the component's output
The main return value of a Vue component is the rendered output. In order to test the component we need to test the rendered output. Visit the Vue testing guide.
Events
We should test for events emitted in response to an action within our component, this is useful to verify the correct events are being fired with the correct arguments.
For any DOM events we should use trigger
to fire out event.
// Assuming SomeButton renders: <button>Some button</button>
wrapper = mount(SomeButton);
...
it('should fire the click event', () => {
const btn = wrapper.find('button')
btn.trigger('click');
...
})
When we need to fire a Vue event, we should use emit
to fire our event.
wrapper = shallowMount(DropdownItem);
...
it('should fire the itemClicked event', () => {
DropdownItem.vm.$emit('itemClicked');
...
})
We should verify an event has been fired by asserting against the result of the emitted()
method
Vue.js Expert Role
You should only apply to be a Vue.js expert when your own merge requests and your reviews show:
- Deep understanding of Vue and Vuex reactivity
- Vue and Vuex code are structured according to both official and our guidelines
- Full understanding of testing a Vue and Vuex application
- Vuex code follows the documented pattern
- Knowledge about the existing Vue and Vuex applications and existing reusable components
Vue 2 -> Vue 3 Migration
This section is added temporarily to support the efforts to migrate the codebase from Vue 2.x to Vue 3.x
Currently, we recommend to minimize adding certain features to the codebase to prevent increasing the tech debt for the eventual migration:
- filters;
- event buses;
- functional templated
slot
attributes
You can find more details on Migration to Vue 3
Appendix - Vue component subject under test
This is the template for the example component which is tested in the Testing Vue components section:
<template>
<div class="content">
<gl-loading-icon v-if="isLoading" />
<template v-else>
<div
v-for="todo in todos"
:key="todo.id"
:class="{ 'gl-strike': todo.isDone }"
data-testid="todo-item"
>{{ toddo.text }}</div>
<footer class="gl-border-t-1 gl-mt-3 gl-pt-3">
<gl-form-input
type="text"
v-model="todoText"
data-testid="text-input"
>
<gl-button
variant="success"
data-testid="add-button"
@click="addTodo"
>Add</gl-button>
</footer>
</template>
</div>
</template>