398 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
398 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: Create
|
|
group: Gitaly
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
type: reference
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Gitaly
|
|
|
|
[Gitaly](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly) is the service that provides high-level RPC access to
|
|
Git repositories. Without it, no GitLab components can read or write Git data.
|
|
|
|
In the Gitaly documentation:
|
|
|
|
- **Gitaly server** refers to any node that runs Gitaly itself.
|
|
- **Gitaly client** refers to any node that runs a process that makes requests of the
|
|
Gitaly server. Processes include, but are not limited to:
|
|
- [GitLab Rails application](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab).
|
|
- [GitLab Shell](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell).
|
|
- [GitLab Workhorse](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse).
|
|
|
|
GitLab end users do not have direct access to Gitaly. Gitaly manages only Git
|
|
repository access for GitLab. Other types of GitLab data aren't accessed using Gitaly.
|
|
|
|
<!-- vale gitlab.FutureTense = NO -->
|
|
|
|
WARNING:
|
|
From GitLab 13.0, Gitaly support for NFS is deprecated. As of GitLab 14.0, NFS-related issues
|
|
with Gitaly will no longer be addressed. Upgrade to [Gitaly Cluster](praefect.md) as soon as
|
|
possible. Tools to [enable bulk moves](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/4916)
|
|
of projects to Gitaly Cluster are planned.
|
|
|
|
<!-- vale gitlab.FutureTense = YES -->
|
|
|
|
## Architecture
|
|
|
|
The following is a high-level architecture overview of how Gitaly is used.
|
|
|
|
![Gitaly architecture diagram](img/architecture_v12_4.png)
|
|
|
|
## Configure Gitaly
|
|
|
|
Gitaly comes pre-configured with Omnibus GitLab. For more information on customizing your
|
|
Gitaly installation, see [Configure Gitaly](configure_gitaly.md).
|
|
|
|
## Direct Git access bypassing Gitaly
|
|
|
|
GitLab doesn't advise directly accessing Gitaly repositories stored on disk with
|
|
a Git client, because Gitaly is being continuously improved and changed. These
|
|
improvements may invalidate assumptions, resulting in performance degradation, instability, and even data loss.
|
|
|
|
Gitaly has optimizations, such as the
|
|
[`info/refs` advertisement cache](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/blob/master/doc/design_diskcache.md),
|
|
that rely on Gitaly controlling and monitoring access to repositories by using the
|
|
official gRPC interface. Likewise, Praefect has optimizations, such as fault
|
|
tolerance and distributed reads, that depend on the gRPC interface and
|
|
database to determine repository state.
|
|
|
|
For these reasons, **accessing repositories directly is done at your own risk
|
|
and is not supported**.
|
|
|
|
## Direct access to Git in GitLab
|
|
|
|
Direct access to Git uses code in GitLab known as the "Rugged patches".
|
|
|
|
### History
|
|
|
|
Before Gitaly existed, what are now Gitaly clients used to access Git repositories directly, either:
|
|
|
|
- On a local disk in the case of a single-machine Omnibus GitLab installation
|
|
- Using NFS in the case of a horizontally-scaled GitLab installation.
|
|
|
|
Besides running plain `git` commands, GitLab used to use a Ruby library called
|
|
[Rugged](https://github.com/libgit2/rugged). Rugged is a wrapper around
|
|
[libgit2](https://libgit2.org/), a stand-alone implementation of Git in the form of a C library.
|
|
|
|
Over time it became clear that Rugged, particularly in combination with
|
|
[Unicorn](https://yhbt.net/unicorn/), is extremely efficient. Because `libgit2` is a library and
|
|
not an external process, there was very little overhead between:
|
|
|
|
- GitLab application code that tried to look up data in Git repositories.
|
|
- The Git implementation itself.
|
|
|
|
Because the combination of Rugged and Unicorn was so efficient, the GitLab application code ended up with lots of
|
|
duplicate Git object lookups. For example, looking up the `master` commit a dozen times in one
|
|
request. We could write inefficient code without poor performance.
|
|
|
|
When we migrated these Git lookups to Gitaly calls, we suddenly had a much higher fixed cost per Git
|
|
lookup. Even when Gitaly is able to re-use an already-running `git` process (for example, to look up
|
|
a commit), you still have:
|
|
|
|
- The cost of a network roundtrip to Gitaly.
|
|
- Inside Gitaly, a write/read roundtrip on the Unix pipes that connect Gitaly to the `git` process.
|
|
|
|
Using GitLab.com to measure, we reduced the number of Gitaly calls per request until the loss of
|
|
Rugged's efficiency was no longer felt. It also helped that we run Gitaly itself directly on the Git
|
|
file severs, rather than by using NFS mounts. This gave us a speed boost that counteracted the negative
|
|
effect of not using Rugged anymore.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, other deployments of GitLab could not remove NFS like we did on GitLab.com, and they
|
|
got the worst of both worlds:
|
|
|
|
- The slowness of NFS.
|
|
- The increased inherent overhead of Gitaly.
|
|
|
|
The code removed from GitLab during the Gitaly migration project affected these deployments. As a
|
|
performance workaround for these NFS-based deployments, we re-introduced some of the old Rugged
|
|
code. This re-introduced code is informally referred to as the "Rugged patches".
|
|
|
|
### How it works
|
|
|
|
The Ruby methods that perform direct Git access are behind
|
|
[feature flags](../../development/gitaly.md#legacy-rugged-code), disabled by default. It wasn't
|
|
convenient to set feature flags to get the best performance, so we added an automatic mechanism that
|
|
enables direct Git access.
|
|
|
|
When GitLab calls a function that has a "Rugged patch", it performs two checks:
|
|
|
|
- Is the feature flag for this patch set in the database? If so, the feature flag setting controls
|
|
the GitLab use of "Rugged patch" code.
|
|
- If the feature flag is not set, GitLab tries accessing the file system underneath the
|
|
Gitaly server directly. If it can, it uses the "Rugged patch":
|
|
- If using Unicorn.
|
|
- If using Puma and [thread count](../../install/requirements.md#puma-threads) is set
|
|
to `1`.
|
|
|
|
The result of these checks is cached.
|
|
|
|
To see if GitLab can access the repository file system directly, we use the following heuristic:
|
|
|
|
- Gitaly ensures that the file system has a metadata file in its root with a UUID in it.
|
|
- Gitaly reports this UUID to GitLab by using the `ServerInfo` RPC.
|
|
- GitLab Rails tries to read the metadata file directly. If it exists, and if the UUID's match,
|
|
assume we have direct access.
|
|
|
|
Direct Git access is enable by default in Omnibus GitLab because it fills in the correct repository
|
|
paths in the GitLab configuration file `config/gitlab.yml`. This satisfies the UUID check.
|
|
|
|
WARNING:
|
|
If directly copying repository data from a GitLab server to Gitaly, ensure that the metadata file,
|
|
default path `/var/opt/gitlab/git-data/repositories/.gitaly-metadata`, is not included in the transfer.
|
|
Copying this file causes GitLab to use the Rugged patches for repositories hosted on the Gitaly server,
|
|
leading to `Error creating pipeline` and `Commit not found` errors, or stale data.
|
|
|
|
### Transition to Gitaly Cluster
|
|
|
|
For the sake of removing complexity, we must remove direct Git access in GitLab. However, we can't
|
|
remove it as long some GitLab installations require Git repositories on NFS.
|
|
|
|
There are two facets to our efforts to remove direct Git access in GitLab:
|
|
|
|
- Reduce the number of inefficient Gitaly queries made by GitLab.
|
|
- Persuade administrators of fault-tolerant or horizontally-scaled GitLab instances to migrate off
|
|
NFS.
|
|
|
|
The second facet presents the only real solution. For this, we developed
|
|
[Gitaly Cluster](praefect.md).
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting Gitaly
|
|
|
|
Check [Gitaly timeouts](../../user/admin_area/settings/gitaly_timeouts.md) when troubleshooting
|
|
Gitaly.
|
|
|
|
### Check versions when using standalone Gitaly servers
|
|
|
|
When using standalone Gitaly servers, you must make sure they are the same version
|
|
as GitLab to ensure full compatibility. Check **Admin Area > Overview > Gitaly Servers** on
|
|
your GitLab instance and confirm all Gitaly servers indicate that they are up to date.
|
|
|
|
### `gitaly-debug`
|
|
|
|
The `gitaly-debug` command provides "production debugging" tools for Gitaly and Git
|
|
performance. It is intended to help production engineers and support
|
|
engineers investigate Gitaly performance problems.
|
|
|
|
If you're using GitLab 11.6 or newer, this tool should be installed on
|
|
your GitLab / Gitaly server already at `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/gitaly-debug`.
|
|
If you're investigating an older GitLab version you can compile this
|
|
tool offline and copy the executable to your server:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
git clone https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly.git
|
|
cd cmd/gitaly-debug
|
|
GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go build -o gitaly-debug
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To see the help page of `gitaly-debug` for a list of supported sub-commands, run:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
gitaly-debug -h
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Commits, pushes, and clones return a 401
|
|
|
|
```plaintext
|
|
remote: GitLab: 401 Unauthorized
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You need to sync your `gitlab-secrets.json` file with your Gitaly clients (GitLab
|
|
app nodes).
|
|
|
|
### Client side gRPC logs
|
|
|
|
Gitaly uses the [gRPC](https://grpc.io/) RPC framework. The Ruby gRPC
|
|
client has its own log file which may contain debugging information when
|
|
you are seeing Gitaly errors. You can control the log level of the
|
|
gRPC client with the `GRPC_LOG_LEVEL` environment variable. The
|
|
default level is `WARN`.
|
|
|
|
You can run a gRPC trace with:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
sudo GRPC_TRACE=all GRPC_VERBOSITY=DEBUG gitlab-rake gitlab:gitaly:check
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Correlating Git processes with RPCs
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you need to find out which Gitaly RPC created a particular Git process.
|
|
|
|
One method for doing this is by using `DEBUG` logging. However, this needs to be enabled
|
|
ahead of time and the logs produced are quite verbose.
|
|
|
|
A lightweight method for doing this correlation is by inspecting the environment
|
|
of the Git process (using its `PID`) and looking at the `CORRELATION_ID` variable:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
PID=<Git process ID>
|
|
sudo cat /proc/$PID/environ | tr '\0' '\n' | grep ^CORRELATION_ID=
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This method isn't reliable for `git cat-file` processes, because Gitaly
|
|
internally pools and re-uses those across RPCs.
|
|
|
|
### Observing `gitaly-ruby` traffic
|
|
|
|
[`gitaly-ruby`](configure_gitaly.md#gitaly-ruby) is an internal implementation detail of Gitaly,
|
|
so, there's not that much visibility into what goes on inside
|
|
`gitaly-ruby` processes.
|
|
|
|
If you have Prometheus set up to scrape your Gitaly process, you can see
|
|
request rates and error codes for individual RPCs in `gitaly-ruby` by
|
|
querying `grpc_client_handled_total`. Strictly speaking, this metric does
|
|
not differentiate between `gitaly-ruby` and other RPCs, but in practice
|
|
(as of GitLab 11.9), all gRPC calls made by Gitaly itself are internal
|
|
calls from the main Gitaly process to one of its `gitaly-ruby` sidecars.
|
|
|
|
Assuming your `grpc_client_handled_total` counter observes only Gitaly,
|
|
the following query shows you RPCs are (most likely) internally
|
|
implemented as calls to `gitaly-ruby`:
|
|
|
|
```prometheus
|
|
sum(rate(grpc_client_handled_total[5m])) by (grpc_method) > 0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Repository changes fail with a `401 Unauthorized` error
|
|
|
|
If you run Gitaly on its own server and notice these conditions:
|
|
|
|
- Users can successfully clone and fetch repositories by using both SSH and HTTPS.
|
|
- Users can't push to repositories, or receive a `401 Unauthorized` message when attempting to
|
|
make changes to them in the web UI.
|
|
|
|
Gitaly may be failing to authenticate with the Gitaly client because it has the
|
|
[wrong secrets file](configure_gitaly.md#configure-gitaly-servers).
|
|
|
|
Confirm the following are all true:
|
|
|
|
- When any user performs a `git push` to any repository on this Gitaly server, it
|
|
fails with a `401 Unauthorized` error:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
remote: GitLab: 401 Unauthorized
|
|
To <REMOTE_URL>
|
|
! [remote rejected] branch-name -> branch-name (pre-receive hook declined)
|
|
error: failed to push some refs to '<REMOTE_URL>'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- When any user adds or modifies a file from the repository using the GitLab
|
|
UI, it immediately fails with a red `401 Unauthorized` banner.
|
|
- Creating a new project and [initializing it with a README](../../user/project/working_with_projects.md#blank-projects)
|
|
successfully creates the project, but doesn't create the README.
|
|
- When [tailing the logs](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/logs.html#tail-logs-in-a-console-on-the-server)
|
|
on a Gitaly client and reproducing the error, you get `401` errors
|
|
when reaching the [`/api/v4/internal/allowed`](../../development/internal_api.md) endpoint:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
# api_json.log
|
|
{
|
|
"time": "2019-07-18T00:30:14.967Z",
|
|
"severity": "INFO",
|
|
"duration": 0.57,
|
|
"db": 0,
|
|
"view": 0.57,
|
|
"status": 401,
|
|
"method": "POST",
|
|
"path": "\/api\/v4\/internal\/allowed",
|
|
"params": [
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "action",
|
|
"value": "git-receive-pack"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "changes",
|
|
"value": "REDACTED"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "gl_repository",
|
|
"value": "REDACTED"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "project",
|
|
"value": "\/path\/to\/project.git"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "protocol",
|
|
"value": "web"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "env",
|
|
"value": "{\"GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES\":[],\"GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES_RELATIVE\":[],\"GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY\":null,\"GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE\":null}"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "user_id",
|
|
"value": "2"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "secret_token",
|
|
"value": "[FILTERED]"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"host": "gitlab.example.com",
|
|
"ip": "REDACTED",
|
|
"ua": "Ruby",
|
|
"route": "\/api\/:version\/internal\/allowed",
|
|
"queue_duration": 4.24,
|
|
"gitaly_calls": 0,
|
|
"gitaly_duration": 0,
|
|
"correlation_id": "XPUZqTukaP3"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# nginx_access.log
|
|
[IP] - - [18/Jul/2019:00:30:14 +0000] "POST /api/v4/internal/allowed HTTP/1.1" 401 30 "" "Ruby"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To fix this problem, confirm that your [`gitlab-secrets.json` file](configure_gitaly.md#configure-gitaly-servers)
|
|
on the Gitaly server matches the one on Gitaly client. If it doesn't match,
|
|
update the secrets file on the Gitaly server to match the Gitaly client, then
|
|
[reconfigure](../restart_gitlab.md#omnibus-gitlab-reconfigure).
|
|
|
|
### Command line tools cannot connect to Gitaly
|
|
|
|
If you can't connect to a Gitaly server with command line (CLI) tools,
|
|
and certain actions result in a `14: Connect Failed` error message,
|
|
gRPC cannot reach your Gitaly server.
|
|
|
|
Verify you can reach Gitaly by using TCP:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:tcp_check[GITALY_SERVER_IP,GITALY_LISTEN_PORT]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If the TCP connection fails, check your network settings and your firewall rules.
|
|
If the TCP connection succeeds, your networking and firewall rules are correct.
|
|
|
|
If you use proxy servers in your command line environment, such as Bash, these
|
|
can interfere with your gRPC traffic.
|
|
|
|
If you use Bash or a compatible command line environment, run the following commands
|
|
to determine whether you have proxy servers configured:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
echo $http_proxy
|
|
echo $https_proxy
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If either of these variables have a value, your Gitaly CLI connections may be
|
|
getting routed through a proxy which cannot connect to Gitaly.
|
|
|
|
To remove the proxy setting, run the following commands (depending on which variables had values):
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
unset http_proxy
|
|
unset https_proxy
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Permission denied errors appearing in Gitaly logs when accessing repositories from a standalone Gitaly server
|
|
|
|
If this error occurs even though file permissions are correct, it's likely that
|
|
the Gitaly server is experiencing
|
|
[clock drift](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_drift).
|
|
|
|
Ensure the Gitaly clients and servers are synchronized, and use an NTP time
|
|
server to keep them synchronized, if possible.
|
|
|
|
### Praefect
|
|
|
|
Praefect is a router and transaction manager for Gitaly, and a required
|
|
component for running a Gitaly Cluster. For more information see [Gitaly Cluster](praefect.md).
|