339 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
339 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
stage: none
|
||
group: unassigned
|
||
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# API style guide
|
||
|
||
This style guide recommends best practices for API development.
|
||
|
||
## Instance variables
|
||
|
||
Please do not use instance variables, there is no need for them (we don't need
|
||
to access them as we do in Rails views), local variables are fine.
|
||
|
||
## Entities
|
||
|
||
Always use an [Entity](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/entities) to present the endpoint's payload.
|
||
|
||
## Documentation
|
||
|
||
Each new or updated API endpoint must come with documentation, unless it is internal or behind a feature flag.
|
||
The docs should be in the same merge request, or, if strictly necessary,
|
||
in a follow-up with the same milestone as the original merge request.
|
||
|
||
See the [Documentation Style Guide RESTful API page](documentation/restful_api_styleguide.md) for details on documenting API resources in Markdown as well as in OpenAPI definition files.
|
||
|
||
## Methods and parameters description
|
||
|
||
Every method must be described using the [Grape DSL](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape#describing-methods)
|
||
(see [`environments.rb`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/environments.rb)
|
||
for a good example):
|
||
|
||
- `desc` for the method summary. You should pass it a block for additional
|
||
details such as:
|
||
- The GitLab version when the endpoint was added. If it is behind a feature flag, mention that instead: _This feature is gated by the :feature\_flag\_symbol feature flag._
|
||
- If the endpoint is deprecated, and if so, its planned removal date
|
||
|
||
- `params` for the method parameters. This acts as description,
|
||
[validation, and coercion of the parameters](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape#parameter-validation-and-coercion)
|
||
|
||
A good example is as follows:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
desc 'Get all broadcast messages' do
|
||
detail 'This feature was introduced in GitLab 8.12.'
|
||
success Entities::BroadcastMessage
|
||
end
|
||
params do
|
||
optional :page, type: Integer, desc: 'Current page number'
|
||
optional :per_page, type: Integer, desc: 'Number of messages per page'
|
||
end
|
||
get do
|
||
messages = BroadcastMessage.all
|
||
|
||
present paginate(messages), with: Entities::BroadcastMessage
|
||
end
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Declared parameters
|
||
|
||
Grape allows you to access only the parameters that have been declared by your
|
||
`params` block. It filters out the parameters that have been passed, but are not
|
||
allowed.
|
||
|
||
– <https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape#declared>
|
||
|
||
### Exclude parameters from parent namespaces
|
||
|
||
By default `declared(params)`includes parameters that were defined in all
|
||
parent namespaces.
|
||
|
||
– <https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape#include-parent-namespaces>
|
||
|
||
In most cases you should exclude parameters from the parent namespaces:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
declared(params, include_parent_namespaces: false)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### When to use `declared(params)`
|
||
|
||
You should always use `declared(params)` when you pass the parameters hash as
|
||
arguments to a method call.
|
||
|
||
For instance:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
# bad
|
||
User.create(params) # imagine the user submitted `admin=1`... :)
|
||
|
||
# good
|
||
User.create(declared(params, include_parent_namespaces: false).to_h)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
NOTE:
|
||
`declared(params)` return a `Hashie::Mash` object, on which you must
|
||
call `.to_h`.
|
||
|
||
But we can use `params[key]` directly when we access single elements.
|
||
|
||
For instance:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
# good
|
||
Model.create(foo: params[:foo])
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Array types
|
||
|
||
With Grape v1.3+, Array types must be defined with a `coerce_with`
|
||
block, or parameters, fails to validate when passed a string from an
|
||
API request. See the
|
||
[Grape upgrading documentation](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/blob/master/UPGRADING.md#ensure-that-array-types-have-explicit-coercions)
|
||
for more details.
|
||
|
||
### Automatic coercion of nil inputs
|
||
|
||
Prior to Grape v1.3.3, Array parameters with `nil` values would
|
||
automatically be coerced to an empty Array. However, due to
|
||
[this pull request in v1.3.3](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/pull/2040), this
|
||
is no longer the case. For example, suppose you define a PUT `/test`
|
||
request that has an optional parameter:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
optional :user_ids, type: Array[Integer], coerce_with: ::API::Validations::Types::CommaSeparatedToIntegerArray.coerce, desc: 'The user ids for this rule'
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Normally, a request to PUT `/test?user_ids` would cause Grape to pass
|
||
`params` of `{ user_ids: nil }`.
|
||
|
||
This may introduce errors with endpoints that expect a blank array and
|
||
do not handle `nil` inputs properly. To preserve the previous behavior,
|
||
there is a helper method `coerce_nil_params_to_array!` that is used
|
||
in the `before` block of all API calls:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
before do
|
||
coerce_nil_params_to_array!
|
||
end
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
With this change, a request to PUT `/test?user_ids` causes Grape to
|
||
pass `params` to be `{ user_ids: [] }`.
|
||
|
||
There is [an open issue in the Grape tracker](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/issues/2068)
|
||
to make this easier.
|
||
|
||
## Using HTTP status helpers
|
||
|
||
For non-200 HTTP responses, use the provided helpers in `lib/api/helpers.rb` to ensure correct behavior (like `not_found!` or `no_content!`). These `throw` inside Grape and abort the execution of your endpoint.
|
||
|
||
For `DELETE` requests, you should also generally use the `destroy_conditionally!` helper which by default returns a `204 No Content` response on success, or a `412 Precondition Failed` response if the given `If-Unmodified-Since` header is out of range. This helper calls `#destroy` on the passed resource, but you can also implement a custom deletion method by passing a block.
|
||
|
||
## Choosing HTTP verbs
|
||
|
||
When defining a new [API route](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape#routes), use
|
||
the correct [HTTP request method](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods).
|
||
|
||
### Deciding between `PATCH` and `PUT`
|
||
|
||
In a Rails application, both the `PATCH` and `PUT` request methods are routed to
|
||
the `update` method in controllers. With Grape, the framework we use to write
|
||
the GitLab API, you must explicitly set the `PATCH` or `PUT` HTTP verb for an
|
||
endpoint that does updates.
|
||
|
||
If the endpoint updates *all* attributes of a given resource, use the
|
||
[`PUT`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods/PUT) request
|
||
method. If the endpoint updates *some* attributes of a given resource, use the
|
||
[`PATCH`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods/PATCH)
|
||
request method.
|
||
|
||
Here is a good example for `PATCH`: [`PATCH /projects/:id/protected_branches/:name`](../api/protected_branches.md#update-a-protected-branch)
|
||
Here is a good example for `PUT`: [`PUT /projects/:id/merge_requests/:merge_request_iid/approve`](../api/merge_request_approvals.md#approve-merge-request)
|
||
|
||
Often, a good `PUT` endpoint only has ids and a verb (in the example above, "approve").
|
||
Or, they only have a single value and represent a key/value pair.
|
||
|
||
The [Rails blog](https://rubyonrails.org/2012/2/26/edge-rails-patch-is-the-new-primary-http-method-for-updates)
|
||
has a detailed explanation of why `PATCH` is usually the most apt verb for web
|
||
API endpoints that perform an update.
|
||
|
||
## Using API path helpers in GitLab Rails codebase
|
||
|
||
Because we support [installing GitLab under a relative URL](../install/relative_url.md), one must take this
|
||
into account when using API path helpers generated by Grape. Any such API path
|
||
helper usage must be in wrapped into the `expose_path` helper call.
|
||
|
||
For instance:
|
||
|
||
```haml
|
||
- endpoint = expose_path(api_v4_projects_issues_related_merge_requests_path(id: @project.id, issue_iid: @issue.iid))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Custom Validators
|
||
|
||
In order to validate some parameters in the API request, we validate them
|
||
before sending them further (say Gitaly). The following are the
|
||
[custom validators](https://GitLab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/lib/api/validations/validators),
|
||
which we have added so far and how to use them. We also wrote a
|
||
guide on how you can add a new custom validator.
|
||
|
||
### Using custom validators
|
||
|
||
- `FilePath`:
|
||
|
||
GitLab supports various functionalities where we need to traverse a file path.
|
||
The [`FilePath` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/file_path.rb)
|
||
validates the parameter value for different cases. Mainly, it checks whether a
|
||
path is relative and does it contain `../../` relative traversal using
|
||
`File::Separator` or not, and whether the path is absolute, for example
|
||
`/etc/passwd/`. By default, absolute paths are not allowed. However, you can optionally pass in an allowlist for allowed absolute paths in the following way:
|
||
`requires :file_path, type: String, file_path: { allowlist: ['/foo/bar/', '/home/foo/', '/app/home'] }`
|
||
|
||
- `Git SHA`:
|
||
|
||
The [`Git SHA` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/git_sha.rb)
|
||
checks whether the Git SHA parameter is a valid SHA.
|
||
It checks by using the regex mentioned in [`commit.rb`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commit/b9857d8b662a2dbbf54f46ecdcecb44702affe55#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_30_30) file.
|
||
|
||
- `Absence`:
|
||
|
||
The [`Absence` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/absence.rb)
|
||
checks whether a particular parameter is absent in a given parameters hash.
|
||
|
||
- `IntegerNoneAny`:
|
||
|
||
The [`IntegerNoneAny` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/integer_none_any.rb)
|
||
checks if the value of the given parameter is either an `Integer`, `None`, or `Any`.
|
||
It allows only either of these mentioned values to move forward in the request.
|
||
|
||
- `ArrayNoneAny`:
|
||
|
||
The [`ArrayNoneAny` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/array_none_any.rb)
|
||
checks if the value of the given parameter is either an `Array`, `None`, or `Any`.
|
||
It allows only either of these mentioned values to move forward in the request.
|
||
|
||
- `EmailOrEmailList`:
|
||
|
||
The [`EmailOrEmailList` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/email_or_email_list.rb)
|
||
checks if the value of a string or a list of strings contains only valid
|
||
email addresses. It allows only lists with all valid email addresses to move forward in the request.
|
||
|
||
### Adding a new custom validator
|
||
|
||
Custom validators are a great way to validate parameters before sending
|
||
them to platform for further processing. It saves some back-and-forth
|
||
from the server to the platform if we identify invalid parameters at the beginning.
|
||
|
||
If you need to add a custom validator, it would be added to
|
||
it's own file in the [`validators`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators) directory.
|
||
Since we use [Grape](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape) to add our API
|
||
we inherit from the `Grape::Validations::Base` class in our validator class.
|
||
Now, all you have to do is define the `validate_param!` method which takes
|
||
in two parameters: the `params` hash and the `param` name to validate.
|
||
|
||
The body of the method does the hard work of validating the parameter value
|
||
and returns appropriate error messages to the caller method.
|
||
|
||
Lastly, we register the validator using the line below:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
Grape::Validations.register_validator(<validator name as symbol>, ::API::Helpers::CustomValidators::<YourCustomValidatorClassName>)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Once you add the validator, make sure you add the `rspec`s for it into
|
||
it's own file in the [`validators`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/spec/lib/api/validations/validators) directory.
|
||
|
||
## Internal API
|
||
|
||
The [internal API](internal_api/index.md) is documented for internal use. Please keep it up to date so we know what endpoints
|
||
different components are making use of.
|
||
|
||
## Avoiding N+1 problems
|
||
|
||
In order to avoid N+1 problems that are common when returning collections
|
||
of records in an API endpoint, we should use eager loading.
|
||
|
||
A standard way to do this within the API is for models to implement a
|
||
scope called `with_api_entity_associations` that preloads the
|
||
associations and data returned in the API. An example of this scope can
|
||
be seen in
|
||
[the `Issue` model](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/2fedc47b97837ea08c3016cf2fb773a0300a4a25/app%2Fmodels%2Fissue.rb#L62).
|
||
|
||
In situations where the same model has multiple entities in the API
|
||
(for instance, `UserBasic`, `User` and `UserPublic`) you should use your
|
||
discretion with applying this scope. It may be that you optimize for the
|
||
most basic entity, with successive entities building upon that scope.
|
||
|
||
The `with_api_entity_associations` scope also
|
||
[automatically preloads data](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/19f74903240e209736c7668132e6a5a735954e7c/app%2Fmodels%2Ftodo.rb#L34)
|
||
for `Todo` _targets_ when returned in the [to-dos API](../api/todos.md).
|
||
|
||
For more context and discussion about preloading see
|
||
[this merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/merge_requests/25711)
|
||
which introduced the scope.
|
||
|
||
### Verifying with tests
|
||
|
||
When an API endpoint returns collections, always add a test to verify
|
||
that the API endpoint does not have an N+1 problem, now and in the future.
|
||
We can do this using [`ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder`](database/query_recorder.md).
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
def make_api_request
|
||
get api('/foo', personal_access_token: pat)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
it 'avoids N+1 queries', :request_store do
|
||
# Firstly, record how many PostgreSQL queries the endpoint will make
|
||
# when it returns a single record
|
||
create_record
|
||
|
||
control = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new { make_api_request }
|
||
|
||
# Now create a second record and ensure that the API does not execute
|
||
# any more queries than before
|
||
create_record
|
||
|
||
expect { make_api_request }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control)
|
||
end
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Testing
|
||
|
||
When writing tests for new API endpoints, consider using a schema [fixture](testing_guide/best_practices.md#fixtures) located in `/spec/fixtures/api/schemas`. You can `expect` a response to match a given schema:
|
||
|
||
```ruby
|
||
expect(response).to match_response_schema('merge_requests')
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Also see [verifying N+1 performance](#verifying-with-tests) in tests.
|
||
|
||
## Include a changelog entry
|
||
|
||
All client-facing changes **must** include a [changelog entry](changelog.md).
|
||
This does not include internal APIs.
|