567 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
567 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: none
|
|
group: unassigned
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Go standards and style guidelines
|
|
|
|
This document describes various guidelines and best practices for GitLab
|
|
projects using the [Go language](https://go.dev/).
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
GitLab is built on top of [Ruby on Rails](https://rubyonrails.org/), but we're
|
|
also using Go for projects where it makes sense. Go is a very powerful
|
|
language, with many advantages, and is best suited for projects with a lot of
|
|
IO (disk/network access), HTTP requests, parallel processing, and so on. Since we
|
|
have both Ruby on Rails and Go at GitLab, we should evaluate carefully which of
|
|
the two is best for the job.
|
|
|
|
This page aims to define and organize our Go guidelines, based on our various
|
|
experiences. Several projects were started with different standards and they
|
|
can still have specifics. They are described in their respective
|
|
`README.md` or `PROCESS.md` files.
|
|
|
|
## Go language versions
|
|
|
|
The Go upgrade documentation [provides an overview](go_upgrade.md#overview)
|
|
of how GitLab manages and ships Go binary support.
|
|
|
|
If a GitLab component requires a newer version of Go, please
|
|
follow the [upgrade process](go_upgrade.md#updating-go-version) to ensure no customer, team, or component is adversely impacted.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, individual projects must also [manage builds with multiple versions of Go](go_upgrade.md#supporting-multiple-go-versions).
|
|
|
|
## Dependency Management
|
|
|
|
Go uses a source-based strategy for dependency management. Dependencies are
|
|
downloaded as source from their source repository. This differs from the more
|
|
common artifact-based strategy where dependencies are downloaded as artifacts
|
|
from a package repository that is separate from the dependency's source
|
|
repository.
|
|
|
|
Go did not have first-class support for version management prior to 1.11. That
|
|
version introduced Go modules and the use of semantic versioning. Go 1.12
|
|
introduced module proxies, which can serve as an intermediate between clients
|
|
and source version control systems, and checksum databases, which can be used to
|
|
verify the integrity of dependency downloads.
|
|
|
|
See [Dependency Management in Go](dependencies.md) for more details.
|
|
|
|
## Code Review
|
|
|
|
We follow the common principles of
|
|
[Go Code Review Comments](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments).
|
|
|
|
Reviewers and maintainers should pay attention to:
|
|
|
|
- `defer` functions: ensure the presence when needed, and after `err` check.
|
|
- Inject dependencies as parameters.
|
|
- Void structs when marshaling to JSON (generates `null` instead of `[]`).
|
|
|
|
### Security
|
|
|
|
Security is our top priority at GitLab. During code reviews, we must take care
|
|
of possible security breaches in our code:
|
|
|
|
- XSS when using text/template
|
|
- CSRF Protection using Gorilla
|
|
- Use a Go version without known vulnerabilities
|
|
- Don't leak secret tokens
|
|
- SQL injections
|
|
|
|
Remember to run
|
|
[SAST](../../user/application_security/sast/index.md) and [Dependency Scanning](../../user/application_security/dependency_scanning/index.md)
|
|
**(ULTIMATE)** on your project (or at least the
|
|
[`gosec` analyzer](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/gosec)),
|
|
and to follow our [Security requirements](../code_review.md#security).
|
|
|
|
Web servers can take advantages of middlewares like [Secure](https://github.com/unrolled/secure).
|
|
|
|
### Finding a reviewer
|
|
|
|
Many of our projects are too small to have full-time maintainers. That's why we
|
|
have a shared pool of Go reviewers at GitLab. To find a reviewer, use the
|
|
["Go" section](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/projects/#gitlab_reviewers_go)
|
|
of the "GitLab" project on the Engineering Projects
|
|
page in the handbook.
|
|
|
|
To add yourself to this list, add the following to your profile in the
|
|
[`team.yml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/data/team.yml)
|
|
file and ask your manager to review and merge.
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
projects:
|
|
gitlab: reviewer go
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Code style and format
|
|
|
|
- Avoid global variables, even in packages. By doing so you introduce side
|
|
effects if the package is included multiple times.
|
|
- Use `goimports` before committing.
|
|
[`goimports`](https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/tools/cmd/goimports)
|
|
is a tool that automatically formats Go source code using
|
|
[`Gofmt`](https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/gofmt), in addition to formatting import lines,
|
|
adding missing ones and removing unreferenced ones.
|
|
|
|
Most editors/IDEs allow you to run commands before/after saving a file, you can set it
|
|
up to run `goimports` so that it's applied to every file when saving.
|
|
- Place private methods below the first caller method in the source file.
|
|
|
|
### Automatic linting
|
|
|
|
All Go projects should include these GitLab CI/CD jobs:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
lint:
|
|
image: registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-build-images:golangci-lint-alpine
|
|
stage: test
|
|
script:
|
|
# Use default .golangci.yml file from the image if one is not present in the project root.
|
|
- '[ -e .golangci.yml ] || cp /golangci/.golangci.yml .'
|
|
# Write the code coverage report to gl-code-quality-report.json
|
|
# and print linting issues to stdout in the format: path/to/file:line description
|
|
# remove `--issues-exit-code 0` or set to non-zero to fail the job if linting issues are detected
|
|
- golangci-lint run --issues-exit-code 0 --print-issued-lines=false --out-format code-climate:gl-code-quality-report.json,line-number
|
|
artifacts:
|
|
reports:
|
|
codequality: gl-code-quality-report.json
|
|
paths:
|
|
- gl-code-quality-report.json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Including a `.golangci.yml` in the root directory of the project allows for
|
|
configuration of `golangci-lint`. All options for `golangci-lint` are listed in
|
|
this [example](https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/blob/master/.golangci.yml).
|
|
|
|
Once [recursive includes](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/56836)
|
|
become available, you can share job templates like this
|
|
[analyzer](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/ci-templates/raw/master/includes-dev/analyzer.yml).
|
|
|
|
Go GitLab linter plugins are maintained in the [`gitlab-org/language-tools/go/linters`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/language-tools/go/linters/) namespace.
|
|
|
|
## Dependencies
|
|
|
|
Dependencies should be kept to the minimum. The introduction of a new
|
|
dependency should be argued in the merge request, as per our [Approval Guidelines](../code_review.md#approval-guidelines).
|
|
Both [License Scanning](../../user/compliance/license_compliance/index.md)
|
|
and [Dependency Scanning](../../user/application_security/dependency_scanning/index.md)
|
|
should be activated on all projects to ensure new dependencies
|
|
security status and license compatibility.
|
|
|
|
### Modules
|
|
|
|
In Go 1.11 and later, a standard dependency system is available behind the name
|
|
[Go Modules](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Modules). It provides a way to
|
|
define and lock dependencies for reproducible builds. It should be used
|
|
whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
When Go Modules are in use, there should not be a `vendor/` directory. Instead,
|
|
Go automatically downloads dependencies when they are needed to build the
|
|
project. This is in line with how dependencies are handled with Bundler in Ruby
|
|
projects, and makes merge requests easier to review.
|
|
|
|
In some cases, such as building a Go project for it to act as a dependency of a
|
|
CI run for another project, removing the `vendor/` directory means the code must
|
|
be downloaded repeatedly, which can lead to intermittent problems due to rate
|
|
limiting or network failures. In these circumstances, you should
|
|
[cache the downloaded code between](../../ci/caching/index.md#cache-go-dependencies).
|
|
|
|
There was a
|
|
[bug on modules checksums](https://github.com/golang/go/issues/29278) in Go versions earlier than v1.11.4, so make
|
|
sure to use at least this version to avoid `checksum mismatch` errors.
|
|
|
|
### ORM
|
|
|
|
We don't use object-relational mapping libraries (ORMs) at GitLab (except
|
|
[ActiveRecord](https://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_basics.html) in
|
|
Ruby on Rails). Projects can be structured with services to avoid them.
|
|
[`pgx`](https://github.com/jackc/pgx) should be enough to interact with PostgreSQL
|
|
databases.
|
|
|
|
### Migrations
|
|
|
|
In the rare event of managing a hosted database, it's necessary to use a
|
|
migration system like ActiveRecord is providing. A simple library like
|
|
[Journey](https://github.com/db-journey/journey), designed to be used in
|
|
`postgres` containers, can be deployed as long-running pods. New versions
|
|
deploy a new pod, migrating the data automatically.
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
### Testing frameworks
|
|
|
|
We should not use any specific library or framework for testing, as the
|
|
[standard library](https://pkg.go.dev/std) provides already everything to get
|
|
started. If there is a need for more sophisticated testing tools, the following
|
|
external dependencies might be worth considering in case we decide to use a specific
|
|
library or framework:
|
|
|
|
- [Testify](https://github.com/stretchr/testify)
|
|
- [`httpexpect`](https://github.com/gavv/httpexpect)
|
|
|
|
### Subtests
|
|
|
|
Use [subtests](https://go.dev/blog/subtests) whenever possible to improve
|
|
code readability and test output.
|
|
|
|
### Better output in tests
|
|
|
|
When comparing expected and actual values in tests, use
|
|
[`testify/require.Equal`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/require#Equal),
|
|
[`testify/require.EqualError`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/require#EqualError),
|
|
[`testify/require.EqualValues`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/require#EqualValues),
|
|
and others to improve readability when comparing structs, errors,
|
|
large portions of text, or JSON documents:
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
type TestData struct {
|
|
// ...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func FuncUnderTest() TestData {
|
|
// ...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func Test(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Run("FuncUnderTest", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
want := TestData{}
|
|
got := FuncUnderTest()
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, want, got) // note that expected value comes first, then comes the actual one ("diff" semantics)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Table-Driven Tests
|
|
|
|
Using [Table-Driven Tests](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/TableDrivenTests)
|
|
is generally good practice when you have multiple entries of
|
|
inputs/outputs for the same function. Below are some guidelines one can
|
|
follow when writing table-driven test. These guidelines are mostly
|
|
extracted from Go standard library source code. Keep in mind it's OK not
|
|
to follow these guidelines when it makes sense.
|
|
|
|
#### Defining test cases
|
|
|
|
Each table entry is a complete test case with inputs and expected
|
|
results, and sometimes with additional information such as a test name
|
|
to make the test output easily readable.
|
|
|
|
- [Define a slice of anonymous struct](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/50bd1c4d4eb4fac8ddeb5f063c099daccfb71b26/src/encoding/csv/reader_test.go#L16)
|
|
inside of the test.
|
|
- [Define a slice of anonymous struct](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/55d31e16c12c38d36811bdee65ac1f7772148250/src/cmd/go/internal/module/module_test.go#L9-L66)
|
|
outside of the test.
|
|
- [Named structs](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/2e0cd2aef5924e48e1ceb74e3d52e76c56dd34cc/src/cmd/go/internal/modfetch/coderepo_test.go#L54-L69)
|
|
for code reuse.
|
|
- [Using `map[string]struct{}`](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/6d5caf38e37bf9aeba3291f1f0b0081f934b1187/src/cmd/trace/annotations_test.go#L180-L235).
|
|
|
|
#### Contents of the test case
|
|
|
|
- Ideally, each test case should have a field with a unique identifier
|
|
to use for naming subtests. In the Go standard library, this is commonly the
|
|
`name string` field.
|
|
- Use `want`/`expect`/`actual` when you are specifying something in the
|
|
test case that is used for assertion.
|
|
|
|
#### Variable names
|
|
|
|
- Each table-driven test map/slice of struct can be named `tests`.
|
|
- When looping through `tests` the anonymous struct can be referred
|
|
to as `tt` or `tc`.
|
|
- The description of the test can be referred to as
|
|
`name`/`testName`/`tn`.
|
|
|
|
### Benchmarks
|
|
|
|
Programs handling a lot of IO or complex operations should always include
|
|
[benchmarks](https://pkg.go.dev/testing#hdr-Benchmarks), to ensure
|
|
performance consistency over time.
|
|
|
|
## Error handling
|
|
|
|
### Adding context
|
|
|
|
Adding context before you return the error can be helpful, instead of
|
|
just returning the error. This allows developers to understand what the
|
|
program was trying to do when it entered the error state making it much
|
|
easier to debug.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
// Wrap the error
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("get cache %s: %w", f.Name, err)
|
|
|
|
// Just add context
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("saving cache %s: %v", f.Name, err)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
A few things to keep in mind when adding context:
|
|
|
|
- Decide if you want to expose the underlying error
|
|
to the caller. If so, use `%w`, if not, you can use `%v`.
|
|
- Don't use words like `failed`, `error`, `didn't`. As it's an error,
|
|
the user already knows that something failed and this might lead to
|
|
having strings like `failed xx failed xx failed xx`. Explain _what_
|
|
failed instead.
|
|
- Error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a
|
|
newline. You can use `golint` to check for this.
|
|
|
|
### Naming
|
|
|
|
- When using sentinel errors they should always be named like `ErrXxx`.
|
|
- When creating a new error type they should always be named like
|
|
`XxxError`.
|
|
|
|
### Checking Error types
|
|
|
|
- To check error equality don't use `==`. Use
|
|
[`errors.Is`](https://pkg.go.dev/errors?tab=doc#Is) instead (for Go
|
|
versions >= 1.13).
|
|
- To check if the error is of a certain type don't use type assertion,
|
|
use [`errors.As`](https://pkg.go.dev/errors?tab=doc#As) instead (for
|
|
Go versions >= 1.13).
|
|
|
|
### References for working with errors
|
|
|
|
- [Go 1.13 errors](https://go.dev/blog/go1.13-errors).
|
|
- [Programing with errors](https://peter.bourgon.org/blog/2019/09/11/programming-with-errors.html).
|
|
- [Don't just check errors, handle them gracefully](https://dave.cheney.net/2016/04/27/dont-just-check-errors-handle-them-gracefully).
|
|
|
|
## CLIs
|
|
|
|
Every Go program is launched from the command line.
|
|
[`cli`](https://github.com/urfave/cli) is a convenient package to create command
|
|
line apps. It should be used whether the project is a daemon or a simple CLI
|
|
tool. Flags can be mapped to [environment variables](https://github.com/urfave/cli#values-from-the-environment) directly,
|
|
which documents and centralizes at the same time all the possible command line
|
|
interactions with the program. Don't use `os.GetEnv`, it hides variables deep
|
|
in the code.
|
|
|
|
## Daemons
|
|
|
|
### Logging
|
|
|
|
The usage of a logging library is strongly recommended for daemons. Even
|
|
though there is a `log` package in the standard library, we generally use
|
|
[Logrus](https://github.com/sirupsen/logrus). Its plugin ("hooks") system
|
|
makes it a powerful logging library, with the ability to add notifiers and
|
|
formatters at the logger level directly.
|
|
|
|
#### Structured (JSON) logging
|
|
|
|
Every binary ideally must have structured (JSON) logging in place as it helps
|
|
with searching and filtering the logs. At GitLab we use structured logging in
|
|
JSON format, as all our infrastructure assumes that. When using
|
|
[Logrus](https://github.com/sirupsen/logrus) you can turn on structured
|
|
logging by using the build in [JSON formatter](https://github.com/sirupsen/logrus#formatters). This follows the
|
|
same logging type we use in our [Ruby applications](../logging.md#use-structured-json-logging).
|
|
|
|
#### How to use Logrus
|
|
|
|
There are a few guidelines one should follow when using the
|
|
[Logrus](https://github.com/sirupsen/logrus) package:
|
|
|
|
- When printing an error use
|
|
[WithError](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/sirupsen/logrus#WithError). For
|
|
example, `logrus.WithError(err).Error("Failed to do something")`.
|
|
- Since we use [structured logging](#structured-json-logging) we can log
|
|
fields in the context of that code path, such as the URI of the request using
|
|
[`WithField`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/sirupsen/logrus#WithField) or
|
|
[`WithFields`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/sirupsen/logrus#WithFields). For
|
|
example, `logrus.WithField("file", "/app/go").Info("Opening dir")`. If you
|
|
have to log multiple keys, always use `WithFields` instead of calling
|
|
`WithField` more than once.
|
|
|
|
### Tracing and Correlation
|
|
|
|
[LabKit](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit) is a place to keep common
|
|
libraries for Go services. Currently it's vendored into two projects:
|
|
Workhorse and Gitaly, and it exports two main (but related) pieces of
|
|
functionality:
|
|
|
|
- [`gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit/correlation`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit/tree/master/correlation):
|
|
for propagating and extracting correlation ids between services.
|
|
- [`gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit/tracing`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit/tree/master/tracing):
|
|
for instrumenting Go libraries for distributed tracing.
|
|
|
|
This gives us a thin abstraction over underlying implementations that is
|
|
consistent across Workhorse, Gitaly, and, in future, other Go servers. For
|
|
example, in the case of `gitlab.com/gitlab-org/labkit/tracing` we can switch
|
|
from using `Opentracing` directly to using `Zipkin` or the Go kit's own tracing wrapper
|
|
without changes to the application code, while still keeping the same
|
|
consistent configuration mechanism (that is, the `GITLAB_TRACING` environment
|
|
variable).
|
|
|
|
### Context
|
|
|
|
Since daemons are long-running applications, they should have mechanisms to
|
|
manage cancellations, and avoid unnecessary resources consumption (which could
|
|
lead to DDoS vulnerabilities). [Go Context](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#contexts)
|
|
should be used in functions that can block and passed as the first parameter.
|
|
|
|
## Dockerfiles
|
|
|
|
Every project should have a `Dockerfile` at the root of their repository, to
|
|
build and run the project. Since Go program are static binaries, they should
|
|
not require any external dependency, and shells in the final image are useless.
|
|
We encourage [Multistage builds](https://docs.docker.com/build/building/multi-stage/):
|
|
|
|
- They let the user build the project with the right Go version and
|
|
dependencies.
|
|
- They generate a small, self-contained image, derived from `Scratch`.
|
|
|
|
Generated Docker images should have the program at their `Entrypoint` to create
|
|
portable commands. That way, anyone can run the image, and without parameters
|
|
it displays its help message (if `cli` has been used).
|
|
|
|
## Secure Team standards and style guidelines
|
|
|
|
The following are some style guidelines that are specific to the Secure Team.
|
|
|
|
### Code style and format
|
|
|
|
Use `goimports -local gitlab.com/gitlab-org` before committing.
|
|
[`goimports`](https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/tools/cmd/goimports)
|
|
is a tool that automatically formats Go source code using
|
|
[`Gofmt`](https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/gofmt), in addition to formatting import lines,
|
|
adding missing ones and removing unreferenced ones.
|
|
By using the `-local gitlab.com/gitlab-org` option, `goimports` groups locally referenced
|
|
packages separately from external ones. See
|
|
[the imports section](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports)
|
|
of the Code Review Comments page on the Go wiki for more details.
|
|
Most editors/IDEs allow you to run commands before/after saving a file, you can set it
|
|
up to run `goimports -local gitlab.com/gitlab-org` so that it's applied to every file when saving.
|
|
|
|
### Naming branches
|
|
|
|
In addition to the GitLab [branch name rules](../../user/project/repository/branches/index.md#name-your-branch), use only the characters `a-z`, `0-9` or `-` in branch names. This restriction is because `go get` doesn't work as expected when a branch name contains certain characters, such as a slash `/`:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ go get -u gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/report/v3@some-user/some-feature
|
|
|
|
go get: gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/report/v3@some-user/some-feature: invalid version: version "some-user/some-feature" invalid: disallowed version string
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If a branch name contains a slash, it forces us to refer to the commit SHA instead, which is less flexible. For example:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ go get -u gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/report/v3@5c9a4279fa1263755718cf069d54ba8051287954
|
|
|
|
go: downloading gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/report/v3 v3.15.3-0.20221012172609-5c9a4279fa12
|
|
...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Initializing slices
|
|
|
|
If initializing a slice, provide a capacity where possible to avoid extra
|
|
allocations.
|
|
|
|
**Don't:**
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
var s2 []string
|
|
for _, val := range s1 {
|
|
s2 = append(s2, val)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Do:**
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
s2 := make([]string, 0, len(s1))
|
|
for _, val := range s1 {
|
|
s2 = append(s2, val)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If no capacity is passed to `make` when creating a new slice, `append`
|
|
will continuously resize the slice's backing array if it cannot hold
|
|
the values. Providing the capacity ensures that allocations are kept
|
|
to a minimum. It's recommended that the [`prealloc`](https://github.com/alexkohler/prealloc)
|
|
golanci-lint rule automatically check for this.
|
|
|
|
### Analyzer Tests
|
|
|
|
The conventional Secure [analyzer](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/) has a [`convert` function](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/command/-/blob/main/convert.go#L15-17) that converts SAST/DAST scanner reports into [GitLab Security Reports](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/security-report-schemas). When writing tests for the `convert` function, we should make use of [test fixtures](https://dave.cheney.net/2016/05/10/test-fixtures-in-go) using a `testdata` directory at the root of the analyzer's repository. The `testdata` directory should contain two subdirectories: `expect` and `reports`. The `reports` directory should contain sample SAST/DAST scanner reports which are passed into the `convert` function during the test setup. The `expect` directory should contain the expected GitLab Security Report that the `convert` returns. See Secret Detection for an [example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/secrets/-/blob/160424589ef1eed7b91b59484e019095bc7233bd/convert_test.go#L13-66).
|
|
|
|
If the scanner report is small, less than 35 lines, then feel free to [inline the report](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/sobelow/-/blob/8bd2428a/convert/convert_test.go#L13-77) rather than use a `testdata` directory.
|
|
|
|
#### Test Diffs
|
|
|
|
The [go-cmp](https://github.com/google/go-cmp) package should be used when comparing large structs in tests. It makes it possible to output a specific diff where the two structs differ, rather than seeing the whole of both structs printed out in the test logs. Here is a small example:
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
package main
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type Foo struct {
|
|
Desc Bar
|
|
Point Baz
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type Bar struct {
|
|
A string
|
|
B string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type Baz struct {
|
|
X int
|
|
Y int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHelloWorld(t *testing.T) {
|
|
want := Foo{
|
|
Desc: Bar{A: "a", B: "b"},
|
|
Point: Baz{X: 1, Y: 2},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got := Foo{
|
|
Desc: Bar{A: "a", B: "b"},
|
|
Point: Baz{X: 2, Y: 2},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Log("reflect comparison:")
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("Wrong result. want:\n%v\nGot:\n%v", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Log("cmp comparison:")
|
|
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Wrong result. (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The output demonstrates why `go-cmp` is far superior when comparing large structs. Even though you could spot the difference with this small difference, it quickly gets unwieldy as the data grows.
|
|
|
|
```plaintext
|
|
main_test.go:36: reflect comparison:
|
|
main_test.go:38: Wrong result. want:
|
|
{{a b} {1 2}}
|
|
Got:
|
|
{{a b} {2 2}}
|
|
main_test.go:41: cmp comparison:
|
|
main_test.go:43: Wrong result. (-want +got):
|
|
main.Foo{
|
|
Desc: {A: "a", B: "b"},
|
|
Point: main.Baz{
|
|
- X: 1,
|
|
+ X: 2,
|
|
Y: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[Return to Development documentation](../index.md).
|