From the Go specification:
> "1. For a nil slice, the number of iterations is 0."
https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range
Therefore, an additional nil check for before the loop is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
All selectors had `.ui.items` prefix and I did not find it in any of the
templates or JS, so this is a pretty safe removal.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Related to: #8312#26491
In migration v109, we only added a new column `CanCreateOrgRepo` in Team
table, but not initial the value of it.
This may cause bug like #26491.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. Fine tune the CSS styles, and add more examples
2. Add necessary "dimmer" animation for modal dialogs, otherwise the UI
seems flicking (follow #26469)
## Changes
- no more hardcoded `border-radius`es (apart from `0`)
- no more value inconsistencies
- no more guessing what pixel value you should use
- two new variables:
- `--border-radius-medium` (for elements where the normal border radius
does not suffice)
- `--border-radius-circle` (for displaying circles)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Cargo registry-auth feature requires config.json to have a property
auth-required set to true in order to send token to all registry
requests.
This is ok for git index because you can manually edit the config.json
file to add the auth-required, but when using sparse
(setting index url to
"sparse+https://git.example.com/api/packages/{owner}/cargo/"), the
config.json is dynamically rendered, and does not reflect changes to the
config.json file in the repo.
I see two approaches:
- Serve the real config.json file when fetching the config.json on the
cargo service.
- Automatically detect if the registry requires authorization. (This is
what I implemented in this PR).
What the PR does:
- When a cargo index repository is created, on the config.json, set
auth-required to wether or not the repository is private.
- When the cargo/config.json endpoint is called, set auth-required to
wether or not the request was authorized using an API token.
According to the GitHub API Spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret
Merge the Create and Update secret into a single API.
- Remove the `CreateSecretOption` struct and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateSecretOption` in `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Update the `CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` to use `CreateOrUpdateSecretOption`
instead of `UpdateSecretOption`
- Remove the `CreateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret`
- Update the Swagger documentation in
`routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go` and `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl`
to reflect the changes in the struct names and function names
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Fix some bugs from #25715, fix #25830
1. `$.locale.Tr ... Safe` needs `Escape`, but not `PathEscapeSegments`
2. The attribute should be `role`
3. The `ComposeBranchCompareURL` already does escaping correctly
Fix #26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Adds
[eslint-plugin-vue-scoped-css](https://github.com/future-architect/eslint-plugin-vue-scoped-css)
and fixes discovered issues which are:
- 1 unused selector
- 3 selectors with `.full.height` parent in a `<style scoped>` block so
the rule could not find the parent. Move these into the unscoped block
instead. They worked before and after.
The web context (modules/context.Context) is quite complex, it's
difficult for the callers to initialize correctly.
This PR introduces a `NewWebContext` function, to make sure the web
context have the same behavior for different cases.
Focus the editor when clicking the "Write" tab. Works for both Textarea
and EasyMDE. Does for some reason not work without the
`requestAnimationFrame`.
The "btn-octicon is-loading" was introduced by #21842 , it is only used
by the "Copy Content" button, but the "btn-octicon" selector would
affect too many uncertain elements.
Now there is a general "small-loading-icon" class, so the "btn-octicon
is-loading" could be removed.
1. Use `is-loading` instead of `ui loader`
2. Introduce class name `image-diff-tabs`, instead of searching `gt-hidden`, which is fragile
3. Align the UI elements, see the screenshots.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/580
- Return a `upload_field` to any release API response, which points to
the API URL for uploading new assets.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration testing to verify URL is returned correctly and that
upload endpoint actually works
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Hi,
We'd like to add merge files files to GetCommitFileStatus fucntions so
API returns the list of all the files associated to a merged pull
request commit, like GitHub API does.
The list of affectedFiles for an API commit is fetched from toCommit()
function in routers/api/v1/repo/commits.go, and API was returning no
file in case of a pull request with no conflict, or just files
associated to the confict resolution, but NOT the full list of merged
files.
This would lead to situations where a CI polling a repo for changes
could miss some file changes due to API returning an empty / partial
list in case of such merged pull requests. (Hope this makes sense :) )
NOTE: I'd like to add a unittest in
integrations/api_repo_git_commits_test.go but failed to understand how
to add my own test bare repo so I can make a test on a merged pull
request commit to check for affectedFiles.
Is there a merged pull request in there that I could use maybe?
Could someone please direct me to the relevant ressources with
informations on how to do that please?
Thanks for your time,
Laurent.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Desveaux <desveaux.thomas@gmail.com>
Fixes: #26333.
Previously, this endpoint only updates the `StatusCheckContexts` field
when `EnableStatusCheck==true`, which makes it impossible to clear the
array otherwise.
This patch uses slice `nil`-ness to decide whether to update the list of
checks. The field is ignored when either the client explicitly passes in
a null, or just omits the field from the json ([which causes
`json.Unmarshal` to leave the struct field
unchanged](https://go.dev/play/p/Z2XHOILuB1Q)). I think this is a better
measure of intent than whether the `EnableStatusCheck` flag was set,
because it matches the semantics of other field types.
Also adds a test case. I noticed that [`testAPIEditBranchProtection`
only checks the branch
name](c1c83dbaec/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go (L68))
and no other fields, so I added some extra `GET` calls and specific
checks to make sure the fields are changing properly.
I added those checks the existing integration test; is that the right
place for it?
Replace #22751
1. only support the default branch in the repository setting.
2. autoload schedule data from the schedule table after starting the
service.
3. support specific syntax like `@yearly`, `@monthly`, `@weekly`,
`@daily`, `@hourly`
## How to use
See the [GitHub Actions
document](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#schedule)
for getting more detailed information.
```yaml
on:
schedule:
- cron: '30 5 * * 1,3'
- cron: '30 5 * * 2,4'
jobs:
test_schedule:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Not on Monday or Wednesday
if: github.event.schedule != '30 5 * * 1,3'
run: echo "This step will be skipped on Monday and Wednesday"
- name: Every time
run: echo "This step will always run"
```
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi.Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Now Gitea exposes unhandled promise rejection messages as error message on the UI.
The "comment form" was quite unclear before, so it should be handled more gracefully to avoid such error.
