Although default branch is not offered for deletion in the templates, we need to prevent it both at the router level and in the pre-receive hook.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* routers: make /compare route available to unauthenticated users
Remove some bits of the compare interface if the user isn't signed in.
Notably, they don't need to see the "New Pull Request" button box nor the
hidden form that would fail to submit due to the POST request continuing to
require proper privileges.
Follow-up commits will improve the UI a bit around this, removing some
"Pull Request" verbiage in favor of "Compare."
* ui: home: show "compare" button for unauthenticated users
This change requires pulling in the BaseRepo unconditionally and
recording if the pull request is in-fact not allowed
(.PullRequestCtx.Allowed). If the user isn't allowed to create a pull
request, either because this isn't a fork or same-fork branch PRs aren't
allowed, then we'll name the button "Compare" instead of "Pull Request."
* ui: branch list: use the new Compare language when available
When viewing the branch listing as an unauthenticated user, you'll get
"Pull Request" buttons. use the new "Compare" verbiage instead, which
matches GitHub behavior when you can't issue a pull request from the
branches.
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Make sure that sendmail processes register with the process manager
* Provide a timeout for these (initially of 5 minutes)
* Add configurable value and tie in to documentation
* Tie in to the admin config page.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Now that emojify.js has been removed, get rid of all instances of has-emoji class that was only used for that. Support for rendering shortcodes should remain in all of these places so it should still work the same.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Add control for the rendering of the frontmatter
* Add control to include a TOC
* Add control to set language - allows control of ToC header and CJK glyph choice.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton art27@cantab.net
* consolidate author name across timeline
* Sync with master
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved
mark Conversation is a way to mark a Conversation is stale
or be solved. when it's marked as stale, will be hided like
stale. all Pull Request writer , Offical Reviewers and poster
can add or remove Conversation resolved mark.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix lint
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Add ResolveDoer
* fix ui
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* change IsResolved to an function
Add permission check in UpdateResolveConversation
* Apply suggestions from code review
* change return error for permisson check
* add default message for deleted user
* get issue message from comment
* add migration for ``ResolveDoerID`` column
another change:
* block mark pending review as resolved because it's not necessary
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change button color
* resolve button size
* fix code style
* remove unusefull code
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add missing commit states to PR checks template
* Add separate translation strings for warning and error
* Fix failure status string
* Revert accidental change with whitespace
It is possible for misconfigured protected branches to have required status checks that are not in any of the current statuses: Pending, Success, Error, Failure, or Warning - presumably because the CI has not contacted us as yet.
Fix #10636 by adding case: missing StatusChecks when these are missing
* make sure duplicate token names cannot be used
* add check to api routes too
* add @lunny s suggestion
* fix & don't forget User.ID
* AccessTokenByNameExists() return error too
* unique token for each test
* fix lint
Signed-off-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lanre Adelowo <yo@lanre.wtf>
* add request review feature in pull request
add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add or delet a special type
review . The acton is is similar to Assign , so many code reuse the function and items of
Assignee, but the meaning and result is different.
The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers,
but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have
Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it.
The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain
all writers and watchers.
The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it.
an other change: add ui otify for Assignees.
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* new change
* add placeholder string
* do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also
change icon for review requests to eye
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* ui: add more message on sidebar menus
* add title on the menus
* show some message instead of hide choose bar when have nothing to choose
* add simply filter for each menus
* do same changes in mew_form.tmpl
* remove some unusefull comments in mew_form.tmpl
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* do review suggestions
* add filter message on sidebar filter
* change IsIssueWriter to HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add organization wide labels
Implement organization wide labels similar to organization wide
webhooks. This lets you create individual labels for organizations that can be used
for all repos under that organization (so being able to reuse the same
label across multiple repos).
This makes it possible for small organizations with many repos to use
labels effectively.
Fixes #7406
* Add migration
* remove comments
* fix tests
* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Removed unused translation string
* show org labels in issue search label filter
* Use more clear var name
* rename migration after merge from master
* comment typo
* update migration again after rebase with master
* check for orgID <=0 per guillep2k review
* fmt
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* remove unused code
* Make sure RepoID is 0 when searching orgID per code review
* more changes/code review requests
* More descriptive translation var per code review
* func description/delete comment when issue label deleted instead of hiding it
* remove comment
* only use issues in that repo when calculating number of open issues for org label on repo label page
* Add integration test for IssuesSearch API with labels
* remove unused function
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use subquery in GetLabelIDsInReposByNames
* Fix tests to use correct orgID
* fix more tests
* IssuesSearch api now uses new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition. Add a few more tests as well
* update comment for clarity
* Revert previous code change now that we can use the new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition
* Don't sort repos by date in IssuesSearch API
After much debugging I've found a strange issue where in some cases MySQL will return a different result than other enigines if a query is sorted by a null collumn. For example with our integration test data where we don't set updated_unix in repository fixtures:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 45
Returns different results for MySQL than other engines. However, the similar query:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 30
Returns the same results.
This causes integration tests to fail on MySQL in certain cases but would never show up in a real installation. Since this API call always returns issues based on the optionally provided repo_priority_id or the issueID itself, there is no change to results by changing the repo sorting method used to get ids earlier in the function.
* linter is back!
* code review
* remove now unused option
* Fix newline at end of files
* more unused code
* update to master
* check for matching ids before query
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Update models/issue_label.go
* update comments
* Update routers/org/setting.go
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
