There's a lot of work that has been done on `.dockerignore`:
- #329
- #2927
- #8338
And finally, it has been deleted by #2927.
This is a copy of the `.gitignore`.
Creating a soft link is more elegant, but it may cause trouble to the Windows users.
Attempt clarify the AppWorkPath in the documentation by using different
notation and adding a section to the start of the cheat sheet.
Fix #21523
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21733
Uncaught Error: Language id "vs.editor.nullLanguage" is not configured
nor known
Note that this monaco-editor worked fine on 0.33.0 and broke on 0.34.0.
If upstream fixed, remove this code.
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Related:
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21596#issuecomment-1291450224
There was a bug when switching language by AJAX: the irrelevant POST
requests were processed by the target page's handler.
Now, use GET instead of POST. The GET requests should be harmless.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Related #20471
This PR adds global quota limits for the package registry. Settings for
individual users/orgs can be added in a seperate PR using the settings
table.
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This addresses #21707 and adds a second package test case for a
non-semver compatible version (this might be overkill though since you
could also edit the old package version to have an epoch in front and
see the error, this just seemed more flexible for the future).
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21640
Before: Gitea can create users like ".xxx" or "x..y", which is not
ideal, it's already a consensus that dot filenames have special
meanings, and `a..b` is a confusing name when doing cross repo compare.
After: stricter
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21666
Caused by https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19663
Before: when install, the INTERNAL_TOKEN was always generated and saved.
But the internal token may be already there by INTERNAL_TOKEN_URI
After: INTERNAL_TOKEN_URI file must be non-empty. When install, skip
internal token generation if the token exists.
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_
## Context
In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:
- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)
## Proposed solution
Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).
This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.
As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):
The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.
## Questions
- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~
## Done as well:
- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there
_Closes #19872_
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
I found myself wondering whether a PR I scheduled for automerge was
actually merged. It was, but I didn't receive a mail notification for it
- that makes sense considering I am the doer and usually don't want to
receive such notifications. But ideally I want to receive a notification
when a PR was merged because I scheduled it for automerge.
This PR implements exactly that.
The implementation works, but I wonder if there's a way to avoid passing
the "This PR was automerged" state down so much. I tried solving this
via the database (checking if there's an automerge scheduled for this PR
when sending the notification) but that did not work reliably, probably
because sending the notification happens async and the entry might have
already been deleted. My implementation might be the most
straightforward but maybe not the most elegant.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Since OpenSSH 7.0 and greater similarly disable the ssh-dss (DSA) public
key algorithm, and recommend against its use.
http://www.openssh.com/legacy.html
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
This patch will remove DSA host key form OpenSSH daemon configuration
file.
Signed-off-by: baronbunny <its@baronbunny.cn>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
GitHub allows releases with target commitish `refs/heads/BRANCH`, which
then causes issues in Gitea after migration. This fix handles cases that
a branch already has a prefix.
Fixes #20317
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
A bug was introduced in #17865 where filepath.Join is used to join
putative unadopted repository owner and names together. This is
incorrect as these names are then used as repository names - which shoud
have the '/' separator. This means that adoption will not work on
Windows servers.
Fix #21632
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
This patch:
- Rename some files( `.md` to `.en-us.md`), fix missed translation copy
- Update link which shoud be refer to `../hacking-on-gitea/` instead of
`../make/` (outdated)
- Update `_redirects`:
- redirect `/{zh-cn|fr-fr}/make/` to `../hacking-on-gitea/`
- redirect `/zh-cn/third-party-tools/` to `/zh-cn/integrations/`
- Delete duplicated/outdated files.
- Update menu `weight` of developers.zh-cn.md
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Browsers introduce a opaque background on iframes if the iframe
element's color-scheme does not match the document's color scheme which
in case of a dark theme results in a mismatch and the browser adds a
white background. Avoid this by specifying the same color scheme outside
and inside the iframe.
See https://fvsch.com/transparent-iframes for more info.
My initial attempt was to make the iframe document the same color-scheme
as the parent page (light or dark) but with that, there was a ugly
background flash on load in Chrome because Chrome apparently always
loads iframe in light scheme initially. Firefox still shows a background
flash on load but this is not possible to get rid of and it's certainly
a browser bug.
Before:
<img width="1147" alt="Screen Shot 2022-10-31 at 13 30 55"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/199017132-9828aace-bdd0-4ede-8118-359e72bcf2fe.png">
After:
<img width="1152" alt="Screen Shot 2022-10-31 at 13 30 36"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/199017137-989a9e67-3fe0-445f-a191-df5bf290dabf.png">
A patch to #17335.
Just like AppPath, Gitea writes its own CustomConf into git hook scripts
too. If Gitea's CustomConf changes, then the git push may fail.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
This patch provide a mechanism to disable
[sitemap](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18407).
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Follow-up to #21352: when testing this out, I found out that the syntax
for the `symbolic-ref` command was different than originally assumed in
that PR. Never got around to submitting a PR until now.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
