The changes for "commit-body" in #26877 are not ideal.
The reason is: the "commit-body" is usually a `<pre>`, it has default
margins. In most cases, we do not need that large margin. So, this PR
introduces a general but small margin for all "commit-body" elements.
Then these `gt-m-0` could be removed.
The `:not` selector is not needed, because the `.timeline-item` selector
is already clear enough.
This change was caused by #26271, for configuration as below:
```
[attachment]
ENABLE = true
PATH = data/attachments
MAX_SIZE = 100
MAX_FILES = 5
```
Before #26271, the resolved path is ${AppWorkPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/attachments`)
After #26271, the resolved path is ${AppDataPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/data/attachments`)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26864
Follow https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26271
1. The `og:description` should be "a one to two sentence description of
your object"
* It shouldn't output all the user inputted content -- it would be
pretty huge.
* Maybe it only needs at most 300 bytes.
2. Do not render commit message as HTML
The [recommended order](https://vuejs.org/guide/scaling-up/sfc.html) for
SFC blocks is script -> template -> style, which we were violating
because template and script were swapped. I do find script first also
easier to read because the imports are on top, letting me immideatly see
a component's dependencies.
This is a pure cut-paste refactor with some removal of some empty lines.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Add more useful Open Graph metadata for commit and file URLs:
- Set `og:title` to the page title, which is a concise summary in both
cases (`<commit message> · <commit hash>` and `<filename> at <branch>`,
respectively)
- Set `og:description` to the commit message body, if available
- Set `og:url` to the relevant URLs instead of the repo URL
Also move the relevant meta tags into a separate template as they now
take up the majority of the base head template.
## Changes
- Forces flashed error to render immediately when forgot password code
is incorrect or has expired.
- Adds a link back to the `forgot_password` page so that the user can
restart the process (in the event that their link has expired)
Fixes #24944
Since a user with write permissions for issues can add attachments to an
issue via the the web interface, the user should also be able to add
attachments via the API
Now that we have the `/assets` directory, we can put`licenses.txt`
directly into it instead of incorrect `/js` path which was previously
only done to avoid reserving a username.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Previously, only some of these regex had the `i` flag and while we can
likely ensure case for our files, these regexes are also used for
third-party files, so it's better to always match insensitively.
- While doing some sanity checks over OpenSSH's code for how they handle
certificates authentication. I stumbled on an condition that checks the
certificate type is really an user certificate on the server-side
authentication. This checks seems to be a formality and just for the
sake of good domain seperation, because an user and host certificate
don't differ in their generation, verification or flags that can be
included.
- Add this check to the builtin SSH server to stay close to the
unwritten SSH specification.
- This is an breaking change for setups where the builtin SSH server is
being used and for some reason host certificates were being used for
authentication.
-
(cherry picked from commit de35b141b79a3d6efe2127ed2c73fd481515e481)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1172
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
Like OpenSSH, the built-in SSH server will now only accept SSH user
certificates, not server certificates.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Modify the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function in `api.go` to include a
`Delete` operation for the secret
- Modify the `DeleteOrgSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the organization
- Modify the `DeleteSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the repository
- Modify the `v1_json.tmpl` template file to update the `operationId`
and `summary` for the `deleteSecret` operation in both the organization
and repository sections
---------
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
1. The old `prepareQueryArg` did double-unescaping of form value.
2. By the way, remove the unnecessary `ctx.Flash = ...` in
`MockContext`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Just like `models/unittest`, the testing helper functions should be in a
separate package: `contexttest`
And complete the TODO:
> // TODO: move this function to other packages, because it depends on
"models" package
You can currently visit `{repo}/issues/new` and create a blank issue,
even if it's disabled. This PR fixes this,
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1356
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
This PR implements a proposal to clean up the admin users table by
moving some information out to a separate user details page (which also
displays some additional information).
Other changes:
- move edit user page from `/admin/users/{id}` to
`/admin/users/{id}/edit` -> `/admin/users/{id}` now shows the user
details page
- show if user is instance administrator as a label instead of a
separate column
- separate explore users template into a page- and a shared one, to make
it possible to use it on the user details page
- fix issue where there was no margin between alert message and
following content on admin pages
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
</details>
Partially resolves #25939
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Backtick syntax now works in repo description too. Also, I replaced the
CSS for this was a new single class, making it more flexible and not
dependent on a parent. Also, very slightly reduced font size from 16.8px
to 16px.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Corollary to #26775:
All selectors I found that are actually used and not necessarily present
in the current code have been copied to `web_src/css/base.css`.
Everything else should be a clean removal.
> ### Description
> If a new branch is pushed, and the repository has a rule that would
require signed commits for the new branch, the commit is rejected with a
500 error regardless of whether it's signed.
>
> When pushing a new branch, the "old" commit is the empty ID
(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000). verifyCommits has no
provision for this and passes an invalid commit range to git rev-list.
Prior to 1.19 this wasn't an issue because only pre-existing individual
branches could be protected.
>
> I was able to reproduce with
[try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test](https://try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test),
which is set up with a blanket rule to require commits on all branches.
Fix #25565
Very thanks to @Craig-Holmquist-NTI for reporting the bug and suggesting
an valid solution!
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Compare those `Uint8Array` via conversion to Array which are properly
comparable, so that we don't have to worry about whether `TextEncoder`
and `UInt8Array` from the environment are compatible or not.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
