- The dropdowns that contain filters for issues and pull requests are
currently not styled with the `small` class, which causes a smaller font
size to be set. Remove it for the `Sort` filter to make it consistent
and make it _more_ readable.
- Resolves #2914
Resolves #29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
We have to define this one in helpers.css because tailwind only
generates a single class but certain things rely on this being
double-class. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-hidden#tw-hidden#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* web_src/css/**/*
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ec3d467f15a683b305ac165c3eba6683628dcb25)
Conflicts:
templates/install.tmpl
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_title.tmpl
resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the
commands to all files
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves #65
These should be all simple inline styles that were left in the
templates.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 0bef9a2775af0e27a0754207fc87537b96c2792e)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945.
There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I
just ran below command and reverted that one instance.
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
```
(cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to
ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
In HTML, `?key=val` already means "use the current link with new query parameters"
(cherry picked from commit 4c476fa41dc29dc24afda0925023ae3d0b9707cd)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/shared/issuelist.tmpl
trivial context conflict because the lines in Forgejo have rel=nofollow
Used all existing css vars, other migrations are 1:1.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 34290a00c4501ffeba26db267be71ab68e3ec97f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
trivial context conflicts
The previous (cherry picked) commit changed a translation key, from
`repo.pulls.no_results` to `common.no_results_found`. This would break
existing translations, and will have to be handled differently, if at
all.
This changes the affected code to continue using the old key.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Add `form-fetch-action` to indicate that this form POST to an link
that returns JSON and thus should be handled by Javascript code.
- Found by @fnetx
- Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1793
Tested a few things, all working fine. Not sure if the chinese machine
translation is good.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c1c5ba18e1ac8861f429b825163b8210fd178)
Conflicts:
docs/content/contributing/guidelines-frontend.zh-cn.md
Gitea docs
Replace 18 `gt-` prefixes with `tw-` with perl replacement. I manually
checked them all with `rg` afterwards.
(cherry picked from commit a2e90014ec20a1085449a66061389cfe0d12260f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/header.tmpl
because some of the header moved to header_fork.tmpl
Add new option:
`visible`: witch can hide a specific field of the form or the created
content afterwards
It is a string array witch can contain `form` and `content`. If only
`form` is present, it wont show up in the created issue afterwards and
the other way around. By default it sets both except for markdown
As they are optional and github don't have any similar thing, it is non
breaking and also do not conflict with it.
With this you can:
- define "post issue creation" elements like a TODO list to track an
issue state
- make sure to have a checkbox that reminds the user to check for a
thing but dont have it in the created issue afterwards
- define markdown for the created issue (was the downside of using yaml
instead of md in the past)
- ...
## Demo
```yaml
name: New Contribution
description: External Contributor creating a pull
body:
- type: checkboxes
id: extern-todo
visible: [form]
attributes:
label: Contribution Guidelines
options:
- label: I checked there exist no similar feature to be extended
required: true
- label: I did read the CONTRIBUTION.MD
required: true
- type: checkboxes
id: intern-todo
visible: [content]
attributes:
label: Maintainer Check-List
options:
- label: Does this pull follow the KISS principe
- label: Checked if internal bord was notifyed
# ....
```
[Demo
Video](https://cloud.obermui.de/s/tm34fSAbJp9qw9z/download/vid-20240220-152751.mkv)
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit 77e29e0c39392f142627303bd798fb55258072b2)
The value passed into "attachments" sub-template is from
"RedneredContent", so use the same name for consistent. And it makes
readers easy to know its data type.
(cherry picked from commit b8a598e6a43fa65db23b88d3b3b281b5f2f7c2e0)
Str2html was abused a lot. So use a proper name for it: SanitizeHTML
And add some tests to show its behavior.
(cherry picked from commit fb42972c057364a1dc99dfb528554e7a94415be7)
Conflicts:
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.en-us.md
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.zh-cn.md
prefer their version always
This PR touches the most interesting part of the "template refactoring".
1. Unclear variable type. Especially for "web/feed/convert.go":
sometimes it uses text, sometimes it uses HTML.
2. Assign text content to "RenderedContent" field, for example: `
project.RenderedContent = project.Description` in web/org/projects.go
3. Assign rendered content to text field, for example: `r.Note =
rendered content` in web/repo/release.go
4. (possible) Incorrectly calling `{{Str2html
.PackageDescriptor.Metadata.ReleaseNotes}}` in
package/content/nuget.tmpl, I guess the name Str2html misleads
developers to use it to "render string to html", but it only sanitizes.
if ReleaseNotes really contains HTML, then this is not a problem.
(cherry picked from commit e71eb8930a5d0f60874b038c223498b41ad65592)
Conflicts:
modules/templates/util_string.go
trivial context conflict
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
(cherry picked from commit 17f170ee3724d8bdf2ddaad4211b12433f78ff0e)
Continuation of #2444, which introduced the commit
bf7fb89178 but only added
the label and the tests.
The tooltip explaining what AGit is and its advantages is not
meant to advertise AGit - it is meant to inform the reader that
is presumably not familiar with the workflow that they will not
be able to find a fork or a branch associated with the Pull Request
as a direct consequence of this workflow.
Issue #2474 mentions that we should show instructions on how to
fetch an AGit-created Pull Request, and this is the plan. However,
this may take time, so I might as well make the label a bit more
"complete" and less out-of-place for now if we do not manage to
improve these instructions until the next release (Forgejo v1.22).
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2474
