Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30428
---
Conflict resolution: trivial and move test to own subtest run directly
after `Normal`.
(cherrypicked commit 9466fec879f4f2c88c7c1e7a5cffba319282ab66)
Related to #2773
Related to Refactor URL detection [gitea#29960](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29960)
Related to Refactor external URL detection [gitea#29973](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29973)
I added a bunch of tests to `httplib.TestIsRiskyRedirectURL` and some cases should be better handled (however it is not an easy task).
I also ported the removal of `utils.IsExternalURL`, since it prevents duplicated (subtle) code.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3167
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
The user that caused the notification to re-evaluates the
schedules is not the one that will trigger the workflows. They are
background tasks that are authored by the action user (id -2).
Such a mis-assignment is problematic when the user that caused the
notification is deleted.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3211
This PR fixes the possible ambiguity of rendered inline permalinks across repos by adding it as a suffix to the title element if the permalink refers to a file not inside the current repository. Closes #2965
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3042
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
When visiting a repos `/settings/units` page, highlight the active tab
properly: "Add more..." if the tab is displayed, or "Settings"
otherwise.
Fixes #3188.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- The parser of `git grep`'s output uses `bufio.Scanner`, which is a good
choice overall, however it does have a limit that's usually not noticed,
it will not read more than `64 * 1024` bytes at once which can be hit in
practical scenarios.
- Use `bufio.Reader` instead which doesn't have this limitation, but is
a bit harder to work with as it's a more lower level primitive.
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3149
- The code that gets contributor stats tried to store an
`map[string]*ContributorData` type in the cache, this works for the
memory cache but not for other caches such as Redis.
- The cache implementation for Redis would convert this map via
`fmt.Sprintf` to an string, which would simply print the pointer and not
the value of the pointer. Storing pointers is a no-go as this will get
GC-ed eventually within a few minutes. Therefore store everything with
json, that does properly store the value of the pointers.
- Adds unit test that verifies JSON is being used.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3158
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* A Created field is added to the Issue table
* The Created field is set to the time (with nano resolution) on creation
* Record the nano time repo_module.PushUpdateOptions is created by the hook
* The decision to update a pull request created before a commit was
pushed is based on the time (with nano resolution) the git hook
was run and the Created field
It ensures the following happens:
* commit C is pushed
* the git hook queues AddTestPullRequestTask for processing and returns with success
* TestPullRequest is not called yet
* a pull request P with commit C as the head is created
* TestPullRequest runs and ignores P because it was created after the commit was received
When the "created" column is NULL, no verification is done, pull
requests that were created before the column was created in the
database cannot be newer than the latest call to a git hook.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
It is used in the CI to verify the S3 backend works. It has no
security or feature requirements and upgrading would only be required
when a major version is published, which cannot be deduced from the
version number.
Making that upgrade available from the dashboard and dealt with when
and if it gets the attention of a developer, even if once a year, is
good enough.
