This makes signed tags show a badge in the tag list similar to signed
commits in the commit list, and a more verbose block when viewing a
single tag. Works for both GPG and SSH signed tags.
Fixes #1316.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
It was necessary in the debug period to help with a faster debug
loop. Now that it works reliably, there is no need for renovate
updates more than once a day.
It will still possible to force a run, should it be necessary, by
re-running the last scheduled job.
This is, in large part, a refactoring: we rename `CommitVerification` to
`ObjectVerification`, and adjust `ParseObjectWithSignature` (previously
`ParseCommitWithSignature`) to work on an object, rather than a commit.
This in turn, lets us implement `ParseTagWithSignature` on top of it, so
commit & tag signature verification will share most of the code.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Colordots are generated for colors in inline code, such as `red`,
`rgb(255, 0, 124)`, `#ffaabb` and `hsl(124, 52%, 50%)`. However this
shouldn't be doon for literal color names as these can be too common
assiocated with non-color related stuff _and matches the behavior of
some other forge_.
- Move the regexes from bluemonday to Forgejo and do the checking
ourselves.
- Adds unit tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1510
The intention was good initially but the expression was wrong for two
reasons:
* When a pull_request event is received for a labeled action, the
match should be github.event.action == 'label_updated' and not
'labeled'
* The event does not have a github.event.label field and
contains(github.event.label.name, 'backport/v') will always be
false.
Since the expression is only evaluated in the context of a merged pull
request, either because it was just closed or because it was labeled
after the fact, the only verification that is needed is to assert that
there is at least one `backport/v*` label.
- Currently emojis that are part of the label's name aren't rendered
when shown in the popup that you get when you hover over issue
references.
- This patch fixes that by rendering the emoji.
- Adds CSS to not make the emoji big in the label.
- Resolves #1531
strategy: ort
The strategy is changed from "recursive" to "ort", which is the
default for git >= 2.43.2 and claims to reduce the likelyhood of
conflicts according to man git-merge:
> This has been reported to result in fewer merge conflicts without
> causing mismerges...
strategy-option: find-renames
The default option are the same for both strategies and "theirs" will:
> This option forces conflicting hunks to be auto-resolved
> cleanly by favoring their version.
"their" being whatever is not in the commits being cherry-picked.
In the context of Forgejo backports, this is not what is desired:
whenever a conflict happens it needs to be manually resolved and
prefering whatever is in the stable branch will not lead to a sane
backport.
It is changed back to "find-renames" which is documented to be the
default:
> Turn on rename detection, optionally setting the similarity
> threshold. This is the default.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2886
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the form and it works as before
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a8748eedae3518550bd43fd592d206df2bea6bef)
Conflicts:
web_src/js/features/admin/users.js
prefer Gitea version and discard jQuery specific fixes from
Forbid jQuery `.prop` and fix related issues (#29832)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29874#discussion_r1542227686
- The migration of v292 will miss many projects. These projects will
have no default board. This PR introduced a new migration number and
removed v292 migration.
- This PR also added the missed transactions on project-related
operations.
- Only `SetDefaultBoard` will remove duplicated defaults but not in
`GetDefaultBoard`
(cherry picked from commit 40cdc84b368cce8328b4b49ea5ecf1c5fa040300)
Resolves #29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
