This PR fixes two problems. One is when filter repository issues, only
repository level projects are listed. Another is if you list open
issues, only open projects will be displayed in filter options and if
you list closed issues, only closed projects will be displayed in filter
options.
In this PR, both repository level and org/user level projects will be
displayed in filter, and both open and closed projects will be listed as
filter items.
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Every user can already disable the filter manually, so the explicit
setting is absolutely useless and only complicates the logic.
Previously, there was also unexpected behavior when multiple query
parameters were present.
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.
A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.
Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.
code by: @brechtvl
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)
## Review without space diff
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1
## Purpose of this PR
1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command
## The main idea of this PR
* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
* Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
* After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
* -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`
## FAQ
### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?
#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.
Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.
### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`
According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.
### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?
Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.
And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.
### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?
Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.
### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?
At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.
### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?
Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.
This PR:
* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.
Ref #22578
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Fix #21994.
And fix #19470.
While generating new repo from a template, it does something like
"commit to git repo, re-fetch repo model from DB, and update default
branch if it's empty".
19d5b2f922/modules/repository/generate.go (L241-L253)
Unfortunately, when load repo from DB, the default branch will be set to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` if it's empty:
19d5b2f922/models/repo/repo.go (L228-L233)
I believe it's a very old temporary patch but has been kept for many
years, see:
[2d2d85bb](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/2d2d85bb#diff-1851799b06733db4df3ec74385c1e8850ee5aedee70b8b55366910d22725eea8)
I know it's a risk to delete it, may lead to potential behavioral
changes, but we cannot keep the outdated `FIXME` forever. On the other
hand, an empty `DefaultBranch` does make sense: an empty repo doesn't
have one conceptually (actually, Gitea will still set it to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` to make it safer).
The error reported when a user passes a private ssh key as their ssh
public key is not very nice.
This PR improves this slightly.
Ref #22693
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
caused by #22680
`pushPayload.Ref` and `prPayload.PullRequest.Base.Ref` have the format
like `refs/heads/<branch_name>`, so we need to trim the prefix before
comparing.
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.
- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic
Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Same to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22674 and
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22605
Sorry to create 3 PR to fix this.
I checked all span with class `org-visibility`, i think this is the last
one :)
And I found that private/limited user has no private/limited tag in
dashboard. but org does.
If it is ok i will add this feature in another pr.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Followup for #20908 to allow setting the scopes when creating new access
token via CLI.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
The `no-store` cache control added in #20432 is causing form input to be
cleared unnecessarily on page reload. Instead use
`max-age=0,private,must-revalidate` which avoids this.
This was particularly a problem when typing a long comment for an issue
and then for example changing the label. The page would be reloaded and
lose the unsubmitted comment.
Fixes #22603
Fixes #22183
Replaces #22187
This PR adds secrets for users. I refactored the files for organizations
and repos to use the same logic and templates. I splitted the secrets
from deploy keys again and reverted the fix from #22187.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This PR fixes two bugs with Webauthn support:
* There was a longstanding bug within webauthn due to the backend using
URLEncodedBase64 but the javascript using decoding using plain base64.
This causes intermittent issues with users reporting decoding errors.
* Following the recent upgrade to webauthn there was a change in the way
the library expects RPOrigins to be configured. This leads to the
Relying Party Origin not being configured and prevents registration.
Fix #22507
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
EDIT: The main change of this PR was resolved by #22599. This
complements that PR for some cases without label and complicated layout
to be added.
NOTE: Contributed by @Forgejo.
There was a mistake when choosing the structure for the repo avatars parent folder and it added a spurious /gitea.
The `data` directory should contain folders like:
- `attachments/`
- `avatars/`
- `log/`
- `repo-avatars/`
This PR provides a contributed backport command to help create backports
for Gitea.
It represents a significant improvement on my previously described
shell-script.
It can be installed using `go install contrib/backport/backport.go`.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Disable this test for the moment because the used imap container image
seems unstable which results in many failed CI builds.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
The use of ui colors (red, green, etc) should be limited to actionable
or dismissable entries. Before this commit, a green/red label was used
to display issues count on each repository. This did not add any
meaningful information to the list.
Removing the label reduces ambiguity and makes the list easier to scan
visually.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
