- If a `logout` event is send the user should be redirected to the
homepage, there are three mechanism that can do this. The response of
`/user/logout` and the event listener of notifications or stopwatch.
It's essentially a race for what's processed first to determine which
mechanism takes care of redirecting the user.
- Fix that the redirection mechanism of the notification and stopwatch
event listener redirects to an absolute URL.
- Ref: #2135
- If a user tries to create another protected branching rule that
specifies a set of branches already used by another rule, do not allow
it.
- Update the translation accordingly.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves #2455
The release number displayed by the API and the CLI becomes:
7.0.0+1.22.0
instead of
1.22.0
It would otherwise be inconsistent to have different version number depending on the interface. With the current implementation `/api/forgejo/v1/version` would return `7.0.0+1.22.0` while `/api/v1/version` would return `1.22.0`. The release would be announced as `7.0.0+1.22.0` but the web API would display `1.22.0`.
It may cause some tools that are Gitea specific to not behave as they should in the future if they expect a Gitea version number and activate some features depending on what it is. They would need to be patched to strip the leading Forgejo version number before asserting the Gitea version.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2425
For small, personal self-hosted instances with no user signups, the fork
button is just a noise. This patch allows disabling them like stars can
be disabled too.
Disabling forks does not only remove the buttons from the web UI, it
also disables the routes that could be used to create forks.
Fixes #2441.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
As suggested by @Gusted in #2431, move the permission checking from
`ArtifactsDeleteView` into the route instead, where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Split prepareWorkPathAndCustomConf out of the actions sub-command.
In the CLI prepareWorkPathAndCustomConf is a preparation step that is
needed before running the sub-command actions in the Forgejo CLI. It
is currently specific to this sub-command but it will be useful for
other sub-commands such as F3.
The test suite was broken e.g. on Debian 12 due to requiring a very
recent version of Git installed on the system. This commit skips SHA256
tests in the git module, if a Git version older than 2.42 or gogit is used.
- Check if someone is (accidentally) trying to create a pull request via
AGit with changes already in the target branch and fail if that is the
case.
- Added integration test.
Adds a label to Pull Requests that were created using AGit-Flow,
in order to prevent situations where a contributor uses AGit-Flow
to push new changes - only to realize that they did not use AGit-Flow
in the first place, and that they just opened a new PR accidentally
(that was me).
Also intended to raise general awareness about the feature. Some
additional work, such as adding a tooltip, still needs to be
done.
A small typo fix for a comment and (exclusively) formatting fixes
in the copyright header are also included.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2433
- The form used by the diff patch operation requires that the value of
`tree_path` is set, even though it's not used. Set it to `patch` so this
feature can be used again.
- Regression of 08fe6f8c7e.
Also ignore the *-test tags when figuring out the Forgejo version,
they exist in the integration repository and experimental repository
for daily releases.
- The ambiguous character detection is an important security feature to
combat against sourcebase attacks (https://trojansource.codes/).
- However there are a few problems with the feature as it stands
today (i) it's apparantly an big performance hitter, it's twice as slow
as syntax highlighting (ii) it contains false positives, because it's
reporting valid problems but not valid within the context of a
programming language (ambiguous charachters in code comments being a
prime example) that can lead to security issues (iii) charachters from
certain languages always being marked as ambiguous. It's a lot of effort
to fix the aforementioned issues.
- Therefore, make it configurable in which context the ambiguous
character detection should be run, this avoids running detection in all
contexts such as file views, but still enable it in commits and pull
requests diffs where it matters the most. Ideally this also becomes an
per-repository setting, but the code architecture doesn't allow for a
clean implementation of that.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration tests to ensure that the contexts and instance-wide
is respected (and that ambigious charachter detection actually work in
different places).
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2395#issuecomment-1575547
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/564
Adds a very bare-bones test for artifact deletion. It does not exercise
the functionality itself, just the presence of the functionality.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27172#discussion_r1493735466
When cleanup artifacts, it removes storage first. If storage is not
exist (maybe delete manually), it gets error and continue loop. It makes
a dead loop if there are a lot pending but non-existing artifacts.
Now it updates db record at first to avoid keep a lot of pending status
artifacts.
- Instead of relying on JSON to convert the struct to map, use
`reflect` to do this conversion. Also simplify it a bit by only passing
one variable to the template.
- This avoids issues where the conversion to JSON causes changes in
the value, for example huge numbers are converted to its scientific
notation but are consequently not converted back when being displayed.
- Adds unit tests.
- Resolves an issue where the amount of comments is being displayed in
scientific notation on Codeberg.
It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
On the wiki and revisions page, information is shown about the last
commit that modified that wiki page. This includes the time it was last
edited and by whom. Verify it is sanitized.
