Commit graph

1184 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lunny Xiao
0fd1672ae4
For API attachments, use API URL (#25639)
Fix #25257

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-10 09:31:19 +00:00
silverwind
887a683af9
Update tool dependencies, lock govulncheck and actionlint (#25655)
- Update all tool dependencies
- Lock `govulncheck` and `actionlint` to their latest tags

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-07-09 11:58:06 +00:00
KN4CK3R
115f40e433
Test if container blob is accessible before mounting (#22759)
related #16865

This PR adds an accessibility check before mounting container blobs.

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-07-09 11:24:43 +00:00
Zettat123
a42a838843
Fix ref for workflows triggered by pull_request_target (#25743)
Follow #25229

At present, when the trigger event is `pull_request_target`, the `ref`
and `sha` of `ActionRun` are set according to the base branch of the
pull request. This makes it impossible for us to find the head branch of
the `ActionRun` directly. In this PR, the `ref` and `sha` will always be
set to the head branch and they will be changed to the base branch when
generating the task context.
2023-07-07 19:22:03 +00:00
techknowlogick
cb01b8691d
Add open/closed field support for issue index (#25708)
A couple of notes:
* Future changes should refactor arguments into a struct
* This filtering only is supported by meilisearch right now
* Issue index number is bumped which will cause a re-index
2023-07-07 17:10:13 +00:00
6543
8995046110
Less naked returns (#25713)
just a step towards  #25655

and some related refactoring
2023-07-07 05:31:56 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
KN4CK3R
c890454769
Add direct serving of package content (#25543)
Fixes #24723

Direct serving of content aka HTTP redirect is not mentioned in any of
the package registry specs but lots of official registries do that so it
should be supported by the usual clients.
2023-07-03 15:33:28 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
de981c39e6
Fix bug of branches API with tests (#25578)
Fix #25558
Extract from #22743

This PR added a repository's check when creating/deleting branches via
API. Mirror repository and archive repository cannot do that.
2023-07-01 10:52:52 +08:00
Jason Song
67bd9d4f1e
Restrict [actions].DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL to only github or self (#25581)
Resolve #24789

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

Before this, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` cound be set to any custom URLs like
`https://gitea.com` or `http://your-git-server,https://gitea.com`, and
the default value was `https://gitea.com`.

But now, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` supports only
`github`(`https://github.com`) or `self`(the root url of current Gitea
instance), and the default value is `github`.

If it has configured with a URL, an error log will be displayed and it
will fallback to `github`.

Actually, what we really want to do is always make it
`https://github.com`, however, this may not be acceptable for some
instances of internal use, so there's extra support for `self`, but no
more, even `https://gitea.com`.

Please note that `uses: https://xxx/yyy/zzz` always works and it does
exactly what it is supposed to do.

Although it's breaking, I belive it should be backported to `v1.20` due
to some security issues.

Follow-up on the runner side:

- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/262
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/70
2023-06-30 07:26:36 +00:00
JakobDev
254a82842a
Add API for changing Avatars (#25369)
This adds an API for uploading and Deleting Avatars for of Users, Repos
and Organisations. I'm not sure, if this should also be added to the
Admin API.

Resolves #25344

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-29 23:22:55 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
6e19484f4d
Sync branches into databases (#22743)
Related #14180
Related #25233 
Related #22639
Close #19786
Related #12763 

This PR will change all the branches retrieve method from reading git
data to read database to reduce git read operations.

- [x] Sync git branches information into database when push git data
- [x] Create a new table `Branch`, merge some columns of `DeletedBranch`
into `Branch` table and drop the table `DeletedBranch`.
- [x] Read `Branch` table when visit `code` -> `branch` page
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list branch names in `code` page dropdown
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list git ref compare page
- [x] Provide a button in admin page to manually sync all branches.
- [x] Sync branches if repository is not empty but database branches are
empty when visiting pages with branches list
- [x] Use `commit_time desc` as the default FindBranch order by to keep
consistent as before and deleted branches will be always at the end.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-06-29 10:03:20 +00:00
Georg Dangl
9538842364
Use correct response code in push mirror creation response in v1_json.tmpl (#25476)
In the process of doing a bit of automation via the API, we've
discovered a _small_ issue in the Swagger definition. We tried to create
a push mirror for a repository, but our generated client raised an
exception due to an unexpected status code.

When looking at this function:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L236-L240)

We see it defines `201 - Created` as response:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L260-L262)

But it actually returns `200 - OK`:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L373)

So I've just updated the Swagger definitions to match the code😀

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-28 22:00:19 +00:00
Zettat123
defd807073
Fix bugs related to notification endpoints (#25548) 2023-06-28 10:26:56 -04:00
Zettat123
48e5a74f21
Support pull_request_target event (#25229)
Fix #25088

This PR adds the support for
[`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target)
workflow trigger. `pull_request_target` is similar to `pull_request`,
but the workflow triggered by the `pull_request_target` event runs in
the context of the base branch of the pull request rather than the head
branch. Since the workflow from the base is considered trusted, it can
access the secrets and doesn't need approvals to run.
2023-06-26 14:33:18 +08:00
Jason Song
174213530d
Fix Permission in API returned repository struct (#25388)
The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.

Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)

---

Review tips:

The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101

And other changes are passive.
2023-06-22 13:08:08 +00:00
sillyguodong
35a653d7ed
Support configuration variables on Gitea Actions (#24724)
Co-Author: @silverwind @wxiaoguang 
Replace: #24404

See:
- [defining configuration variables for multiple
workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows)
- [vars
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#vars-context)

Related to:
- [x] protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/7
- [x] act_runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/157
- [x] act: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/43

#### Screenshoot
Create Variable:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758288-032b7f64-44e7-48ea-b07d-de8b8b0e3729.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758174-5203f64c-1d0e-4737-a5b0-62061dee86f8.png)

Workflow:
```yaml
  test_vars:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Print Custom Variables
        run: echo "${{ vars.test_key }}"
      - name: Try to print a non-exist var
        run: echo "${{ vars.NON_EXIST_VAR }}"
```

Actions Log:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236759075-af0c5950-368d-4758-a8ac-47a96e43b6e2.png)

---
This PR just implement the org / user (depends on the owner of the
current repository) and repo level variables, The Environment level
variables have not been implemented.
Because
[Environment](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/deployment/targeting-different-environments/using-environments-for-deployment#about-environments)
is a module separate from `Actions`. Maybe it would be better to create
a new PR to do it.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-20 22:54:15 +00:00
Daniel Wolf
bd2e3226be
Fix incorrect actions ref_name (#25358)
Fix #25357 .

Just a simple fix the result of `${{ gitea.ref_name }}` to show the
shortened name rather than the full ref.
2023-06-19 17:32:09 +08:00
wxiaoguang
4e2f1ee58d
Refactor web package and context package (#25298)
1. The "web" package shouldn't depends on "modules/context" package,
instead, let each "web context" register themselves to the "web"
package.
2. The old Init/Free doesn't make sense, so simplify it
* The ctx in "Init(ctx)" is never used, and shouldn't be used that way
* The "Free" is never called and shouldn't be called because the SSPI
instance is shared

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-18 09:59:09 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
d6dd6d641b
Fix all possible setting error related storages and added some tests (#23911)
Follow up #22405

Fix #20703 

This PR rewrites storage configuration read sequences with some breaks
and tests. It becomes more strict than before and also fixed some
inherit problems.

- Move storage's MinioConfig struct into setting, so after the
configuration loading, the values will be stored into the struct but not
still on some section.
- All storages configurations should be stored on one section,
configuration items cannot be overrided by multiple sections. The
prioioty of configuration is `[attachment]` > `[storage.attachments]` |
`[storage.customized]` > `[storage]` > `default`
- For extra override configuration items, currently are `SERVE_DIRECT`,
`MINIO_BASE_PATH`, `MINIO_BUCKET`, which could be configured in another
section. The prioioty of the override configuration is `[attachment]` >
`[storage.attachments]` > `default`.
- Add more tests for storages configurations.
- Update the storage documentations.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-06-14 11:42:38 +08:00
sillyguodong
8228751c55
Support changing labels of Actions runner without re-registration (#24806)
close #24540

related:
- Protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/9
- Runner side: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/201

changes:
- Add column of `labels` to table `action_runner`, and combine the value
of `agent_labels` and `custom_labels` column to `labels` column.
- Store `labels` when registering `act_runner`.
- Update `labels` when `act_runner` starting and calling `Declare`.
- Users cannot modify the `custom labels` in edit page any more.

other changes:
- Store `version` when registering `act_runner`.
- If runner is latest version, parse version from `Declare`. But older
version runner still parse version from request header.
2023-06-13 22:28:31 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
419804fd4d
Fix compatible for webhook ref type (#25195)
Fix #25185 
Caused by #24634
2023-06-13 06:05:28 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
eac1bddb8d
fix swagger documentation for multiple files API endpoint (#25110)
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:

1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
2023-06-07 23:49:58 +08:00
Jack Hay
18de83b2a3
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
    - `activitypub`
    - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
    - `misc`
    - `notification`
    - `organization`
    - `package`
    - `issue`
    - `repository`
    - `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
  -  `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
  - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection

### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">

## tokenRequiresScopes  Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error

## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
   -  _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
   - For example: 
   ```go
	m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
		m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
		m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
   ```

## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default

Closes #24501
Closes #24799

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
JakobDev
1b115296d3
Followup to pinned Issues (#24945)
This addressees some things from #24406 that came up after the PR was
merged. Mostly from @delvh.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-30 15:26:51 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
275d4b7e3f
API endpoint for changing/creating/deleting multiple files (#24887)
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).

To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.

Resolves #14619
2023-05-29 17:41:35 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
e4922d484b
Fix ref type error (#24941) 2023-05-26 15:00:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634)
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
JakobDev
25dc1556cd
Add API for Label templates (#24602)
This adds API that allows getting the Label templates of the Gitea
Instance
2023-05-23 18:10:23 +08:00
yp05327
bebc3433c5
Add IsErrRepoFilesAlreadyExist check when fork repo (#24678)
Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/e9e3de75-eb6e-418e-9227-ef4e5f448a04)
After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/74b1cd6c-c5b1-4ee0-a1d8-6b3fb8d3a8e9)
2023-05-22 18:21:46 +08:00
KN4CK3R
cdb088cec2
Add CRAN package registry (#22331)
This PR adds a [CRAN](https://cran.r-project.org/) package registry.

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/210450039-d6fa6f77-20cd-4741-89a8-1624def267f7.png)
2023-05-22 10:57:49 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
c59a057297
Refactor rename user and rename organization (#24052)
This PR is a refactor at the beginning. And now it did 4 things.
- [x] Move renaming organizaiton and user logics into services layer and
merged as one function
- [x] Support rename a user capitalization only. For example, rename the
user from `Lunny` to `lunny`. We just need to change one table `user`
and others should not be touched.
- [x] Before this PR, some renaming were missed like `agit`
- [x] Fix bug the API reutrned from `http.StatusNoContent` to `http.StatusOK`
2023-05-21 23:13:47 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
64f6a5d113
Use CommentList instead of []*Comment (#24828)
As title.
2023-05-21 20:48:28 +08:00
Yevhen Pavlov
1dfaf83798
Return 404 in the API if the requested webhooks were not found (#24823)
Should resolve first point of the issue
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24574
2023-05-21 10:54:28 +08:00
wxiaoguang
6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
38cf43d060
Some refactors for issues stats (#24793)
This PR

- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
2023-05-19 22:17:48 +08:00
FuXiaoHei
c757765a9e
Implement actions artifacts (#22738)
Implement action artifacts server api.

This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts.
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.

Actions artifacts contains two parts:

- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)

Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.


![897f7694-3e0f-4f7c-bb4b-9936624ead45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2142787/219382371-eb3cf810-e4e0-456b-a8ff-aecc2b1a1032.jpeg)

Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.
2023-05-19 21:37:57 +08:00
KN4CK3R
5968c63a11
Add Go package registry (#24687)
Fixes #7608

This PR adds a Go package registry usable with the Go proxy protocol.

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/328feb5c-3df2-4f9d-8eae-fe3126d14c37)
2023-05-14 23:38:40 +08:00
Yarden Shoham
542adf50d5
Fix organization field being null in GET /api/v1/teams/{id} (#24694)
Enabled the organization loading flag.

- Fixes #20399 

# Before
```json
{
  ...
  "description": "",
  "organization": null,
  "includes_all_repositories": true,
  "permission": "owner",
  ...
}
```

# After
```json
{
  ...
  "description": "",
  "organization": {
    "id": 2,
    "name": "bigorg",
    "full_name": "",
    "avatar_url": "https://3000-yardenshoham-gitea-3gfrlc9gn4h.ws-us96b.gitpod.io/avatars/e2649b0c016d9102664a7d4349503eb9",
    "description": "",
    "website": "",
    "location": "",
    "visibility": "public",
    "repo_admin_change_team_access": true,
    "username": "bigorg"
  },
  "includes_all_repositories": true,
  "permission": "owner",
  ...
}
```

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-13 14:47:58 +00:00
KN4CK3R
9173e079ae
Add Alpine package registry (#23714)
This PR adds an Alpine package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package)
to build a *.apk package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry (#22854) and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after #22854.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/227779595-b76163aa-eea1-4a79-9583-775c24ad74e8.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-12 17:27:50 +00:00
Jason Song
2d0ff00823
Improve updating Actions tasks (#24600)
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-10 13:54:18 +02:00
Matthew Walowski
5930ab5fdf
Filter get single commit (#24613)
Pretty much the same thing as #24568 but for getting a single commit
instead of getting a list of commits
2023-05-10 09:34:07 +08:00
来自村里的小螃蟹
cd9a13ebb4
Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API (#22956)
#### Added
- API: Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API
- Added `old_ref_name` parameter to allow creating a new branch from a
specific commit, tag, or branch.
- Deprecated `old_branch_name` parameter in favor of the new
`old_ref_name` parameter.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-05-09 18:22:32 +08:00
wxiaoguang
023a048f52
Make repository response support HTTP range request (#24592)
Replace #20480
Replace #18448

Close #16414
2023-05-09 15:34:36 +08:00
Matthew Walowski
1dd83dbb91
Filters for GetAllCommits (#24568)
The `GetAllCommits` endpoint can be pretty slow, especially in repos
with a lot of commits. The issue is that it spends a lot of time
calculating information that may not be useful/needed by the user.

The `stat` param was previously added in #21337 to address this, by
allowing the user to disable the calculating stats for each commit. But
this has two issues:
1. The name `stat` is rather misleading, because disabling `stat`
disables the Stat **and** Files. This should be separated out into two
different params, because getting a list of affected files is much less
expensive than calculating the stats
2. There's still other costly information provided that the user may not
need, such as `Verification`

This PR, adds two parameters to the endpoint, `files` and `verification`
to allow the user to explicitly disable this information when listing
commits. The default behavior is true.
2023-05-09 09:06:05 +08:00
wxiaoguang
def4956122
Improve Gitea's web context, decouple "issue template" code into service package (#24590)
1. Remove unused fields/methods in web context.
2. Make callers call target function directly instead of the light
wrapper like "IsUserRepoReaderSpecific"
3. The "issue template" code shouldn't be put in the "modules/context"
package, so move them to the service package.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-09 01:30:14 +02:00
wxiaoguang
cb700aedd1
Split "modules/context.go" to separate files (#24569)
The "modules/context.go" is too large to maintain.

This PR splits it to separate files, eg: context_request.go,
context_response.go, context_serve.go

This PR will help:

1. The future refactoring for Gitea's web context (eg: simplify the context)
2. Introduce proper "range request" support
3. Introduce context function

This PR only moves code, doesn't change any logic.
2023-05-08 17:36:54 +08:00
Matthew Walowski
ff5629268c
Pass 'not' to commit count (#24473)
Due to #24409 , we can now specify '--not' when getting all commits from
a repo to exclude commits from a different branch.

When I wrote that PR, I forgot to also update the code that counts the
number of commits in the repo. So now, if the --not option is used, it
may return too many commits, which can indicate that another page of
data is available when it is not.

This PR passes --not to the commands that count the number of commits in
a repo
2023-05-08 07:10:53 +00:00