# Troubleshooting Sidekiq Sidekiq is the background job processor GitLab uses to asynchronously run tasks. When things go wrong it can be difficult to troubleshoot. These situations also tend to be high-pressure because a production system job queue may be filling up. Users will notice when this happens because new branches may not show up and merge requests may not be updated. The following are some troubleshooting steps that will help you diagnose the bottleneck. > **Note:** GitLab administrators/users should consider working through these > debug steps with GitLab Support so the backtraces can be analyzed by our team. > It may reveal a bug or necessary improvement in GitLab. > > **Note:** In any of the backtraces, be wary of suspecting cases where every > thread appears to be waiting in the database, Redis, or waiting to acquire > a mutex. This **may** mean there's contention in the database, for example, > but look for one thread that is different than the rest. This other thread > may be using all available CPU, or have a Ruby Global Interpreter Lock, > preventing other threads from continuing. ## Log arguments to Sidekiq jobs If you want to see what arguments are being passed to Sidekiq jobs you can set the `SIDEKIQ_LOG_ARGUMENTS` [environment variable](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/environment-variables.html) to `1` (true). Example: ``` gitlab_rails['env'] = {"SIDEKIQ_LOG_ARGUMENTS" => "1"} ``` Please note: It is not recommend to enable this setting in production because some Sidekiq jobs (such as sending a password reset email) take secret arguments (for example the password reset token). When using [Sidekiq JSON logging](../logs.md#sidekiqlog), arguments logs are limited to a maximum size of 10 kilobytes of text; any arguments after this limit will be discarded and replaced with a single argument containing the string `"..."`. ## Thread dump Send the Sidekiq process ID the `TTIN` signal and it will output thread backtraces in the log file. ``` kill -TTIN ``` Check in `/var/log/gitlab/sidekiq/current` or `$GITLAB_HOME/log/sidekiq.log` for the backtrace output. The backtraces will be lengthy and generally start with several `WARN` level messages. Here's an example of a single thread's backtrace: ```plaintext 2016-04-13T06:21:20.022Z 31517 TID-orn4urby0 WARN: ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find Note with 'id'=3375386 2016-04-13T06:21:20.022Z 31517 TID-orn4urby0 WARN: /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/activerecord-4.2.5.2/lib/active_record/core.rb:155:in `find' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/app/workers/new_note_worker.rb:7:in `perform' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/sidekiq-4.0.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:150:in `execute_job' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/sidekiq-4.0.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:132:in `block (2 levels) in process' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/sidekiq-4.0.1/lib/sidekiq/middleware/chain.rb:127:in `block in invoke' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/gitlab/sidekiq_middleware/memory_killer.rb:17:in `call' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/sidekiq-4.0.1/lib/sidekiq/middleware/chain.rb:129:in `block in invoke' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/gitlab/sidekiq_middleware/arguments_logger.rb:6:in `call' ... ``` In some cases Sidekiq may be hung and unable to respond to the `TTIN` signal. Move on to other troubleshooting methods if this happens. ## Process profiling with `perf` Linux has a process profiling tool called `perf` that is helpful when a certain process is eating up a lot of CPU. If you see high CPU usage and Sidekiq won't respond to the `TTIN` signal, this is a good next step. If `perf` is not installed on your system, install it with `apt-get` or `yum`: ```shell # Debian sudo apt-get install linux-tools # Ubuntu (may require these additional Kernel packages) sudo apt-get install linux-tools-common linux-tools-generic linux-tools-`uname -r` # Red Hat/CentOS sudo yum install perf ``` Run perf against the Sidekiq PID: ```shell sudo perf record -p ``` Let this run for 30-60 seconds and then press Ctrl-C. Then view the perf report: ```shell sudo perf report # Sample output Samples: 348K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 280908431073 97.69% ruby nokogiri.so [.] xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear 0.18% ruby libruby.so.2.1.0 [.] objspace_malloc_increase 0.12% ruby libc-2.12.so [.] _int_malloc 0.10% ruby libc-2.12.so [.] _int_free ``` Above you see sample output from a perf report. It shows that 97% of the CPU is being spent inside Nokogiri and `xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear`. For something this obvious you should then go investigate what job in GitLab would use Nokogiri and XPath. Combine with `TTIN` or `gdb` output to show the corresponding Ruby code where this is happening. ## The GNU Project Debugger (gdb) `gdb` can be another effective tool for debugging Sidekiq. It gives you a little more interactive way to look at each thread and see what's causing problems. NOTE: **Note:** Attaching to a process with `gdb` will suspends the normal operation of the process (Sidekiq will not process jobs while `gdb` is attached). Start by attaching to the Sidekiq PID: ```shell gdb -p ``` Then gather information on all the threads: ```plaintext info threads # Example output 30 Thread 0x7fe5fbd63700 (LWP 26060) 0x0000003f7cadf113 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6 29 Thread 0x7fe5f2b3b700 (LWP 26533) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 28 Thread 0x7fe5f2a3a700 (LWP 26534) 0x0000003f7ce0ba5e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 27 Thread 0x7fe5f2939700 (LWP 26535) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 26 Thread 0x7fe5f2838700 (LWP 26537) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 25 Thread 0x7fe5f2737700 (LWP 26538) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 24 Thread 0x7fe5f2535700 (LWP 26540) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 23 Thread 0x7fe5f2434700 (LWP 26541) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 22 Thread 0x7fe5f2232700 (LWP 26543) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 21 Thread 0x7fe5f2131700 (LWP 26544) 0x00007fe5f7b570f0 in xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so ... ``` If you see a suspicious thread, like the Nokogiri one above, you may want to get more information: ```plaintext thread 21 bt # Example output #0 0x00007ff0d6afe111 in xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #1 0x00007ff0d6b0b836 in xmlXPathNodeCollectAndTest () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #2 0x00007ff0d6b09037 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #3 0x00007ff0d6b09017 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #4 0x00007ff0d6b092e0 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #5 0x00007ff0d6b0bc37 in xmlXPathRunEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #6 0x00007ff0d6b0be5f in xmlXPathEvalExpression () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so #7 0x00007ff0d6a97dc3 in evaluate (argc=2, argv=0x1022d058, self=) at xml_xpath_context.c:221 #8 0x00007ff0daeab0ea in vm_call_cfunc_with_frame (th=0x1022a4f0, reg_cfp=0x1032b810, ci=) at vm_insnhelper.c:1510 ``` To output a backtrace from all threads at once: ```plaintext set pagination off thread apply all bt ``` Once you're done debugging with `gdb`, be sure to detach from the process and exit: ```plaintext detach exit ``` ## Check for blocking queries Sometimes the speed at which Sidekiq processes jobs can be so fast that it can cause database contention. Check for blocking queries when backtraces above show that many threads are stuck in the database adapter. The PostgreSQL wiki has details on the query you can run to see blocking queries. The query is different based on PostgreSQL version. See [Lock Monitoring](https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring) for the query details. ## Managing Sidekiq queues It is possible to use [Sidekiq API](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/wiki/API) to perform a number of troubleshooting on Sidekiq. These are the administrative commands and it should only be used if currently admin interface is not suitable due to scale of installation. All this commands should be run using `gitlab-rails console`. ### View the queue size ```ruby Sidekiq::Queue.new("pipeline_processing:build_queue").size ``` ### Enumerate all enqueued jobs ```ruby queue = Sidekiq::Queue.new("chaos:chaos_sleep") queue.each do |job| # job.klass # => 'MyWorker' # job.args # => [1, 2, 3] # job.jid # => jid # job.queue # => chaos:chaos_sleep # job["retry"] # => 3 # job.item # => { # "class"=>"Chaos::SleepWorker", # "args"=>[1000], # "retry"=>3, # "queue"=>"chaos:chaos_sleep", # "backtrace"=>true, # "queue_namespace"=>"chaos", # "jid"=>"39bc482b823cceaf07213523", # "created_at"=>1566317076.266069, # "correlation_id"=>"c323b832-a857-4858-b695-672de6f0e1af", # "enqueued_at"=>1566317076.26761}, # } # job.delete if job.jid == 'abcdef1234567890' end ``` ### Enumerate currently running jobs ```ruby workers = Sidekiq::Workers.new workers.each do |process_id, thread_id, work| # process_id is a unique identifier per Sidekiq process # thread_id is a unique identifier per thread # work is a Hash which looks like: # {"queue"=>"chaos:chaos_sleep", # "payload"=> # { "class"=>"Chaos::SleepWorker", # "args"=>[1000], # "retry"=>3, # "queue"=>"chaos:chaos_sleep", # "backtrace"=>true, # "queue_namespace"=>"chaos", # "jid"=>"b2a31e3eac7b1a99ff235869", # "created_at"=>1566316974.9215662, # "correlation_id"=>"e484fb26-7576-45f9-bf21-b99389e1c53c", # "enqueued_at"=>1566316974.9229589}, # "run_at"=>1566316974}], end ``` ### Remove Sidekiq jobs for given parameters (destructive) ```ruby # for jobs like this: # RepositoryImportWorker.new.perform_async(100) id_list = [100] queue = Sidekiq::Queue.new('repository_import') queue.each do |job| job.delete if id_list.include?(job.args[0]) end ``` ### Remove specific job ID (destructive) ```ruby queue = Sidekiq::Queue.new('repository_import') queue.each do |job| job.delete if job.jid == 'my-job-id' end ``` ## Canceling running jobs (destructive) > Introduced in GitLab 12.3. This is highly risky operation and use it as last resort. Doing that might result in data corruption, as the job is interrupted mid-execution and it is not guaranteed that proper rollback of transactions is implemented. ```ruby Gitlab::SidekiqDaemon::Monitor.cancel_job('job-id') ``` > This requires the Sidekiq to be run with `SIDEKIQ_MONITOR_WORKER=1` > environment variable. To perform of the interrupt we use `Thread.raise` which has number of drawbacks, as mentioned in [Why Ruby’s Timeout is dangerous (and Thread.raise is terrifying)](https://jvns.ca/blog/2015/11/27/why-rubys-timeout-is-dangerous-and-thread-dot-raise-is-terrifying/): > This is where the implications get interesting, and terrifying. This means that an exception can get raised: > > - during a network request (ok, as long as the surrounding code is prepared to catch Timeout::Error) > - during the cleanup for the network request > - during a rescue block > - while creating an object to save to the database afterwards > - in any of your code, regardless of whether it could have possibly raised an exception before > > Nobody writes code to defend against an exception being raised on literally any line. That’s not even possible. So Thread.raise is basically like a sneak attack on your code that could result in almost anything. It would probably be okay if it were pure-functional code that did not modify any state. But this is Ruby, so that’s unlikely :)