--- stage: none group: unassigned info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments --- # Resource classes in GitLab QA Resources are primarily created using Browser UI steps, but can also be created via the API or the CLI. ## How to properly implement a resource class? All resource classes should inherit from `Resource::Base`. There is only one mandatory method to implement to define a resource class. This is the `#fabricate!` method, which is used to build the resource via the browser UI. Note that you should only use [Page objects](page_objects.md) to interact with a Web page in this method. Here is an imaginary example: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base attr_accessor :name def fabricate! Page::Dashboard::Index.perform do |dashboard_index| dashboard_index.go_to_new_shirt end Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new| shirt_new.set_name(name) shirt_new.create_shirt! end end end end end ``` ### Define API implementation A resource class may also implement the three following methods to be able to create the resource via the public GitLab API: - `#api_get_path`: The `GET` path to fetch an existing resource. - `#api_post_path`: The `POST` path to create a new resource. - `#api_post_body`: The `POST` body (as a Ruby hash) to create a new resource. > Be aware that many API resources are [paginated](../../../api/rest/index.md#pagination). > If you don't find the results you expect, check if there is more that one page of results. Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and add these three API methods: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base attr_accessor :name def fabricate! # ... same as before end def api_get_path "/shirt/#{name}" end def api_post_path "/shirts" end def api_post_body { name: name } end end end end ``` The `Project` resource is a good real example of Browser UI and API implementations. #### Resource attributes A resource may need another resource to exist first. For instance, a project needs a group to be created in. To define a resource attribute, you can use the `attribute` method with a block using the other resource class to fabricate the resource. That allows access to the other resource from your resource object's methods. You would usually use it in `#fabricate!`, `#api_get_path`, `#api_post_path`, `#api_post_body`. Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and add a `project` attribute to it: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base attr_accessor :name attribute :project do Project.fabricate! do |resource| resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt' end end def fabricate! project.visit! Page::Project::Show.perform do |project_show| project_show.go_to_new_shirt end Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new| shirt_new.set_name(name) shirt_new.create_shirt! end end def api_get_path "/project/#{project.path}/shirt/#{name}" end def api_post_path "/project/#{project.path}/shirts" end def api_post_body { name: name } end end end end ``` **Note that all the attributes are lazily constructed. This means if you want a specific attribute to be fabricated first, you must call the attribute method first even if you're not using it.** #### Product data attributes Once created, you may want to populate a resource with attributes that can be found in the Web page, or in the API response. For instance, once you create a project, you may want to store its repository SSH URL as an attribute. Again we could use the `attribute` method with a block, using a page object to retrieve the data on the page. Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and define a `:brand` attribute: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base attr_accessor :name attribute :project do Project.fabricate! do |resource| resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt' end end # Attribute populated from the Browser UI (using the block) attribute :brand do Page::Shirt::Show.perform do |shirt_show| shirt_show.fetch_brand_from_page end end # ... same as before end end end ``` **Note again that all the attributes are lazily constructed. This means if you call `shirt.brand` after moving to the other page, it doesn't properly retrieve the data because we're no longer on the expected page.** Consider this: ```ruby shirt = QA::Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |resource| resource.name = "GitLab QA" end shirt.project.visit! shirt.brand # => FAIL! ``` The above example fails because now we're on the project page, trying to construct the brand data from the shirt page, however we moved to the project page already. There are two ways to solve this, one is that we could try to retrieve the brand before visiting the project again: ```ruby shirt = QA::Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |resource| resource.name = "GitLab QA" end shirt.brand # => OK! shirt.project.visit! shirt.brand # => OK! ``` The attribute is stored in the instance, therefore all the following calls are fine, using the data previously constructed. If we think that this might be too brittle, we could eagerly construct the data right before ending fabrication: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base # ... same as before def fabricate! project.visit! Page::Project::Show.perform do |project_show| project_show.go_to_new_shirt end Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new| shirt_new.set_name(name) shirt_new.create_shirt! end populate(:brand) # Eagerly construct the data end end end end ``` The `populate` method iterates through its arguments and call each attribute respectively. Here `populate(:brand)` has the same effect as just `brand`. Using the populate method makes the intention clearer. With this, it ensures we construct the data right after we create the shirt. The drawback is that this always constructs the data when the resource is fabricated even if we don't need to use the data. Alternatively, we could just make sure we're on the right page before constructing the brand data: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base attr_accessor :name attribute :project do Project.fabricate! do |resource| resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt' end end # Attribute populated from the Browser UI (using the block) attribute :brand do back_url = current_url visit! Page::Shirt::Show.perform do |shirt_show| shirt_show.fetch_brand_from_page end visit(back_url) end # ... same as before end end end ``` This ensures it's on the shirt page before constructing brand, and move back to the previous page to avoid breaking the state. #### Define an attribute based on an API response Sometimes, you want to define a resource attribute based on the API response from its `GET` or `POST` request. For instance, if the creation of a shirt via the API returns ```ruby { brand: 'a-brand-new-brand', style: 't-shirt', materials: [[:cotton, 80], [:polyamide, 20]] } ``` you may want to store `style` as-is in the resource, and fetch the first value of the first `materials` item in a `main_fabric` attribute. Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and define a `:style` and a `:main_fabric` attributes: ```ruby module QA module Resource class Shirt < Base # ... same as before # @style from the instance if present, # or fetched from the API response if present, # or a QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError is raised otherwise attribute :style # If @main_fabric is not present, # and if the API does not contain this field, this block will be # used to construct the value based on the API response, and # store the result in @main_fabric attribute :main_fabric do api_response.&dig(:materials, 0, 0) end # ... same as before end end end ``` **Notes on attributes precedence:** - resource instance variables have the highest precedence - attributes from the API response take precedence over attributes from the block (usually from Browser UI) - attributes without a value raises a `QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError` error ## Creating resources in your tests To create a resource in your tests, you can call the `.fabricate!` method on the resource class. Note that if the resource class supports API fabrication, this uses this fabrication by default. Here is an example that uses the API fabrication method under the hood since it's supported by the `Shirt` resource class: ```ruby my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |shirt| shirt.name = 'my-shirt' end expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.name) # => "my-shirt" from the resource's instance variable expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.brand) # => "a-brand-new-brand" from the API response expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.style) # => "t-shirt" from the API response expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.main_fabric) # => "cotton" from the API response via the block ``` If you explicitly want to use the Browser UI fabrication method, you can call the `.fabricate_via_browser_ui!` method instead: ```ruby my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate_via_browser_ui! do |shirt| shirt.name = 'my-shirt' end expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.name) # => "my-shirt" from the resource's instance variable expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.brand) # => the brand name fetched from the `Page::Shirt::Show` page via the block expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.style) # => QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError will be raised because no API response nor a block is provided expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.main_fabric) # => QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError will be raised because no API response and the block didn't provide a value (because it's also based on the API response) ``` You can also explicitly use the API fabrication method, by calling the `.fabricate_via_api!` method: ```ruby my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate_via_api! do |shirt| shirt.name = 'my-shirt' end ``` In this case, the result is similar to calling `Resource::Shirt.fabricate!`. ### Resources cleanup We have a mechanism to [collect](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/44345381e89d6bbd440f7b4c680d03e8b75b86de/qa/qa/tools/test_resource_data_processor.rb#L32) all resources created during test executions, and another to [handle](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/44345381e89d6bbd440f7b4c680d03e8b75b86de/qa/qa/tools/test_resources_handler.rb#L44) these resources. On [dotcom environments](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/environments/#environments), after a test suite finishes in the [QA pipelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/quality-engineering/debugging-qa-test-failures/#scheduled-qa-test-pipelines), resources from all passing test are automatically deleted in the same pipeline run. Resources from all failed tests are reserved for investigation, and won't be deleted until the following Saturday by a scheduled pipeline. When introducing new resources, please also make sure to add any resource that cannot be deleted to the [IGNORED_RESOURCES](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/44345381e89d6bbd440f7b4c680d03e8b75b86de/qa/qa/tools/test_resources_handler.rb#L29) list. ## Where to ask for help? If you need more information, ask for help on `#quality` channel on Slack (internal, GitLab Team only). If you are not a Team Member, and you still need help to contribute, please open an issue in GitLab CE issue tracker with the `~QA` label.