debian-mirror-gitlab/doc/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.md

272 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
---
2020-07-28 23:09:34 +05:30
stage: Verify
group: Testing
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
type: reference, howto
---
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
# Test coverage visualization **(FREE)**
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2020-10-24 23:57:45 +05:30
> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/3708) in GitLab 12.9.
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
> - [Feature flag removed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/249811) in GitLab 13.5.
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
With the help of [GitLab CI/CD](../../../ci/index.md), you can collect the test
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
coverage information of your favorite testing or coverage-analysis tool, and visualize
this information inside the file diff view of your merge requests (MRs). This will allow you
to see which lines are covered by tests, and which lines still require coverage, before the
MR is merged.
![Test Coverage Visualization Diff View](img/test_coverage_visualization_v12_9.png)
## How test coverage visualization works
Collecting the coverage information is done via GitLab CI/CD's
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
[artifacts reports feature](../../../ci/yaml/index.md#artifactsreports).
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
You can specify one or more coverage reports to collect, including wildcard paths.
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
GitLab then takes the coverage information in all the files and combines it
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
together.
2020-04-22 19:07:51 +05:30
For the coverage analysis to work, you have to provide a properly formatted
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
[Cobertura XML](https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura/) report to
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
[`artifacts:reports:cobertura`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md#artifactsreportscobertura).
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
This format was originally developed for Java, but most coverage analysis frameworks
for other languages have plugins to add support for it, like:
- [simplecov-cobertura](https://rubygems.org/gems/simplecov-cobertura) (Ruby)
2021-03-08 18:12:59 +05:30
- [gocover-cobertura](https://github.com/boumenot/gocover-cobertura) (Golang)
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
Other coverage analysis frameworks support the format out of the box, for example:
- [Istanbul](https://istanbul.js.org/docs/advanced/alternative-reporters/#cobertura) (JavaScript)
2020-04-22 19:07:51 +05:30
- [Coverage.py](https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/coverage-5.0.4/cmd.html#xml-reporting) (Python)
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
Once configured, if you create a merge request that triggers a pipeline which collects
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
coverage reports, the coverage is shown in the diff view. This includes reports
from any job in any stage in the pipeline. The coverage displays for each line:
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
- `covered` (green): lines which have been checked at least once by tests
- `no test coverage` (orange): lines which are loaded but never executed
- no coverage information: lines which are non-instrumented or not loaded
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
Hovering over the coverage bar provides further information, such as the number
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
of times the line was checked by tests.
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
NOTE:
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
A limit of 100 `<source>` nodes for Cobertura format XML files applies. If your Cobertura report exceeds
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
100 nodes, there can be mismatches or no matches in the merge request diff view.
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-04-29 21:17:54 +05:30
### Artifact expiration
By default, the [pipeline artifact](../../../ci/pipelines/pipeline_artifacts.md#storage) used
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
to draw the visualization on the merge request expires **one week** after creation.
2021-04-29 21:17:54 +05:30
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
### Automatic class path correction
> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/217664) in GitLab 13.8.
> - [Feature flag removed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/284822) in GitLab 13.9.
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
The coverage report properly matches changed files only if the `filename` of a `class` element
contains the full path relative to the project root. However, in some coverage analysis frameworks,
the generated Cobertura XML has the `filename` path relative to the class package directory instead.
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
To make an intelligent guess on the project root relative `class` path, the Cobertura XML parser
attempts to build the full path by:
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
- Extracting a portion of the `source` paths from the `sources` element and combining them with the
class `filename` path.
- Checking if the candidate path exists in the project.
- Using the first candidate that matches as the class full path.
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
#### Path correction example
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
As an example, a project with:
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
- A full path of `test-org/test-project`.
- The following files relative to the project root:
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
```shell
Auth/User.cs
Lib/Utils/User.cs
src/main/java
```
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
In the:
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
- Cobertura XML, the `filename` attribute in the `class` element assumes the value is a relative
path to the project's root:
```xml
<class name="packet.name" filename="src/main/java" line-rate="0.0" branch-rate="0.0" complexity="5">
```
- `sources` from Cobertura XML, the following paths in the format
`<CI_BUILDS_DIR>/<PROJECT_FULL_PATH>/...`:
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
```xml
<sources>
<source>/builds/test-org/test-project/Auth</source>
<source>/builds/test-org/test-project/Lib/Utils</source>
</sources>
```
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
The parser:
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
- Extracts `Auth` and `Lib/Utils` from the `sources` and uses these to determine the `class` path
relative to the project root.
- Combines these extracted `sources` and the class filename. For example, if there is a `class`
element with the `filename` value of `User.cs`, the parser takes the first candidate path that
matches, which is `Auth/User.cs`.
- For each `class` element, attempts to look for a match for each extracted `source` path up to
100 iterations. If it reaches this limit without finding a matching path in the file tree, the
class is not included in the final coverage report.
2021-03-11 19:13:27 +05:30
NOTE:
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
Automatic class path correction only works on `source` paths in the format `<CI_BUILDS_DIR>/<PROJECT_FULL_PATH>/...`.
The `source` is ignored if the path does not follow this pattern. The parser assumes that the
`filename` of a `class` element contains the full path relative to the project root.
2020-10-24 23:57:45 +05:30
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
## Example test coverage configurations
### JavaScript example
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
The following [`gitlab-ci.yml`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md) example uses [Mocha](https://mochajs.org/)
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
JavaScript testing and [nyc](https://github.com/istanbuljs/nyc) coverage-tooling to
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
generate the coverage artifact:
```yaml
test:
script:
- npm install
- npx nyc --reporter cobertura mocha
artifacts:
reports:
cobertura: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml
```
2021-01-29 00:20:46 +05:30
### Java and Kotlin examples
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
#### Maven example
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
The following [`gitlab-ci.yml`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md) example for Java or Kotlin uses [Maven](https://maven.apache.org/)
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
to build the project and [JaCoCo](https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/) coverage-tooling to
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
generate the coverage artifact.
You can check the [Docker image configuration and scripts](https://gitlab.com/haynes/jacoco2cobertura) if you want to build your own image.
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
GitLab expects the artifact in the Cobertura format, so you have to execute a few
scripts before uploading it. The `test-jdk11` job tests the code and generates an
XML artifact. The `coverage-jdk-11` job converts the artifact into a Cobertura report:
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
```yaml
test-jdk11:
stage: test
image: maven:3.6.3-jdk-11
script:
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
- mvn $MAVEN_CLI_OPTS clean org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin:prepare-agent test jacoco:report
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
artifacts:
paths:
- target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml
coverage-jdk11:
# Must be in a stage later than test-jdk11's stage.
# The `visualize` stage does not exist by default.
2021-09-04 01:27:46 +05:30
# Please define it first, or choose an existing stage like `deploy`.
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
stage: visualize
2021-04-17 20:07:23 +05:30
image: registry.gitlab.com/haynes/jacoco2cobertura:1.0.7
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
script:
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
# convert report from jacoco to cobertura, using relative project path
- python /opt/cover2cover.py target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml $CI_PROJECT_DIR/src/main/java/ > target/site/cobertura.xml
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
needs: ["test-jdk11"]
dependencies:
- test-jdk11
artifacts:
reports:
cobertura: target/site/cobertura.xml
2020-10-24 23:57:45 +05:30
```
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
#### Gradle example
2020-10-24 23:57:45 +05:30
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
The following [`gitlab-ci.yml`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md) example for Java or Kotlin uses [Gradle](https://gradle.org/)
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
to build the project and [JaCoCo](https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/) coverage-tooling to
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
generate the coverage artifact.
You can check the [Docker image configuration and scripts](https://gitlab.com/haynes/jacoco2cobertura) if you want to build your own image.
GitLab expects the artifact in the Cobertura format, so you have to execute a few
scripts before uploading it. The `test-jdk11` job tests the code and generates an
XML artifact. The `coverage-jdk-11` job converts the artifact into a Cobertura report:
```yaml
test-jdk11:
stage: test
image: gradle:6.6.1-jdk11
script:
- 'gradle test jacocoTestReport' # jacoco must be configured to create an xml report
artifacts:
paths:
- build/jacoco/jacoco.xml
coverage-jdk11:
# Must be in a stage later than test-jdk11's stage.
# The `visualize` stage does not exist by default.
# Please define it first, or chose an existing stage like `deploy`.
stage: visualize
2021-04-17 20:07:23 +05:30
image: registry.gitlab.com/haynes/jacoco2cobertura:1.0.7
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
script:
2021-06-08 01:23:25 +05:30
# convert report from jacoco to cobertura, using relative project path
- python /opt/cover2cover.py build/jacoco/jacoco.xml $CI_PROJECT_DIR/src/main/java/ > build/cobertura.xml
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
needs: ["test-jdk11"]
dependencies:
- test-jdk11
artifacts:
reports:
cobertura: build/cobertura.xml
2020-04-08 14:13:33 +05:30
```
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
### Python example
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
The following [`gitlab-ci.yml`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md) example for Python uses [pytest-cov](https://pytest-cov.readthedocs.io/) to collect test coverage data and [coverage.py](https://coverage.readthedocs.io/) to convert the report to use full relative paths.
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
The information isn't displayed without the conversion.
This example assumes that the code for your package is in `src/` and your tests are in `tests.py`:
```yaml
run tests:
stage: test
image: python:3
script:
- pip install pytest pytest-cov
- pytest --cov=src/ tests.py
- coverage xml
artifacts:
reports:
cobertura: coverage.xml
```
2021-04-17 20:07:23 +05:30
### C/C++ example
2021-09-30 23:02:18 +05:30
The following [`gitlab-ci.yml`](../../../ci/yaml/index.md) example for C/C++ with
2021-04-17 20:07:23 +05:30
`gcc` or `g++` as the compiler uses [`gcovr`](https://gcovr.com/en/stable/) to generate the coverage
output file in Cobertura XML format.
This example assumes:
- That the `Makefile` is created by `cmake` in the `build` directory,
within another job in a previous stage.
(If you use `automake` to generate the `Makefile`,
then you need to call `make check` instead of `make test`.)
- `cmake` (or `automake`) has set the compiler option `--coverage`.
```yaml
run tests:
stage: test
script:
- cd build
- make test
- gcovr --xml-pretty --exclude-unreachable-branches --print-summary -o coverage.xml --root ${CI_PROJECT_DIR}
coverage: /^\s*lines:\s*\d+.\d+\%/
artifacts:
name: ${CI_JOB_NAME}-${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}-${CI_COMMIT_SHA}
expire_in: 2 days
reports:
cobertura: build/coverage.xml
```