2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
---
2022-11-25 23:54:43 +05:30
stage: Manage
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
group: Integrations
2022-11-25 23:54:43 +05:30
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
description: "GitLab's development guidelines for Integrations"
---
2023-05-27 22:25:52 +05:30
# Integrations development guidelines
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
This page provides development guidelines for implementing [GitLab integrations ](../../user/project/integrations/index.md ),
which are part of our [main Rails project ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab ).
2023-01-13 00:05:48 +05:30
Also see our [direction page ](https://about.gitlab.com/direction/manage/integrations/ ) for an overview of our strategy around integrations.
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
2023-01-13 00:05:48 +05:30
This guide is a work in progress. You're welcome to ping `@gitlab-org/manage/integrations`
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
if you need clarification or spot any outdated information.
## Add a new integration
### Define the integration
1. Add a new model in `app/models/integrations` extending from `Integration` .
- For example, `Integrations::FooBar` in `app/models/integrations/foo_bar.rb` .
- For certain types of integrations, you can also build on these base classes:
- `Integrations::BaseChatNotification`
- `Integrations::BaseIssueTracker`
- `Integrations::BaseMonitoring`
- `Integrations::BaseSlashCommands`
- For integrations that primarily trigger HTTP calls to external services, you can
also use the `Integrations::HasWebHook` concern. This reuses the [webhook functionality ](../../user/project/integrations/webhooks.md )
in GitLab through an associated `ServiceHook` model, and automatically records request logs
which can be viewed in the integration settings.
1. Add the integration's underscored name (`'foo_bar'`) to `Integration::INTEGRATION_NAMES` .
1. Add the integration as an association on `Project` :
```ruby
has_one :foo_bar_integration, class_name: 'Integrations::FooBar'
```
1. TEMPORARY: Accommodate the current migration to [rename "services" to "integrations" ](#rename-services-to-integrations ):
- Add the integration's camel-cased name (`'FooBar'`) to `Gitlab::Integrations::StiType::NAMESPACED_INTEGRATIONS` .
### Define properties
Integrations can define arbitrary properties to store their configuration with the class method `Integration.prop_accessor` .
2022-07-23 23:45:48 +05:30
The values are stored as an encrypted JSON hash in the `integrations.encrypted_properties` column.
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
For example:
```ruby
module Integrations
class FooBar < Integration
prop_accessor :url
prop_accessor :tags
end
end
```
`Integration.prop_accessor` installs accessor methods on the class. Here we would have `#url` , `#url=` and `#url_changed?` , to manage the `url` field. Fields stored in `Integration#properties` should be accessed by these accessors directly on the model, just like other ActiveRecord attributes.
2023-03-04 22:38:38 +05:30
You should always access the properties through their `getters` , and not interact with the `properties` hash directly.
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
You **must not** write to the `properties` hash, you **must** use the generated setter method instead. Direct writes to this
hash are not persisted.
You should also define validations for all your properties.
Also refer to the section [Customize the frontend form ](#customize-the-frontend-form ) below to see how these properties
are exposed in the frontend form for the integration.
There is an alternative approach using `Integration.data_field` , which you may see in other integrations.
With data fields the values are stored in a separate table per integration. At the moment we don't recommend using this for new integrations.
### Define trigger events
Integrations are triggered by calling their `#execute` method in response to events in GitLab,
which gets passed a payload hash with details about the event.
The supported events have some overlap with [webhook events ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md ),
and receive the same payload. You can specify the events you're interested in by overriding
the class method `Integration.supported_events` in your model.
The following events are supported for integrations:
| Event type | Default | Value | Trigger
|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:--------|:---------------------|:--
| Alert event | | `alert` | A a new, unique alert is recorded.
| Commit event | ✓ | `commit` | A commit is created or updated.
| [Deployment event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#deployment-events ) | | `deployment` | A deployment starts or finishes.
| [Issue event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#issue-events ) | ✓ | `issue` | An issue is created, updated, or closed.
| [Confidential issue event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#issue-events ) | ✓ | `confidential_issue` | A confidential issue is created, updated, or closed.
| [Job event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#job-events ) | | `job`
| [Merge request event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#merge-request-events ) | ✓ | `merge_request` | A merge request is created, updated, or merged.
| [Comment event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#comment-events ) | | `comment` | A new comment is added.
| [Confidential comment event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#comment-events ) | | `confidential_note` | A new comment on a confidential issue is added.
| [Pipeline event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#pipeline-events ) | | `pipeline` | A pipeline status changes.
| [Push event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#push-events ) | ✓ | `push` | A push is made to the repository.
| [Tag push event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#tag-events ) | ✓ | `tag_push` | New tags are pushed to the repository.
| Vulnerability event ** (ULTIMATE)** | | `vulnerability` | A new, unique vulnerability is recorded.
| [Wiki page event ](../../user/project/integrations/webhook_events.md#wiki-page-events ) | ✓ | `wiki_page` | A wiki page is created or updated.
#### Event examples
This example defines an integration that responds to `commit` and `merge_request` events:
```ruby
module Integrations
class FooBar < Integration
def self.supported_events
%w[commit merge_request]
end
end
end
```
An integration can also not respond to events, and implement custom functionality some other way:
```ruby
module Integrations
class FooBar < Integration
def self.supported_events
[]
end
end
end
```
2023-03-04 22:38:38 +05:30
## Define configuration test
Optionally, you can define a configuration test of an integration's settings. The test is executed from the integration form's **Test** button, and results are returned to the user.
A good configuration test:
- Does not change data on the service. For example, it should not trigger a CI build. Sending a message is okay.
- Is meaningful and as thorough as possible.
If it's not possible to follow the above guidelines, consider not adding a configuration test.
To add a configuration test, define a `#test` method for the integration model.
The method receives `data` , which is a test push event payload.
It should return a hash, containing the keys:
- `success` (required): a boolean to indicate if the configuration test has passed.
- `result` (optional): a message returned to the user if the configuration test has failed.
For example:
```ruby
module Integrations
class FooBar < Integration
def test(data)
success = test_api_key(data)
{ success: success, result: 'API key is invalid' }
end
end
end
```
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
### Customize the frontend form
The frontend form is generated dynamically based on metadata defined in the model.
By default, the integration form provides:
- A checkbox to enable or disable the integration.
- Checkboxes for each of the trigger events returned from `Integration#configurable_events` .
You can also add help text at the top of the form by either overriding `Integration#help` ,
2022-07-16 23:28:13 +05:30
or providing a template in `app/views/shared/integrations/$INTEGRATION_NAME/_help.html.haml` .
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
To add your custom properties to the form, you can define the metadata for them in `Integration#fields` .
This method should return an array of hashes for each field, where the keys can be:
| Key | Type | Required | Default | Description
|:---------------|:--------|:---------|:-----------------------------|:--
| `type:` | string | true | | The type of the form field. Can be `text` , `textarea` , `password` , `checkbox` , or `select` .
| `name:` | string | true | | The property name for the form field. This must match a `prop_accessor` [defined on the class ](#define-properties ).
| `required:` | boolean | false | `false` | Specify if the form field is required or optional.
| `title:` | string | false | Capitalized value of `name:` | The label for the form field.
| `placeholder:` | string | false | | A placeholder for the form field.
| `help:` | string | false | | A help text that displays below the form field.
2022-08-13 15:12:31 +05:30
| `api_only:` | boolean | false | `false` | Specify if the field should only be available through the API, and excluded from the frontend form.
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
#### Additional keys for `type: 'checkbox'`
| Key | Type | Required | Default | Description
|:------------------|:-------|:---------|:------------------|:--
| `checkbox_label:` | string | false | Value of `title:` | A custom label that displays next to the checkbox.
#### Additional keys for `type: 'select'`
| Key | Type | Required | Default | Description
|:-----------|:------|:---------|:--------|:--
| `choices:` | array | true | | A nested array of `[label, value]` tuples.
#### Additional keys for `type: 'password'`
| Key | Type | Required | Default | Description
|:----------------------------|:-------|:---------|:------------------|:--
| `non_empty_password_title:` | string | false | Value of `title:` | An alternative label that displays when a value is already stored.
| `non_empty_password_help:` | string | false | Value of `help:` | An alternative help text that displays when a value is already stored.
#### Frontend form examples
This example defines a required `url` field, and optional `username` and `password` fields:
```ruby
module Integrations
class FooBar < Integration
prop_accessor :url, :username, :password
def fields
[
{
type: 'text',
name: 'url',
title: s_('FooBarIntegration|Server URL'),
placeholder: 'https://example.com/',
required: true
},
{
type: 'text',
name: 'username',
title: s_('FooBarIntegration|Username'),
},
{
type: 'password',
name: 'password',
title: s_('FoobarIntegration|Password'
non_empty_password_title: s_('FooBarIntegration|Enter new password')
}
]
end
end
end
```
### Expose the integration in the API
#### REST API
To expose the integration in the [REST API ](../../api/integrations.md ):
1. Add the integration's class (`::Integrations::FooBar`) to `API::Helpers::IntegrationsHelpers.integration_classes` .
1. Add all properties that should be exposed to `API::Helpers::IntegrationsHelpers.integrations` .
1. Update the reference documentation in `doc/api/integrations.md` , add a new section for your integration, and document all properties.
You can also refer to our [REST API style guide ](../api_styleguide.md ).
2023-03-04 22:38:38 +05:30
Sensitive fields are not exposed over the API. Sensitive fields are those fields that contain any of the following in their name:
- `key`
- `passphrase`
- `password`
- `secret`
- `token`
- `webhook`
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
#### GraphQL API
Integrations use the `Types::Projects::ServiceType` type by default,
which only exposes the `type` and `active` properties.
To expose additional properties, you can write a class implementing `ServiceType` :
```ruby
# in app/graphql/types/project/services/foo_bar_service_type.rb
module Types
module Projects
module Services
class FooBarServiceType < BaseObject
graphql_name 'FooBarService'
implements(Types::Projects::ServiceType)
authorize :read_project
field :frobinity,
GraphQL::Types::Float,
null: true,
description: 'The level of frobinity.'
field :foo_label,
GraphQL::Types::String,
null: true,
description: 'The foo label to apply.'
end
end
end
end
```
Each property you want to expose should have a field defined for it. You can also expose any public instance method of the integration.
Contact a member of the Integrations team to discuss the best authorization.
Reference documentation for GraphQL is automatically generated.
You can also refer to our [GraphQL API style guide ](../api_graphql_styleguide.md ).
## Availability of integrations
By default, integrations are available on the project, group, and instance level.
Most integrations only act in a project context, but can be still configured
from the group and instance levels.
For some integrations it can make sense to only make it available on the project level.
To do that, the integration must be removed from `Integration::INTEGRATION_NAMES` and
added to `Integration::PROJECT_SPECIFIC_INTEGRATION_NAMES` instead.
When developing a new integration, we also recommend you gate the availability behind a
[feature flag ](../feature_flags/index.md ) in `Integration.available_integration_names` .
## Documentation
You can provide help text in the integration form, including links to off-site documentation,
as described above in [Customize the frontend form ](#customize-the-frontend-form ). Refer to
2023-05-27 22:25:52 +05:30
our [usability guidelines ](https://design.gitlab.com/usability/contextual-help ) for help text.
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
For more detailed documentation, provide a page in `doc/user/project/integrations` ,
2022-07-16 23:28:13 +05:30
and link it from the [Integrations overview ](../../user/project/integrations/index.md ).
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
You can also refer to our general [documentation guidelines ](../documentation/index.md ).
## Testing
2023-03-04 22:38:38 +05:30
Testing should not be confused with [defining configuration tests ](#define-configuration-test ).
2022-05-07 20:08:51 +05:30
It is often sufficient to add tests for the integration model in `spec/models/integrations` ,
and a factory with example settings in `spec/factories/integrations.rb` .
Each integration is also tested as part of generalized tests. For example, there are feature specs
that verify that the settings form is rendering correctly for all integrations.
If your integration implements any custom behavior, especially in the frontend, this should be
covered by additional tests.
You can also refer to our general [testing guidelines ](../testing_guide/index.md ).
## Internationalization
All UI strings should be prepared for translation by following our [internationalization guidelines ](../i18n/externalization.md ).
The strings should use the integration name as [namespace ](../i18n/externalization.md#namespaces ), for example, `s_('FooBarIntegration|My string')` .
## Ongoing migrations and refactorings
The Integrations team is in the process of some larger migrations that developers should be aware of.
### [Rename "services" to "integrations"](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/2504)
The "integrations" in GitLab were historically called "services", which frequently caused
confusion with our "service" classes in `app/services` . We sometimes also called
them "project services" because they were initially only available on projects, which is
not the case anymore.
We decided to change the naming from "services" and "project services" to "integrations".
This refactoring is an ongoing effort, and there are still references to the old names in some places.
Developers should be especially aware that we still use the old class names for the STI column
`integrations.type` . For example, a class `Integrations::FooBar` still stores
the old name `FooBarService` in the database. This mapping is handled via `Gitlab::Integrations::StiType`
and should be mostly transparent to the rest of the app.
### [Consolidate integration settings](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/3955)
We want to unify the way integration properties are defined.
## Integration examples
You can refer to these issues for examples of adding new integrations:
- [Datadog ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/270123 ): Metrics collector, similar to the Prometheus integration.
- [EWM/RTC ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/36662 ): External issue tracker.
- [Shimo ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/343386 ): External wiki, similar to the Confluence and External Wiki integrations.
- [Webex Teams ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/31543 ): Chat notifications.
- [ZenTao ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/338178 ): External issue tracker with custom issue views, similar to the Jira integration.
