info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
The answer can be simplified to: less maintenance required. Instead of handling
multiple packages that *can* break existing functionality if the versions are
not compatible, only handle one.
Multiple packages require correct configuration in multiple locations.
Keeping configuration in sync can be error prone.
If you have the skill set to maintain all current dependencies and enough time
to handle any future dependencies that might get introduced, the above listed
reasons might not be good enough for you to not use the omnibus package.
There are two things to keep in mind before going down this route:
1. Getting support for any problems
you encounter might be more difficult due to the number of possibilities that exist
when using a library version that is not tested by majority of users.
1. Omnibus package also allows shutting off of any services that you do not need,
if you need to run a component independently. For example, you can use a
[non-bundled PostgreSQL database](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/database.html#using-a-non-packaged-postgresql-database-management-server) with the omnibus package.
Keep in mind that a non-standard solution like the omnibus package
might be a better fit when the application has a number of moving parts.
## Docker image with multiple services
[GitLab Docker image](../../install/docker.md#gitlab-docker-images) is based on the omnibus package.
Considering that container spawned from this image contains multiple processes,
these types of containers are also referred to as 'fat containers'.
There are reasons for and against an image like this, but they are similar to
what was noted above:
1. Very simple to get started.
1. Upgrading to the latest version is extremely simple.
1. Running separate services in multiple containers and keeping them running
can be more complex and might not be required for a given install.
This method is useful for organizations just getting started with containers and schedulers, and may not be ready for a more complex installation. This method is a great introduction, and works well for smaller organizations.