2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
# Presenters
This type of class is responsible for giving the view an object which defines
**view-related logic/data methods**. It is usually useful to extract such
methods from models to presenters.
## When to use a presenter?
### When your view is full of logic
2020-05-24 23:13:21 +05:30
When your view is full of logic (`if`, `else` , `select` on arrays, etc.), it's
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
time to create a presenter!
### When your model has a lot of view-related logic/data methods
When your model has a lot of view-related logic/data methods, you can easily
move them to a presenter.
## Why are we using presenters instead of helpers?
We don't use presenters to generate complex view output that would rely on helpers.
Presenters should be used for:
- Data and logic methods that can be pulled & combined into single methods from
view. This can include loops extracted from views too. A good example is
2019-12-04 20:38:33 +05:30
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/merge_requests/7073/diffs.
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
- Data and logic methods that can be pulled from models.
- Simple text output methods: it's ok if the method returns a string, but not a
2020-05-24 23:13:21 +05:30
whole DOM element for which we'd need HAML, a view context, helpers, etc.
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
## Why use presenters instead of model concerns?
2020-05-24 23:13:21 +05:30
We should strive to follow the single-responsibility principle and view-related
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
logic/data methods are definitely not the responsibility of models!
Another reason is as follows:
> Avoid using concerns and use presenters instead. Why? After all, concerns seem
to be a core part of Rails and can DRY up code when shared among multiple models.
Nonetheless, the main issue is that concerns don’ t make the model object more
cohesive. The code is just better organized. In other words, there’ s no real
change to the API of the model.
– https://www.toptal.com/ruby-on-rails/decoupling-rails-components
## Benefits
By moving pure view-related logic/data methods from models & views to presenters,
we gain the following benefits:
- rules are more explicit and centralized in the presenter => improves security
- testing is easier and faster as presenters are Plain Old Ruby Object (PORO)
- views are more readable and maintainable
2020-05-24 23:13:21 +05:30
- decreases the number of CE -> EE merge conflicts since code is in separate files
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
- moves the conflicts from views (not always obvious) to presenters (a lot easier to resolve)
## What not to do with presenters?
- Don't use helpers in presenters. Presenters are not aware of the view context.
2020-05-24 23:13:21 +05:30
- Don't generate complex DOM elements, forms, etc. with presenters. Presenters
can return simple data like texts, and URLs using URL helpers from
`Gitlab::Routing` but nothing much fancier.
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
## Implementation
### Presenter definition
2021-11-18 22:05:49 +05:30
If you need a presenter class that has only necessary interfaces for the view-related context,
inherit from `Gitlab::View::Presenter::Simple` .
It provides a `.presents` the method which allows you to define an accessor for the
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
presented object. It also includes common helpers like `Gitlab::Routing` and
`Gitlab::Allowable` .
```ruby
class LabelPresenter < Gitlab::View::Presenter::Simple
2021-11-18 22:05:49 +05:30
presents ::Label, as: :label
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
def text_color
label.color.to_s
end
def to_partial_path
'projects/labels/show'
end
end
```
2021-11-18 22:05:49 +05:30
If you need a presenter class that delegates missing method calls to the presented object,
inherit from `Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated` .
This is more like an "extension" in the sense that the produced object is going to have
all of interfaces of the presented object **AND** all of the interfaces in the presenter class:
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
```ruby
class LabelPresenter < Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated
2021-11-18 22:05:49 +05:30
presents ::Label, as: :label
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
def text_color
# color is delegated to label
color.to_s
end
def to_partial_path
'projects/labels/show'
end
end
```
### Presenter instantiation
Instantiation must be done via the `Gitlab::View::Presenter::Factory` class which
detects the presenter based on the presented subject's class.
```ruby
class Projects::LabelsController < Projects::ApplicationController
def edit
@label = Gitlab::View::Presenter::Factory
.new(@label, current_user: current_user)
.fabricate!
end
end
```
You can also include the `Presentable` concern in the model:
```ruby
class Label
include Presentable
end
```
and then in the controller:
```ruby
class Projects::LabelsController < Projects::ApplicationController
def edit
@label = @label .present(current_user: current_user)
end
end
```
### Presenter usage
```ruby
%div{ class: @label .text_color }
= render partial: @label , label: @label
```
You can also present the model in the view:
```ruby
- label = @label .present(current_user: current_user)
%div{ class: label.text_color }
= render partial: label, label: label
```
2021-11-18 22:05:49 +05:30
### Validate accidental overrides
We use presenters in many places, such as Controller, Haml, GraphQL/Rest API,
it's very handy to extend the core/backend logic of Active Record models,
however, there is a risk that it accidentally overrides important logic.
For example, [this production incident ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/production/-/issues/5498 )
was caused by [including `ActionView::Helpers::UrlHelper` in a presenter ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/69537/diffs#4b581cff00ef3cc9780efd23682af383de302e7d_3_3 ).
The `tag` accesor in `Ci::Build` was accidentally overridden by `ActionView::Helpers::TagHelper#tag` ,
and as a conseuqence, a wrong `tag` value was persited into database.
Starting from GitLab 14.4, we validate the presenters (specifically all of the subclasses of `Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated` )
that they do not accidentally override core/backend logic. In such case, a pipeline in merge requests fails with an error message,
here is an example:
```plaintext
We've detected that a presetner is overriding a specific method(s) on a subject model.
There is a risk that it accidentally modifies the backend/core logic that leads to production incident.
Please follow https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/presenters/README.md#validate-accidental-overrides
to resolve this error with caution.
Here are the conflict details.
- Ci::PipelinePresenter#tag is overriding Ci::Pipeline#tag. delegator_location: /devkitkat/services/rails/cache/ruby/2.7.0/gems/actionview-6.1.3.2/lib/action_view/helpers/tag_helper.rb:271 original_location: /devkitkat/services/rails/cache/ruby/2.7.0/gems/activemodel-6.1.3.2/lib/active_model/attribute_methods.rb:254
```
Here are the potential solutions:
- If the conflict happens on an instance method in the presenter:
- If you intend to override the core/backend logic, define `delegator_override <method-name>` on top of the conflicted method.
This explicitly adds the method to an allowlist.
- If you do NOT intend to override the core/backend logic, rename the method name in the presenter.
- If the conflict happens on an included module in the presenter, remove the module from the presenter and find a workaround.
### How to use the `Gitlab::Utils::DelegatorOverride` validator
If a presenter class inhertis from `Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated` ,
you should define what object class is presented:
```ruby
class WebHookLogPresenter < Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated
presents ::WebHookLog, as: :web_hook_log # This defines that the presenter presents `WebHookLog` Active Record model.
```
These presenters are validated not to accidentaly override the methods in the presented object.
You can run the validation locally with:
```shell
bundle exec rake lint:static_verification
```
To add a method to an allowlist, use `delegator_override` . For example:
```ruby
class VulnerabilityPresenter < Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated
presents ::Vulnerability, as: :vulnerability
delegator_override :description # This adds the `description` method to an allowlist that the override is intentional.
def description
vulnerability.description || finding.description
end
```
To add methods of a module to an allowlist, use `delegator_override_with` . For example:
```ruby
module Ci
class PipelinePresenter < Gitlab::View::Presenter::Delegated
include Gitlab::Utils::StrongMemoize
include ActionView::Helpers::UrlHelper
delegator_override_with Gitlab::Utils::StrongMemoize # TODO: Remove `Gitlab::Utils::StrongMemoize` inclusion as it's duplicate
delegator_override_with ActionView::Helpers::TagHelper # TODO: Remove `ActionView::Helpers::UrlHelper` inclusion as it overrides `Ci::Pipeline#tag`
```
Keep in mind that if you use `delegator_override_with` ,
there is a high chance that you're doing **something wrong** .
Read the [Validate Accidental Overrides ](#validate-accidental-overrides ) for more information.