info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
---
# Usage Ping Guide
> Introduced in GitLab Ultimate 11.2, more statistics.
This guide describes Usage Ping's purpose and how it's implemented.
For more information about Product Intelligence, see:
- GitLab sends a weekly payload containing usage data to GitLab Inc. Usage Ping provides high-level data to help our product, support, and sales teams. It does not send any project names, usernames, or any other specific data. The information from the usage ping is not anonymous, it is linked to the hostname of the instance. Sending usage ping is optional, and any instance can disable analytics.
- The usage data is primarily composed of row counts for different tables in the instance's database. By comparing these counts month over month (or week over week), we can get a rough sense for how an instance is using the different features in the product. In addition to counts, other facts
that help us classify and understand GitLab installations are collected.
- Usage ping is important to GitLab as we use it to calculate our Stage Monthly Active Users (SMAU) which helps us measure the success of our stages and features.
- While usage ping is enabled, GitLab gathers data from the other instances and can show usage statistics of your instance to your users.
### Why should we enable Usage Ping?
- The main purpose of Usage Ping is to build a better GitLab. Data about how GitLab is used is collected to better understand feature/stage adoption and usage, which helps us understand how GitLab is adding value and helps our team better understand the reasons why people use GitLab and with this knowledge we're able to make better product decisions.
- As a benefit of having the usage ping active, GitLab lets you analyze the users' activities over time of your GitLab installation.
- As a benefit of having the usage ping active, GitLab provides you with The DevOps Report,which gives you an overview of your entire instance's adoption of Concurrent DevOps from planning to monitoring.
- You get better, more proactive support. (assuming that our TAMs and support organization used the data to deliver more value)
- You get insight and advice into how to get the most value out of your investment in GitLab. Wouldn't you want to know that a number of features or values are not being adopted in your organization?
- You get a report that illustrates how you compare against other similar organizations (anonymized), with specific advice and recommendations on how to improve your DevOps processes.
- Usage Ping is enabled by default. To disable it, see [Disable Usage Ping](#disable-usage-ping).
### Limitations
- Usage Ping does not track frontend events things like page views, link clicks, or user sessions, and only focuses on aggregated backend events.
- Because of these limitations we recommend instrumenting your products with Snowplow for more detailed analytics on GitLab.com and use Usage Ping to track aggregated backend events on self-managed.
## Usage Ping payload
You can view the exact JSON payload sent to GitLab Inc. in the administration panel. To view the payload:
Source installations can set the following in `gitlab.yml`:
```yaml
production: &base
# ...
gitlab:
# ...
usage_ping_enabled: false
```
## Usage Ping request flow
The following example shows a basic request/response flow between a GitLab instance, the Versions Application, the License Application, Salesforce, the GitLab S3 Bucket, the GitLab Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Sisense:
Snowflake DW->>Snowflake DW: Transform data using dbt
Snowflake DW->>Sisense Dashboards: Data available for querying
Versions Application->>GitLab Instance: DevOps Report (Conversational Development Index)
```
## How Usage Ping works
1. The Usage Ping [cron job](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/workers/gitlab_usage_ping_worker.rb#L30) is set in Sidekiq to run weekly.
1. When the cron job runs, it calls [`Gitlab::UsageData.to_json`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb#L22).
1.`Gitlab::UsageData.to_json` [cascades down](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data.rb#L22) to ~400+ other counter method calls.
1. The response of all methods calls are [merged together](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data.rb#L14) into a single JSON payload in `Gitlab::UsageData.to_json`.
1. The JSON payload is then [posted to the Versions application]( https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb#L20)
If a firewall exception is needed, the required URL depends on several things. If
the hostname is `version.gitlab.com`, the protocol is `TCP`, and the port number is `443`,
the required URL is <https://version.gitlab.com/>.
## Usage Ping Metric Life cycle
### 1. New metrics addition
Please follow the [Implementing Usage Ping](#implementing-usage-ping) guide.
### 2. Existing metric change
Because we do not control when customers update their self-managed instances of GitLab,
we **STRONGLY DISCOURAGE** changes to the logic used to calculate any metric.
Any such changes lead to inconsistent reports from multiple GitLab instances.
If there is a problem with an existing metric, it's best to deprecate the existing metric,
and use it, side by side, with the desired new metric.
Example:
Consider following change. Before GitLab 12.6, the `example_metric` was implemented as:
If a metric is obsolete and you no longer use it, you can mark it as deprecated.
For an example of the metric deprecation process take a look at this [example merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/59899)
To deprecate a metric:
1. Check the following YAML files and verify the metric is not used in an aggregate:
endpoint, and assure that test suite does not fail when metric that you wish to remove is not included into test payload.
1. Create an issue in the
[GitLab Data Team project](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/analytics/-/issues).
Ask for confirmation that the metric is not referred to in any SiSense dashboards and
can be safely removed from Usage Ping. Use this
[example issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/analytics/-/issues/7539) for guidance.
This step can be skipped if verification done during [deprecation process](#3-deprecate-a-metric)
reported that metric is not required by any data transformation in Snowflake data warehouse nor it is
used by any of SiSense dashboards.
1. After you verify the metric can be safely removed,
update the attributes of the metric's YAML definition:
- Set the `status:` to `removed`.
- Set `milestone_removed:` to the number of the
milestone in which the metric was removed.
Do not remove the metric's YAML definition altogether. Some self-managed
instances might not immediately update to the latest version of GitLab, and
therefore continue to report the removed metric. The Product Intelligence team
requires a record of all removed metrics in order to identify and filter them.
For example please take a look at this [merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/60149/diffs#b01f429a54843feb22265100c0e4fec1b7da1240_10_10).
1. After you verify the metric can be safely removed,
For example please take a look at this [merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/60149/diffs#6335dc533bd21df26db9de90a02dd66278c2390d_167_167).
1. Remove any other records related to the metric:
- The feature flag YAML file at [`config/feature_flags/*/*.yaml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/config/feature_flags).
- The entry in the known events YAML file at [`lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/*.yaml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events).
1. Update the Metrics Dictionary following [guidelines instructions](dictionary.md).
Usage Ping consists of two kinds of data, counters and observations. Counters track how often a certain event
happened over time, such as how many CI pipelines have run. They are monotonic and always trend up.
Observations are facts collected from one or more GitLab instances and can carry arbitrary data. There are no
general guidelines around how to collect those, due to the individual nature of that data.
There are several types of counters which are all found in `usage_data.rb`:
- **Ordinary Batch Counters:** Simple count of a given ActiveRecord_Relation
- **Distinct Batch Counters:** Distinct count of a given ActiveRecord_Relation in a given column
- **Sum Batch Counters:** Sum the values of a given ActiveRecord_Relation in a given column
- **Alternative Counters:** Used for settings and configurations
- **Redis Counters:** Used for in-memory counts.
NOTE:
Only use the provided counter methods. Each counter method contains a built in fail safe to isolate each counter to avoid breaking the entire Usage Ping.
### Why batch counting
For large tables, PostgreSQL can take a long time to count rows due to MVCC [(Multi-version Concurrency Control)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiversion_concurrency_control). Batch counting is a counting method where a single large query is broken into multiple smaller queries. For example, instead of a single query querying 1,000,000 records, with batch counting, you can execute 100 queries of 10,000 records each. Batch counting is useful for avoiding database timeouts as each batch query is significantly shorter than one single long running query.
For GitLab.com, there are extremely large tables with 15 second query timeouts, so we use batch counting to avoid encountering timeouts. Here are the sizes of some GitLab.com tables:
-`relation` the ActiveRecord_Relation to perform the count
-`column` the column to perform the distinct count, by default is the primary key
-`batch`: default `true` to use batch counting
-`batch_size`: if none set it uses default value 10000 from `Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter`
-`start`: custom start of the batch counting to avoid complex min calculations
-`end`: custom end of the batch counting to avoid complex min calculations
WARNING:
Counting over non-unique columns can lead to performance issues. Take a look at the [iterating tables in batches](../iterating_tables_in_batches.md) guide for more details.
Handles `::Redis::CommandError` and `Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::BaseCounter::UnknownEvent`
returns -1 when a block is sent or hash with all values -1 when a `counter(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters)` is sent
different behavior due to 2 different implementations of Redis counter
Method: `redis_usage_data(counter, &block)`
Arguments:
-`counter`: a counter from `Gitlab::UsageDataCounters`, that has `fallback_totals` method implemented
- or a `block`: which is evaluated
#### Ordinary Redis Counters
Examples of implementation:
- Using Redis methods [`INCR`](https://redis.io/commands/incr), [`GET`](https://redis.io/commands/get), and [`Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::WikiPageCounter`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/wiki_page_counter.rb)
- Using Redis methods [`HINCRBY`](https://redis.io/commands/hincrby), [`HGETALL`](https://redis.io/commands/hgetall), and [`Gitlab::UsageCounters::PodLogs`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_counters/pod_logs.rb)
##### UsageData API Tracking
<!-- There's nearly identical content in `##### Adding new events`. If you fix errors here, you may need to fix the same errors in the other location. -->
1. Track event using `UsageData` API
Increment event count using ordinary Redis counter, for given event name.
Tracking events using the `UsageData` API requires the `usage_data_api` feature flag to be enabled, which is enabled by default.
API requests are protected by checking for a valid CSRF token.
To be able to increment the values, the related feature `usage_data_<event_name>` should be enabled.
```plaintext
POST /usage_data/increment_counter
```
| Attribute | Type | Required | Description |
| :-------- | :--- | :------- | :---------- |
| `event` | string | yes | The event name it should be tracked |
Response
-`200` if event was tracked
-`400 Bad request` if event parameter is missing
-`401 Unauthorized` if user is not authenticated
-`403 Forbidden` for invalid CSRF token provided
1. Track events using JavaScript/Vue API helper which calls the API above
Note that `usage_data_api` and `usage_data_#{event_name}` should be enabled to be able to track events
HyperLogLog (HLL) is a probabilistic algorithm and its **results always includes some small error**. According to [Redis documentation](https://redis.io/commands/pfcount), data from
used HLL implementation is "approximated with a standard error of 0.81%".
With `Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter` we have available data structures used to count unique values.
Implemented using Redis methods [PFADD](https://redis.io/commands/pfadd) and [PFCOUNT](https://redis.io/commands/pfcount).
##### Adding new events
1. Define events in [`known_events`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/).
-`feature_flag`: optional `default_enabled: :yaml`. If no feature flag is set then the tracking is enabled. One feature flag can be used for multiple events. For details, see our [GitLab internal Feature flags](../feature_flags/index.md) documentation. The feature flags are owned by the group adding the event tracking.
1. Track event using `track_usage_event(event_name, values)` in services and GraphQL
Increment unique values count using Redis HLL, for given event name.
Example:
[Track usage event for incident created in service](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v13.8.3-ee/app/services/issues/update_service.rb#L66)
[Track usage event for incident created in GraphQL](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v13.8.3-ee/app/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status.rb#L16)
<!-- There's nearly identical content in `##### UsageData API Tracking`. If you find / fix errors here, you may need to fix errors in that section too. -->
1. Track event using `UsageData` API
Increment unique users count using Redis HLL, for given event name.
Tracking events using the `UsageData` API requires the `usage_data_api` feature flag to be enabled, which is enabled by default.
API requests are protected by checking for a valid CSRF token.
```plaintext
POST /usage_data/increment_unique_users
```
| Attribute | Type | Required | Description |
| :-------- | :--- | :------- | :---------- |
| `event` | string | yes | The event name it should be tracked |
Response
Return 200 if tracking failed for any reason.
-`200` if event was tracked or any errors
-`400 Bad request` if event parameter is missing
-`401 Unauthorized` if user is not authenticated
-`403 Forbidden` for invalid CSRF token provided
1. Track events using JavaScript/Vue API helper which calls the API above
Example usage for an existing event already defined in [known events](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/):
Usage Data API is behind `usage_data_api` feature flag which, as of GitLab 13.7, is
For a full list of events and corresponding feature flags see, [known_events](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/) files.
To enable or disable tracking for specific event in <https://gitlab.com> or <https://about.staging.gitlab.com>, run commands such as the following to
[enable or disable the corresponding feature](../feature_flags/index.md).
##### Known events are added automatically in usage data payload
All events added in [`known_events/common.yml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/common.yml) are automatically added to usage data generation under the `redis_hll_counters` key. This column is stored in [version-app as a JSON](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/db/schema.rb#L209).
For each event we add metrics for the weekly and monthly time frames, and totals for each where applicable:
-`#{event_name}_weekly`: Data for 7 days for daily [aggregation](#adding-new-events) events and data for the last complete week for weekly [aggregation](#adding-new-events) events.
-`#{event_name}_monthly`: Data for 28 days for daily [aggregation](#adding-new-events) events and data for the last 4 complete weeks for weekly [aggregation](#adding-new-events) events.
Redis HLL implementation calculates automatic total metrics, if there are more than one metric for the same category, aggregation, and Redis slot.
-`#{category}_total_unique_counts_weekly`: Total unique counts for events in the same category for the last 7 days or the last complete week, if events are in the same Redis slot and we have more than one metric.
-`#{category}_total_unique_counts_monthly`: Total unique counts for events in same category for the last 28 days or the last 4 complete weeks, if events are in the same Redis slot and we have more than one metric.
Your Rails console returns the generated SQL queries.
Example:
```ruby
pry(main)> Gitlab::UsageData.count(User.active)
(2.6ms) SELECT "features"."key" FROM "features"
(15.3ms) SELECT MIN("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
(2.4ms) SELECT MAX("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
(1.9ms) SELECT COUNT("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4)) AND "users"."id" BETWEEN 1 AND 100000
```
### 4. Optimize queries with #database-lab
Paste the SQL query into `#database-lab` to see how the query performs at scale.
-`#database-lab` is a Slack channel which uses a production-sized environment to test your queries.
- Any single query must stay below [1 second execution time](../query_performance.md#timing-guidelines-for-queries) with cold caches.
- Add a specialized index on columns involved to reduce the execution time.
To have an understanding of the query's execution we add in the MR description the following information:
- For counters that have a `time_period` test we add information for both cases:
-`time_period = {}` for all time periods
-`time_period = { created_at: 28.days.ago..Time.current }` for last 28 days period
- Execution plan and query time before and after optimization
- Query generated for the index and time
- Migration output for up and down execution
We also use `#database-lab` and [explain.depesz.com](https://explain.depesz.com/). For more details, see the [database review guide](../database_review.md#preparation-when-adding-or-modifying-queries).
#### Optimization recommendations and examples
- Use specialized indexes [example 1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/26871), [example 2](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/26445).
- Use defined `start` and `finish`, and simple queries. These values can be memoized and reused, [example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/37155).
- Avoid joins and write the queries as simply as possible, [example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/36316).
- Set a custom `batch_size` for `distinct_count`, [example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/38000).
When adding, updating, or removing metrics, please update the [Metrics Dictionary](dictionary.md).
### 6. Add new metric to Versions Application
Check if new metrics need to be added to the Versions Application. See `usage_data` [schema](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/db/schema.rb#L147) and usage data [parameters accepted](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/app/services/usage_ping.rb). Any metrics added under the `counts` key are saved in the `stats` column.
### 7. Add the feature label
Add the `feature` label to the Merge Request for new Usage Ping metrics. These are user-facing changes and are part of expanding the Usage Ping feature.
### 8. Add a changelog file
Ensure you comply with the [Changelog entries guide](../changelog.md).
### 9. Ask for a Product Intelligence Review
On GitLab.com, we have DangerBot setup to monitor Product Intelligence related files and DangerBot recommends a [Product Intelligence review](product_intelligence_review.md). Mention `@gitlab-org/growth/product_intelligence/engineers` in your MR for a review.
On GitLab.com, the Product Intelligence team regularly [monitors Usage Ping](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/6000).
They may alert you that your metrics need further optimization to run quicker and with greater success.
The Usage Ping JSON payload for GitLab.com is shared in the
[#g_product_intelligence](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CL3A7GFPF) Slack channel every week.
You may also use the [Usage Ping QA dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/632033/Usage-Ping-QA) to check how well your metric performs. The dashboard allows filtering by GitLab version, by "Self-managed" & "SaaS" and shows you how many failures have occurred for each metric. Whenever you notice a high failure rate, you may re-optimize your metric.
1. Clone and start [GitLab](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit).
1. Clone and start [Versions Application](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com).
Make sure to run `docker-compose up` to start a PostgreSQL and Redis instance.
1. Point GitLab to the Versions Application endpoint instead of the default endpoint:
1. Open [submit_usage_ping_service.rb](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb#L4) in your local and modified `PRODUCTION_URL`.
1. Set it to the local Versions Application URL `http://localhost:3000/usage_data`.
#### Test local setup
1. Using the `gitlab` Rails console, manually trigger a usage ping:
```ruby
SubmitUsagePingService.new.execute
```
1. Use the `versions` Rails console to check the usage ping was successfully received,
parsed, and stored in the Versions database:
```ruby
UsageData.last
```
### Test Prometheus-based usage ping
If the data submitted includes metrics [queried from Prometheus](#prometheus-queries)
you want to inspect and verify, you must:
- Ensure that a Prometheus server is running locally.
- Ensure the respective GitLab components are exporting metrics to the Prometheus server.
If you do not need to test data coming from Prometheus, no further action
This is the recommended approach to test Prometheus based Usage Ping.
The easiest way to verify your changes is to build a new Omnibus image from your code branch by using CI, then download the image
and run a local container instance:
1. From your merge request, click on the `qa` stage, then trigger the `package-and-qa` job. This job triggers an Omnibus
build in a [downstream pipeline of the `omnibus-gitlab-mirror` project](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/-/pipelines).
1. In the downstream pipeline, wait for the `gitlab-docker` job to finish.
1. Open the job logs and locate the full container name including the version. It takes the following form: `registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/gitlab-ee:<VERSION>`.
1. On your local machine, make sure you are signed in to the GitLab Docker registry. You can find the instructions for this in
[Authenticate to the GitLab Container Registry](../../user/packages/container_registry/index.md#authenticate-with-the-container-registry).
1. Once signed in, download the new image by using `docker pull registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/gitlab-ee:<VERSION>`
1. For more information about working with and running Omnibus GitLab containers in Docker, please refer to [GitLab Docker images](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/docker/README.html) in the Omnibus documentation.
#### Test with GitLab development toolkits
This is the less recommended approach, because it comes with a number of difficulties when emulating a real GitLab deployment.
The [GDK](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit) is not set up to run a Prometheus server or `node_exporter` alongside other GitLab components. If you would
like to do so, [Monitoring the GDK with Prometheus](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/-/blob/main/doc/howto/prometheus/index.md#monitoring-the-gdk-with-prometheus) is a good start.
The [GCK](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-compose-kit) has limited support for testing Prometheus based Usage Ping.
By default, it already comes with a fully configured Prometheus service that is set up to scrape a number of components,
but with the following limitations:
- It does not run a `gitlab-exporter` instance, so several `process_*` metrics from services such as Gitaly may be missing.
- While it runs a `node_exporter`, `docker-compose` services emulate hosts, meaning that it would normally report itself to not be associated
with any of the other services that are running. That is not how node metrics are reported in a production setup, where `node_exporter`
always runs as a process alongside other GitLab components on any given node. From Usage Ping's perspective none of the node data would therefore
appear to be associated to any of the services running, because they all appear to be running on different hosts. To alleviate this problem, the `node_exporter` in GCK was arbitrarily "assigned" to the `web` service, meaning only for this service `node_*` metrics appears in Usage Ping.
## Aggregated metrics
> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/45979) in GitLab 13.6.
WARNING:
This feature is intended solely for internal GitLab use.
To add data for aggregated metrics into Usage Ping payload you should add corresponding definition at [`config/metrics/aggregates/*.yaml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/config/metrics/aggregates/) for metrics available at Community Edition and at [`ee/config/metrics/aggregates/*.yaml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/config/metrics/aggregates/) for Enterprise Edition ones.
Each aggregate definition includes following parts:
-`name`: Unique name under which the aggregate metric is added to the Usage Ping payload.
-`operator`: Operator that defines how the aggregated metric data is counted. Available operators are:
-`OR`: Removes duplicates and counts all entries that triggered any of listed events.
-`AND`: Removes duplicates and counts all elements that were observed triggering all of following events.
-`time_frame`: One or more valid time frames. Use these to limit the data included in aggregated metric to events within a specific date-range. Valid time frames are:
-`7d`: Last seven days of data.
-`28d`: Last twenty eight days of data.
-`all`: All historical data, only available for `database` sourced aggregated metrics.
-`source`: Data source used to collect all events data included in aggregated metric. Valid data sources are:
Aggregated metrics collected in `7d` and `28d` time frames are added into Usage Ping payload under the `aggregated_metrics` sub-key in the `counts_weekly` and `counts_monthly` top level keys.
To declare the aggregate of metrics collected with [Estimated Batch Counters](#estimated-batch-counters),
you must fulfill the following requirements:
- Metrics names listed in the `events:` attribute, have to use the same names you passed in the `metric_name` argument while persisting metrics in previous step.
- Every metric listed in the `events:` attribute, has to be persisted for **every** selected `time_frame:` value.
In GitLab 13.5, `pg_system_id` was added to send the [PostgreSQL system identifier](https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/support-for-postgresqls-system-identifier-in-barman/).
## Exporting Usage Ping SQL queries and definitions
Two Rake tasks exist to export Usage Ping definitions.
- The Rake tasks export the raw SQL queries for `count`, `distinct_count`, `sum`.
- The Rake tasks export the Redis counter class or the line of the Redis block for `redis_usage_data`.
- The Rake tasks calculate the `alt_usage_data` metrics.
In the home directory of your local GitLab installation run the following Rake tasks for the YAML and JSON versions respectively:
