info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
- **[Redis counters](#redis-counters):** Used for in-memory counts.
- **[Alternative counters](#alternative-counters):** Used for settings and configurations.
NOTE:
Only use the provided counter methods. Each counter method contains a built-in fail-safe mechanism that isolates each counter to avoid breaking the entire Service Ping process.
### Batch counters
For large tables, PostgreSQL can take a long time to count rows due to MVCC [(Multi-version Concurrency Control)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiversion_concurrency_control). Batch counting is a counting method where a single large query is broken into multiple smaller queries. For example, instead of a single query querying 1,000,000 records, with batch counting, you can execute 100 queries of 10,000 records each. Batch counting is useful for avoiding database timeouts as each batch query is significantly shorter than one single long running query.
For GitLab.com, there are extremely large tables with 15 second query timeouts, so we use batch counting to avoid encountering timeouts. Here are the sizes of some GitLab.com tables:
Create a new [database metrics](metrics_instrumentation.md#database-metrics) instrumentation class with `count` operation for a given `ActiveRecord_Relation`
Create a new [database metrics](metrics_instrumentation.md#database-metrics) instrumentation class with `distinct_count` operation for a given `ActiveRecord_Relation`.
Counting over non-unique columns can lead to performance issues. For more information, see the [iterating tables in batches](../database/iterating_tables_in_batches.md) guide.
Example of implementation: [`Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::WikiPageCounter`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/wiki_page_counter.rb), using Redis methods [`INCR`](https://redis.io/commands/incr/) and [`GET`](https://redis.io/commands/get/).
Events are handled by counter classes in the `Gitlab::UsageDataCounters` namespace, inheriting from `BaseCounter`, that are either:
1. Listed in [`Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::COUNTERS`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters.rb#L5) to be then included in `Gitlab::UsageData`.
1. Specified in the metric definition using the `RedisMetric` instrumentation class by their `prefix` option to be picked up using the [metric instrumentation](metrics_instrumentation.md) framework. Refer to the [Redis metrics](metrics_instrumentation.md#redis-metrics) documentation for an example implementation.
Inheriting classes are expected to override `KNOWN_EVENTS` and `PREFIX` constants to build event names and associated metrics. For example, for prefix `issues` and events array `%w[create, update, delete]`, three metrics will be added to the Service Ping payload: `counts.issues_create`, `counts.issues_update` and `counts.issues_delete`.
HyperLogLog (HLL) is a probabilistic algorithm and its **results always includes some small error**. According to [Redis documentation](https://redis.io/commands/pfcount/), data from
A user's consent for `usage_stats` (`User.single_user&.requires_usage_stats_consent?`) is not checked during the data tracking stage due to performance reasons. Keys corresponding to those counters are present in Redis even if `usage_stats_consent` is still required. However, no metric is collected from Redis and reported back to GitLab as long as `usage_stats_consent` is required.
-`feature_flag`: if no feature flag is set then the tracking is enabled. One feature flag can be used for multiple events. For details, see our [GitLab internal Feature flags](../feature_flags/index.md) documentation. The feature flags are owned by the group adding the event tracking.
- Using `track_usage_event(event_name, values)` in services and GraphQL.
Increment unique values count using Redis HLL, for a given event name.
Examples:
- [Track usage event for an incident in a service](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v13.8.3-ee/app/services/issues/update_service.rb#L66)
- [Track usage event for an incident in GraphQL](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v13.8.3-ee/app/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status.rb#L16)
Example for an existing event already defined in [known events](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/):
For a full list of events and corresponding feature flags, see the [`known_events/`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events/) files.
Service Ping adds all events [`known_events/*.yml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/known_events) to Service Data generation under the `redis_hll_counters` key. This column is stored in [version-app as a JSON](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/db/schema.rb#L209).
For each event we add metrics for the weekly and monthly time frames, and totals for each where applicable:
-`#{event_name}_weekly`: Data for 7 days for daily [aggregation](#add-new-events) events and data for the last complete week for weekly [aggregation](#add-new-events) events.
-`#{event_name}_monthly`: Data for 28 days for daily [aggregation](#add-new-events) events and data for the last 4 complete weeks for weekly [aggregation](#add-new-events) events.
Redis HLL implementation calculates total metrics when both of these conditions are met:
- The category is manually included in [CATEGORIES_FOR_TOTALS](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/hll_redis_counter.rb#L21).
- There is more than one metric for the same category, aggregation, and Redis slot.
We add total unique counts for the weekly and monthly time frames where applicable:
-`#{category}_total_unique_counts_weekly`: Total unique counts for events in the same category for the last 7 days or the last complete week, if events are in the same Redis slot and we have more than one metric.
-`#{category}_total_unique_counts_monthly`: Total unique counts for events in same category for the last 28 days or the last 4 complete weeks, if events are in the same Redis slot and we have more than one metric.
Your Rails console returns the generated SQL queries. For example:
```ruby
pry(main)> Gitlab::UsageData.count(User.active)
(2.6ms) SELECT "features"."key" FROM "features"
(15.3ms) SELECT MIN("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
(2.4ms) SELECT MAX("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4))
(1.9ms) SELECT COUNT("users"."id") FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."state" IN ('active')) AND ("users"."user_type" IS NULL OR "users"."user_type" IN (6, 4)) AND "users"."id" BETWEEN 1 AND 100000
```
## Optimize queries with `#database-lab`
`#database-lab` is a Slack channel that uses a production-sized environment to test your queries.
Paste the SQL query into `#database-lab` to see how the query performs at scale.
- GitLab.com's production database has a 15 second timeout.
- Add a specialized index on columns involved to reduce the execution time.
To understand the query's execution, we add the following information
to a merge request description:
- For counters that have a `time_period` test, we add information for both:
-`time_period = {}` for all time periods.
-`time_period = { created_at: 28.days.ago..Time.current }` for the last 28 days.
- Execution plan and query time before and after optimization.
- Query generated for the index and time.
- Migration output for up and down execution.
We also use `#database-lab` and [explain.depesz.com](https://explain.depesz.com/). For more details, see the [database review guide](../database_review.md#preparation-when-adding-or-modifying-queries).
### Optimization recommendations and examples
- Use specialized indexes. For examples, see these merge requests:
- Set a custom `batch_size` for `distinct_count`, as in this [example merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/38000).
## Add the metric definition
See the [Metrics Dictionary guide](metrics_dictionary.md) for more information.
## Add the metric to the Versions Application
Check if the new metric must be added to the Versions Application. See the `usage_data` [schema](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/db/schema.rb#L147) and Service Data [parameters accepted](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-services/version-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/app/services/usage_ping.rb). Any metrics added under the `counts` key are saved in the `stats` column.
## Create a merge request
Create a merge request for the new Service Ping metric, and do the following:
- Add the `feature` label to the merge request. A metric is a user-facing change and is part of expanding the Service Ping feature.
- Add a changelog entry that complies with the [changelog entries guide](../changelog.md).
- Ask for a Product Intelligence review.
On GitLab.com, we have DangerBot set up to monitor Product Intelligence related files and recommend a [Product Intelligence review](review_guidelines.md).
## Verify your metric
On GitLab.com, the Product Intelligence team regularly [monitors Service Ping](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/6000).
They may alert you that your metrics need further optimization to run quicker and with greater success.
The Service Ping JSON payload for GitLab.com is shared in the
[#g_product_intelligence](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CL3A7GFPF) Slack channel every week.
You may also use the [Service Ping QA dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/632033/Usage-Ping-QA) to check how well your metric performs.
The dashboard allows filtering by GitLab version, by "Self-managed" and "SaaS", and shows you how many failures have occurred for each metric. Whenever you notice a high failure rate, you can re-optimize your metric.
Use [Metrics Dictionary](https://metrics.gitlab.com/) [copy query to clipboard feature](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4o65ivta48&list=PL05JrBw4t0Krg3mbR6chU7pXtMt_es6Pb) to get a query ready to run in Sisense for a specific metric.
1. Open [service_ping/submit_service.rb](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/service_ping/submit_service.rb#L5) locally and modify `STAGING_BASE_URL`.
build in a [downstream pipeline of the `omnibus-gitlab-mirror` project](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/-/pipelines).
1. In the downstream pipeline, wait for the `gitlab-docker` job to finish.
1. Open the job logs and locate the full container name including the version. It takes the following form: `registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/gitlab-ee:<VERSION>`.
1. On your local machine, make sure you are signed in to the GitLab Docker registry. You can find the instructions for this in
1. For more information about working with and running Omnibus GitLab containers in Docker, refer to [GitLab Docker images](../../install/docker.md) documentation.
This is the less recommended approach, because it comes with a number of difficulties when emulating a real GitLab deployment.
The [GDK](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit) is not set up to run a Prometheus server or `node_exporter` alongside other GitLab components. If you would
like to do so, [Monitoring the GDK with Prometheus](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/-/blob/main/doc/howto/prometheus/index.md#monitoring-the-gdk-with-prometheus) is a good start.
The [GCK](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-compose-kit) has limited support for testing Prometheus based Service Ping.
By default, it comes with a fully configured Prometheus service that is set up to scrape a number of components.
However, it has the following limitations:
- It does not run a `gitlab-exporter` instance, so several `process_*` metrics from services such as Gitaly may be missing.
- While it runs a `node_exporter`, `docker-compose` services emulate hosts, meaning that it normally reports itself as not associated
with any of the other running services. That is not how node metrics are reported in a production setup, where `node_exporter`
always runs as a process alongside other GitLab components on any given node. For Service Ping, none of the node data would therefore
appear to be associated to any of the services running, because they all appear to be running on different hosts. To alleviate this problem, the `node_exporter` in GCK was arbitrarily "assigned" to the `web` service, meaning only for this service `node_*` metrics appears in Service Ping.
While it is possible to aggregate EE-only events together with events that occur in all GitLab editions, it's important to remember that doing so may produce high variance between data collected from EE and CE GitLab instances.
After all metrics are persisted, you can add an aggregated metric definition following [Aggregated metric instrumentation guide](metrics_instrumentation.md#aggregated-metrics).
To declare the aggregate of metrics collected with [Estimated Batch Counters](#estimated-batch-counters),
you must fulfill the following requirements:
- Metrics names listed in the `events:` attribute, have to use the same names you passed in the `metric_name` argument while persisting metrics in previous step.
- Every metric listed in the `events:` attribute, has to be persisted for **every** selected `time_frame:` value.