2020-06-23 00:09:42 +05:30
---
type: howto
stage: Manage
group: Import
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
2020-06-23 00:09:42 +05:30
---
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
# Migrating from Perforce Helix
[Perforce Helix ](https://www.perforce.com/ ) provides a set of tools which also
include a centralized, proprietary version control system similar to Git.
## Perforce vs Git
The following list illustrates the main differences between Perforce Helix and
Git:
1. In general the biggest difference is that Perforce branching is heavyweight
compared to Git's lightweight branching. When you create a branch in Perforce,
it creates an integration record in their proprietary database for every file
in the branch, regardless how many were actually changed. Whereas Git was
implemented with a different architecture so that a single SHA acts as a pointer
2021-01-03 14:25:43 +05:30
to the state of the whole repository after the changes, making it very easy to branch.
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
This is what made feature branching workflows so easy to adopt with Git.
1. Also, context switching between branches is much easier in Git. If your manager
said 'You need to stop work on that new feature and fix this security
vulnerability' you can do so very easily in Git.
1. Having a complete copy of the project and its history on your local machine
2020-03-13 15:44:24 +05:30
means every transaction is very fast and Git provides that. You can branch/merge
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
and experiment in isolation, then clean up your mess before sharing your new
cool stuff with everyone.
1. Git also made code review simple because you could share your changes without
merging them to master, whereas Perforce had to implement a Shelving feature on
the server so others could review changes before merging.
## Why migrate
2021-02-22 17:27:13 +05:30
Perforce Helix can be difficult to manage both from a user and an administrator
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
perspective. Migrating to Git/GitLab there is:
- **No licensing costs**, Git is GPL while Perforce Helix is proprietary.
- **Shorter learning curve**, Git has a big community and a vast number of
tutorials to get you started.
- **Integration with modern tools**, migrating to Git and GitLab you can have
an open source end-to-end software development platform with built-in version
control, issue tracking, code review, CI/CD, and more.
## How to migrate
Git includes a built-in mechanism (`git p4`) to pull code from Perforce and to
submit back from Git to Perforce.
Here's a few links to get you started:
2019-12-21 20:55:43 +05:30
- [`git-p4` manual page ](https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-p4.html )
- [`git-p4` example usage ](https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Git-p4_Usage )
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
- [Git book migration guide ](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-and-Other-Systems-Migrating-to-Git#_perforce_import )
2018-03-27 19:54:05 +05:30
Note that `git p4` and `git filter-branch` are not very good at
creating small and efficient Git pack files. So it might be a good
idea to spend time and CPU to properly repack your repository before
sending it for the first time to your GitLab server. See
[this StackOverflow question ](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28720151/git-gc-aggressive-vs-git-repack/ ).