debian-mirror-gitlab/doc/development/what_requires_downtime.md

352 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
# What requires downtime?
When working with a database certain operations can be performed without taking
GitLab offline, others do require a downtime period. This guide describes
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
various operations, their impact, and how to perform them without requiring
downtime.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
## Adding Columns
On PostgreSQL you can safely add a new column to an existing table as long as it
does **not** have a default value. For example, this query would not require
downtime:
```sql
ALTER TABLE projects ADD COLUMN random_value int;
```
Add a column _with_ a default however does require downtime. For example,
consider this query:
```sql
ALTER TABLE projects ADD COLUMN random_value int DEFAULT 42;
```
This requires updating every single row in the `projects` table so that
`random_value` is set to `42` by default. This requires updating all rows and
indexes in a table. This in turn acquires enough locks on the table for it to
effectively block any other queries.
As of MySQL 5.6 adding a column to a table is still quite an expensive
operation, even when using `ALGORITHM=INPLACE` and `LOCK=NONE`. This means
downtime _may_ be required when modifying large tables as otherwise the
operation could potentially take hours to complete.
Adding a column with a default value _can_ be done without requiring downtime
when using the migration helper method
`Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers#add_column_with_default`. This method works
similar to `add_column` except it updates existing rows in batches without
blocking access to the table being modified. See ["Adding Columns With Default
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
Values"](migration_style_guide.md#adding-columns-with-default-values) for more
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
information on how to use this method.
## Dropping Columns
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Removing columns is tricky because running GitLab processes may still be using
the columns. To work around this you will need two separate merge requests and
releases: one to ignore and then remove the column, and one to remove the ignore
rule.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
### Step 1: Ignoring The Column
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
The first step is to ignore the column in the application code. This is
necessary because Rails caches the columns and re-uses this cache in various
places. This can be done by including the `IgnorableColumn` module into the
model, followed by defining the columns to ignore. For example, to ignore
`updated_at` in the User model you'd use the following:
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
```ruby
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
include IgnorableColumn
ignore_column :updated_at
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
end
```
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Once added you should create a _post-deployment_ migration that removes the
column. Both these changes should be submitted in the same merge request.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
### Step 2: Removing The Ignore Rule
Once the changes from step 1 have been released & deployed you can set up a
separate merge request that removes the ignore rule. This merge request can
simply remove the `ignore_column` line, and the `include IgnorableColumn` line
if no other `ignore_column` calls remain.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2016-11-24 13:41:30 +05:30
## Renaming Columns
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Renaming columns the normal way requires downtime as an application may continue
using the old column name during/after a database migration. To rename a column
without requiring downtime we need two migrations: a regular migration, and a
post-deployment migration. Both these migration can go in the same release.
2016-11-24 13:41:30 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
### Step 1: Add The Regular Migration
First we need to create the regular migration. This migration should use
`Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers#rename_column_concurrently` to perform the
renaming. For example
```ruby
# A regular migration in db/migrate
class RenameUsersUpdatedAtToUpdatedAtTimestamp < ActiveRecord::Migration
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
rename_column_concurrently :users, :updated_at, :updated_at_timestamp
end
def down
cleanup_concurrent_column_rename :users, :updated_at_timestamp, :updated_at
end
end
```
This will take care of renaming the column, ensuring data stays in sync, copying
over indexes and foreign keys, etc.
**NOTE:** if a column contains 1 or more indexes that do not contain the name of
the original column, the above procedure will fail. In this case you will first
need to rename these indexes.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
### Step 2: Add A Post-Deployment Migration
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
The renaming procedure requires some cleaning up in a post-deployment migration.
We can perform this cleanup using
`Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers#cleanup_concurrent_column_rename`:
```ruby
# A post-deployment migration in db/post_migrate
class CleanupUsersUpdatedAtRename < ActiveRecord::Migration
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
cleanup_concurrent_column_rename :users, :updated_at, :updated_at_timestamp
end
def down
rename_column_concurrently :users, :updated_at_timestamp, :updated_at
end
end
```
## Changing Column Constraints
Adding or removing a NOT NULL clause (or another constraint) can typically be
done without requiring downtime. However, this does require that any application
changes are deployed _first_. Thus, changing the constraints of a column should
happen in a post-deployment migration.
2017-09-10 17:25:29 +05:30
NOTE: Avoid using `change_column` as it produces inefficient query because it re-defines
the whole column type. For example, to add a NOT NULL constraint, prefer `change_column_null `
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
## Changing Column Types
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Changing the type of a column can be done using
`Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers#change_column_type_concurrently`. This
method works similarly to `rename_column_concurrently`. For example, let's say
we want to change the type of `users.username` from `string` to `text`.
### Step 1: Create A Regular Migration
A regular migration is used to create a new column with a temporary name along
with setting up some triggers to keep data in sync. Such a migration would look
as follows:
```ruby
# A regular migration in db/migrate
class ChangeUsersUsernameStringToText < ActiveRecord::Migration
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
change_column_type_concurrently :users, :username, :text
end
def down
cleanup_concurrent_column_type_change :users, :username
end
end
```
### Step 2: Create A Post Deployment Migration
Next we need to clean up our changes using a post-deployment migration:
```ruby
# A post-deployment migration in db/post_migrate
class ChangeUsersUsernameStringToTextCleanup < ActiveRecord::Migration
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
cleanup_concurrent_column_type_change :users
end
def down
change_column_type_concurrently :users, :username, :string
end
end
```
And that's it, we're done!
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2018-03-17 18:26:18 +05:30
## Changing Column Types For Large Tables
While `change_column_type_concurrently` can be used for changing the type of a
column without downtime it doesn't work very well for large tables. Because all
of the work happens in sequence the migration can take a very long time to
complete, preventing a deployment from proceeding.
`change_column_type_concurrently` can also produce a lot of pressure on the
database due to it rapidly updating many rows in sequence.
To reduce database pressure you should instead use
`change_column_type_using_background_migration` when migrating a column in a
large table (e.g. `issues`). This method works similar to
`change_column_type_concurrently` but uses background migration to spread the
work / load over a longer time period, without slowing down deployments.
Usage of this method is fairly simple:
```ruby
class ExampleMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
class Issue < ActiveRecord::Base
self.table_name = 'issues'
include EachBatch
def self.to_migrate
where('closed_at IS NOT NULL')
end
end
def up
change_column_type_using_background_migration(
Issue.to_migrate,
:closed_at,
:datetime_with_timezone
)
end
def down
change_column_type_using_background_migration(
Issue.to_migrate,
:closed_at,
:datetime
)
end
end
```
This would change the type of `issues.closed_at` to `timestamp with time zone`.
Keep in mind that the relation passed to
`change_column_type_using_background_migration` _must_ include `EachBatch`,
otherwise it will raise a `TypeError`.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
## Adding Indexes
Adding indexes is an expensive process that blocks INSERT and UPDATE queries for
the duration. When using PostgreSQL one can work arounds this by using the
`CONCURRENTLY` option:
```sql
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_name ON projects (column_name);
```
Migrations can take advantage of this by using the method
`add_concurrent_index`. For example:
```ruby
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
def up
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
add_concurrent_index :projects, :column_name
end
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
def down
remove_index(:projects, :column_name) if index_exists?(:projects, :column_name)
end
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
end
```
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Note that `add_concurrent_index` can not be reversed automatically, thus you
need to manually define `up` and `down`.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
When running this on PostgreSQL the `CONCURRENTLY` option mentioned above is
used. On MySQL this method produces a regular `CREATE INDEX` query.
MySQL doesn't really have a workaround for this. Supposedly it _can_ create
indexes without the need for downtime but only for variable width columns. The
details on this are a bit sketchy. Since it's better to be safe than sorry one
should assume that adding indexes requires downtime on MySQL.
## Dropping Indexes
Dropping an index does not require downtime on both PostgreSQL and MySQL.
## Adding Tables
This operation is safe as there's no code using the table just yet.
## Dropping Tables
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Dropping tables can be done safely using a post-deployment migration, but only
if the application no longer uses the table.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
## Adding Foreign Keys
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Adding foreign keys usually works in 3 steps:
1. Start a transaction
1. Run `ALTER TABLE` to add the constraint(s)
1. Check all existing data
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Because `ALTER TABLE` typically acquires an exclusive lock until the end of a
transaction this means this approach would require downtime.
GitLab allows you to work around this by using
`Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers#add_concurrent_foreign_key`. This method
ensures that when PostgreSQL is used no downtime is needed.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
## Removing Foreign Keys
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
This operation does not require downtime.
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
## Data Migrations
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Data migrations can be tricky. The usual approach to migrate data is to take a 3
step approach:
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
1. Migrate the initial batch of data
1. Deploy the application code
1. Migrate any remaining data
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
Usually this works, but not always. For example, if a field's format is to be
changed from JSON to something else we have a bit of a problem. If we were to
change existing data before deploying application code we'll most likely run
into errors. On the other hand, if we were to migrate after deploying the
application code we could run into the same problems.
If you merely need to correct some invalid data, then a post-deployment
migration is usually enough. If you need to change the format of data (e.g. from
JSON to something else) it's typically best to add a new column for the new data
format, and have the application use that. In such a case the procedure would
be:
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
1. Add a new column in the new format
1. Copy over existing data to this new column
1. Deploy the application code
1. In a post-deployment migration, copy over any remaining data
2016-09-13 17:45:13 +05:30
2017-08-17 22:00:37 +05:30
In general there is no one-size-fits-all solution, therefore it's best to
discuss these kind of migrations in a merge request to make sure they are
implemented in the best way possible.