3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Dalton Russell
|
dd304c1c1a |
Add deployment labels to deployment (#649)
### Description of the change Applies `deployment.labels` to the deployment itself. ### Benefits Allows the user to add labels to the deployment. ### Possible drawbacks None ### Checklist - [X] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm) - [X] Templating unittests are added Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/649 Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.com> Co-authored-by: Dalton Russell <dalton.russell@tangramflex.com> Co-committed-by: Dalton Russell <dalton.russell@tangramflex.com> |
|
yinheli
|
2ded843924 |
fix: Deployment has no field serviceName #466 (#467)
<!-- Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated: - Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. - Describe any known limitations with your change. - Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code. Thank you for contributing! We will try to review, test and integrate the change as soon as we can. --> ### Description of the change <!-- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. --> remove deployment, `serviceName` ### Benefits <!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? --> ### Possible drawbacks <!-- Describe any known limitations with your change --> ### Applicable issues <!-- Enter any applicable Issues here (You can reference an issue using #). Please remove this section if there is no referenced issue. --> - fixes #466 ### Additional information <!-- If there's anything else that's important and relevant to your pull request, mention that information here. Please remove this section if it remains empty. --> ### ⚠ BREAKING <!-- If there's a breaking change, please shortly describe in which way users are affected and how they can mitigate it. If there are no breakings, please remove this section. --> ### Checklist <!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] --> - [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm) - [x] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md` - [x] Templating unittests are added Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/467 Co-authored-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com> Co-committed-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com> |
|
pat-s
|
8e27bb9bae |
[Breaking] Add HA-support; switch to `Deployment` (#437)
# Changes A big shoutout to @luhahn for all his work in #205 which served as the base for this PR. ## Documentation - [x] After thinking for some time about it, I still prefer the distinct option (as started in #350), i.e. having a standalone "HA" doc under `docs/ha-setup.md` to not have a very long README (which is already quite long). Most of the information below should go into it with more details and explanations behind all of the individual components. ## Chart deps ~~- Adds `meilisearch` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready issue indexer. Only works with >= Gitea 1.20~~ ~~- Adds `redis` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store.~~ - Adds `redis-cluster` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store (alternative to `redis`). Only works with >= Gitea 1.19.2. - Removes `memcached` instead of `redis-cluster` - Add `postgresql-ha` as default DB dep in favor of `postgres` ## Adds smart HA chart logic The goal is to set smart config values that result in a HA-ready Gitea deployment if `replicaCount` > 1. - If `replicaCount` > 1, - `gitea.config.session.PROVIDER` is automatically set to `redis-cluster` - `gitea.config.indexer.REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED` is automatically set to `false` unless the value is `elasticsearch` or `meilisearch` - `redis-cluster` is used for `[queue]` and `[cache]` and `[session]`mode or not Configuration of external instances of `meilisearch` and `minio` are documented in a new markdown doc. ## Deployment vs Statefulset Given all the discussions about this lately (#428), I think we could use both. In the end, we do not have the requirement for a sequential pod scale up/scale down as it would happen in statefulsets. On the other side, we do not have actual stateless pods as we are attaching a RWX to the deployment. Yet I think because we do not have a leader-election requirement, spawning the pods as a deployment makes "Rolling Updates" easier and also signals users that there is no "leader election" logic and each pod can just be "destroyed" at anytime without causing interruption. Hence I think we should be able to switch from a statefulset to a deployment, even in the single-replica case. This change also brought up a templating/linting issue: the definition of `.Values.gitea.config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` in `ssh-svc.yaml` just "luckily" worked so far due to naming-related lint processing. Due to the change from "statefulset" to "deployment", the processing queue changed and caused a failure complaining about `config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` not being defined yet. The only way I could see to fix this was to "properly" define the value in `values.yaml` instead of conditionally definining it in `helpers.tpl`. Maybe there's a better way? ## Chart PVC Creation I've adapted the automated PVC creation from another chart to be able to provide the `storageClassName` as I couldn't get dynamic provisioning for EFS going with the current implementation. In addition the naming and approach within the Gitea chart for PV creation is a bit unusual and aligning it might be beneficial. A semi-unrelated change which will result in a breaking change for existing users but this PR includes a lot of breaking changes already, so including another one might not make it much worse... - New `persistence.mount`: whether to mount an existing PVC (via `persistence.existingClaim` - New `persistence.create`: whether to create a new PVC ## Testing As this PR does a lot of things, we need proper testing. The helm chart can be installed from the Git branch via `helm-git` as follows: ``` helm repo add gitea-charts git+https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart@/?ref=deployment helm install gitea --version 0.0.0 ``` It is **highly recommended** to test the chart in a dedicated namespace. I've tested this myself with both `redis` and `redis-cluster` and it seemed to work fine. I just did some basic operations though and we should do more niche testing before merging. Examplary `values.yml` for testing (only needs a valid RWX storage class): <details> <summary>values.yaml</summary> ```yml image: tag: "dev" PullPolicy: "Always" rootless: true replicaCount: 2 persistence: enabled: true accessModes: - ReadWriteMany storageClass: FIXME redis-cluster: enabled: false global: redis: password: gitea gitea: config: indexer: ISSUE_INDEXER_ENABLED: true REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED: false ``` </details> ## Preferred setup The preferred HA setup with respect to performance and stability might currently be as follows: - Repos: RWX (e.g. EFS or Azurefiles NFS) - Issue indexer: Meilisearch (HA) - Session and cache: Redis Cluster (HA) - Attachments/Avatars: Minio (HA) This will result in a ~ 10-pod HA setup overall. All pods have very low resource requests. fix #98 Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io> Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/437 Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com> |
Renamed from templates/gitea/statefulset.yaml (Browse further)