ctpassmore/mcaptcha-website
1
0
Fork 0
forked from mCaptcha/website
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fix typo and add foot note

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Aravinth Manivannan 2021-09-01 13:46:31 +05:30
parent e5f7a2c1d0
commit 67f5b270f3
Signed by untrusted user: realaravinth
GPG key ID: AD9F0F08E855ED88
1 changed files with 15 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
content/blog/pow-performance/index.md
View file

@ -22,8 +22,10 @@ wouldn't offer proper protection against bots.
Malicious bots(the ones that wreak havoc), run native code which is
capable of running in a multi-threaded context. This creates an unfair
advantage for crackers using these bots over legitimate users, who
usually | browsers to access a website. I wanted to see how much of
an advantage a native program would have over our WASM library.
usually use browsers to access a website.
I wanted to see how much of an advantage a native program would have
over our WASM library.
## Benchmark tools
@ -110,8 +112,18 @@ I ran the tests on both Firefox and Chromium to compare results
At the highest difficulty factor, the native implementation was a almost second
faster than the WASM library. But the fact that both of them were able
to run to completion in under 5 seconds is impressive.
to run to completion in under 5 seconds is impressive!
So, in my opinion, native implementation is only slightly faster than
the WASM library and for all intents and purposes, this shouldn't matter
much.
---
P.S Work is underway to benchmark multiple platforms. A detailed report
will be published when that data is available.
For this post, I asked some of my friends to run the tests on their
computers. The results slightly varied but even the slowest case
generated proof for 4500000 difficulty(the highest in this test), in under
15 seconds!