forked from mystiq/hydrogen-web
Change the backfill code to only close gap when all events overlap
This commit is contained in:
parent
92dcc6c980
commit
08461baedc
2 changed files with 28 additions and 53 deletions
|
@ -26,47 +26,28 @@ export class GapWriter {
|
|||
this._fragmentIdComparer = fragmentIdComparer;
|
||||
this._relationWriter = relationWriter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async _pickNeighbourFragment(txn, duplcateEventIds) {
|
||||
const duplicateEventId = duplcateEventIds[0];
|
||||
const duplicateEvent = await txn.timelineEvents.getByEventId(this._roomId, duplicateEventId);
|
||||
return duplicateEvent.fragmentId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// events is in reverse-chronological order (last event comes at index 0) if backwards
|
||||
async _findOverlappingEvents(fragmentEntry, events, txn, log) {
|
||||
let expectedOverlappingEventId;
|
||||
if (fragmentEntry.hasLinkedFragment) {
|
||||
expectedOverlappingEventId = await this._findExpectedOverlappingEventId(fragmentEntry, txn);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let remainingEvents = events;
|
||||
let nonOverlappingEvents = [];
|
||||
const eventIds = events.map(e => e.event_id);
|
||||
const duplicateEventIds = await txn.timelineEvents.findOccurringEventIds(this._roomId, eventIds);
|
||||
const nonOverlappingEvents = events.filter(e => !duplicateEventIds.includes(e.event_id));
|
||||
let neighbourFragmentEntry;
|
||||
while (remainingEvents && remainingEvents.length) {
|
||||
const eventIds = remainingEvents.map(e => e.event_id);
|
||||
const duplicateEventId = await txn.timelineEvents.findFirstOccurringEventId(this._roomId, eventIds);
|
||||
if (duplicateEventId) {
|
||||
const duplicateEventIndex = remainingEvents.findIndex(e => e.event_id === duplicateEventId);
|
||||
// should never happen, just being defensive as this *can't* go wrong
|
||||
if (duplicateEventIndex === -1) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`findFirstOccurringEventId returned ${duplicateEventIndex} which wasn't ` +
|
||||
`in [${eventIds.join(",")}] in ${this._roomId}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
nonOverlappingEvents.push(...remainingEvents.slice(0, duplicateEventIndex));
|
||||
if (!expectedOverlappingEventId || duplicateEventId === expectedOverlappingEventId) {
|
||||
// TODO: check here that the neighbourEvent is at the correct edge of it's fragment
|
||||
// get neighbour fragment to link it up later on
|
||||
const neighbourEvent = await txn.timelineEvents.getByEventId(this._roomId, duplicateEventId);
|
||||
if (neighbourEvent.fragmentId === fragmentEntry.fragmentId) {
|
||||
log.log("hit #160, prevent fragment linking to itself", log.level.Warn);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const neighbourFragment = await txn.timelineFragments.get(this._roomId, neighbourEvent.fragmentId);
|
||||
neighbourFragmentEntry = fragmentEntry.createNeighbourEntry(neighbourFragment);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// trim overlapping events
|
||||
remainingEvents = null;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// we've hit https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/7164,
|
||||
// e.g. the event id we found is already in our store but it is not
|
||||
// the adjacent fragment id. Ignore the event, but keep processing the ones after.
|
||||
remainingEvents = remainingEvents.slice(duplicateEventIndex + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (eventIds.length && eventIds.length === duplicateEventIds.length) {
|
||||
// TODO: check here that the neighbourEvent is at the correct edge of it's fragment
|
||||
// get neighbour fragment to link it up later on
|
||||
const neighbourFragmentId = await this._pickNeighbourFragment(txn, duplicateEventIds);
|
||||
if (neighbourFragmentId === fragmentEntry.fragmentId) {
|
||||
log.log("hit #160, prevent fragment linking to itself", log.level.Warn);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nonOverlappingEvents.push(...remainingEvents);
|
||||
remainingEvents = null;
|
||||
const neighbourFragment = await txn.timelineFragments.get(this._roomId, neighbourFragmentId);
|
||||
neighbourFragmentEntry = fragmentEntry.createNeighbourEntry(neighbourFragment);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {nonOverlappingEvents, neighbourFragmentEntry};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -234,31 +234,25 @@ export class TimelineEventStore {
|
|||
// In that case we could avoid running over all eventIds, as the reported order by findExistingKeys
|
||||
// would match the order of eventIds. That's why findLast is also passed as backwards to keysExist.
|
||||
// also passing them in chronological order makes sense as that's how we'll receive them almost always.
|
||||
async findFirstOccurringEventId(roomId: string, eventIds: string[]): Promise<string | undefined> {
|
||||
async findOccurringEventIds(roomId: string, eventIds: string[]): Promise<string[]> {
|
||||
const byEventId = this._timelineStore.index("byEventId");
|
||||
const keys = eventIds.map(eventId => encodeEventIdKey(roomId, eventId));
|
||||
const results = new Array(keys.length);
|
||||
let firstFoundKey: string | undefined;
|
||||
|
||||
// find first result that is found and has no undefined results before it
|
||||
function firstFoundAndPrecedingResolved(): string | undefined {
|
||||
for(let i = 0; i < results.length; ++i) {
|
||||
if (results[i] === undefined) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else if(results[i] === true) {
|
||||
return keys[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
const occuringEventIds: string[] = [];
|
||||
|
||||
await byEventId.findExistingKeys(keys, false, (key, found) => {
|
||||
// T[].search(T, number), but we want T[].search(R, number), so cast
|
||||
const index = (keys as IDBValidKey[]).indexOf(key);
|
||||
results[index] = found;
|
||||
firstFoundKey = firstFoundAndPrecedingResolved();
|
||||
return !!firstFoundKey;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
});
|
||||
return firstFoundKey && decodeEventIdKey(firstFoundKey).eventId;
|
||||
for(let i = 0; i < results.length; ++i) {
|
||||
console.log(i, eventIds[i], results[i]);
|
||||
if (!results[i]) continue;
|
||||
occuringEventIds.push(eventIds[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
console.log(occuringEventIds);
|
||||
return occuringEventIds;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Inserts a new entry into the store. The combination of roomId and eventKey should not exist yet, or an error is thrown.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue